abennett

I don't have it with other aircraft, and I am sure I have seen it in other places with the Twin Otter. I will check.

Thanks, sort of altitude dependent I think. This was noticed in the Caribbean around TNCM at about 2000ft

You can clearly see it below the red line I have draw. Like I say this is not any weather as it follows the aircraft.

The Twin Otter creates a sort of circle of low visibility when over the sea that is not in the weather, you can tell created by the aircraft as it moves with it, clear in the distance but right where the aircraft is over you get this sort of haze that moves with the aircraft.

Just tell him where the vloc/gps switch is for goodness sake.

Anyone else notice the flap sounds completely out of sync with the the actual movement of the flaps? It’s sort of ridiculous how poor the sounds are on this? Also when you cut the throttle for landing, it sometimes roars at you like the loudest its been all the flight when it should be quiet... it’s so poor.

PM'd

Thanks. Yeah I have spent hours and hours and hours testing over the last few days. Why one may ask? Because I adore flight sim, I adore the way we can discover more about our planet, I adore the way it can give us structure in our ever messy lives, I adore the fact that we can meet and get to know others from all across the world who share a passion despite many other differences, I adore the constant improvement in technology, I adore the fact that I learn something everyday from simming whether it be a little tip about how to better fly an aircraft, or a little little tip about a new program I can run on the side. But most of all. I just want other people to experience and relish this passion I have, and the joy it has brought to me over the years. Anything that I can do to make it more enjoyable for someone else, I gladly do, as do so many others in the community. So I test, and test, and test to find bugs, not to be awkward or petty, but just simply to try and improve a product. If one person finds something that is wrong, it is so worth correcting even if others wouldn't notice, because for that one person, it might make a huge difference, and if you can make a difference in one persons life, you should do it. So, Aerosoft, please learn from this, there are so, so many out there for whom flight sim gives real joy and happiness, so stop releasing half-finished products that haven't been properly tested, and listen to your community when there is a problem, instead of the usual response of, not our fault, it is user error or read the manual. You guys have the capacity to give people so much pleasure, and that is a big responsibility, but with it great reward and satisfaction. You guys should have acknowledged this rather than blaming others, or better still, never let it be an issue in the first place. I have other stuff to do you, you know, like my job, not spend all my time since release time trying to fix your problems. But I do it gladly, because the satisfaction when it all works is like nothing else. Just try harder next time, rather than make the quick buck, because it matters to some people. Looking forward to further development of this aircraft and rejoicing in the pleasure it will give to many, so thank you for that, and I wish this project all success. I am sure you have countless offers, but I am always happy to test things, I guarantee you, I will find something to be fixed... Best, A.

It's probably a feature...

I'm sure they will be fine though as they had just left them at the default c172 value rather than editing them specifically for the aircraft like the vast vast majority of other 3rd party developers.

I do not know comfortable Aerosoft are with people tweaking their cfg's so I am reluctant to post it here, but you can check on the official forums https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/aerosoft-twin-otter-baby/395128. This post has all the info. I am glad a persevered rather listened to those telling me user error and read the manual. I know what I am doing, been doing it for years.

Well well well, turns out it is not Asobo's issue with the autopilot, but rather Aerosoft's inability to make proper cfg files. A few changes to a cfg and the AP works perfectly... I'll wait for the apologies but I doubt they will come.

Well well well, turns out it is not Asobo's issue with the autopilot, but rather Aerosoft's inability to make proper cfg files. A few changes to a cfg and the AP works perfectly... I'll wait for the apologies but I doubt they will come.

Well well well, turns out it is not Asobo's issue with the autopilot, but rather Aerosoft's inability to make proper cfg files. A few changes to a cfg and the AP works perfectly... I'll wait for the apologies but I doubt they will come.

The default Cessna 172.