Jump to content

SQ024

Members
  • Content Count

    65
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SQ024

  1. Daan, With the current release you can assign textures only to an airport or a region, so whatever aircraft you fly you get the same textures on an airport. In a future release we can assign textures to airlines but how that will work is unknown at this stage. Keep in mind that AES works only on the aircraft you're flying, a random assignment of textures I don't expect but you never know what Oliver will come up with .
  2. Oliver, I installed the FSX GG-textures from Alex for the catering trucks in the XXXX-file name convention. On most of the airports they are used and show up except in EHAM (Aerosoft/DFS) where the default aerosoft textures are used. Testing the textures in EDDN gives all catering textures in GG-colors. Any idea what's wrong? Rob
  3. Thanks for your quick response. I think your right, EDDL (default) same effect. Could something be done about that, weather is ok without snow? I checked with the default fair weather in FSX which has 15 degrees celsius, still these snow effects. I have Antartica installed, can that have something to do with it ? Rob
  4. Hi, I installed over the weekend FSX on my new PC. At the moment only FSX and Aerosoft scenery is installed with fresh downloads from my shop-account. On a number of GAP airports (GAP2-2012 and GAP3) I have dirt and smoke showing up when taxiing on taxiways and on the runway. This happens at EDDV, EDDP, EDDH,, EDDW and EDDT. The other airports EDDG, EDDK and EDLW are ok as well as EDDM (non-GAP). I hope someone can help me with this. Regards, Rob
  5. I'm must be doing something wrong but when I go to updates on the Aerosoft site and select Mega Airport Frankfurt I can only see Service pack 1 and a fix for static aircraft. Tried to register but get the message that the product is already registered. I have the installation file for version 2.0 (I think it was a free upgrade from MAF2005 as my order-history shows that I bought it in 2007). B.t.w. just noticed that Aerosoft Launcher also did not recognize MAF being installed. Any help would be appreciated. Rob
  6. Hi Jeepee, Start menu; all programs; Aerosoft/Luxembourg Airport 2004/Airport Config Tool, after you start the tool select Program/Configure Airport Rob
  7. Hallo Rolf, Thanks for your feedback, as I said the developer (Christoph) might have had a reason for this. Scotts minor problem is/was also my problem, after line-up clearance it takes an unrealistic amount of trust to get the plane moving as well as when vacating the runway in the areas where the taxi-link has width zero. I'm looking forward to hear some feedback from Christoph. Regards, Rob
  8. Hi, I noticed the following mistake on the B-terminal. The ground markings don't align with the gate markings. see pictures Rob
  9. The problem is in the AFCAD. All links between the runway and the main taxi-way have a width of zero which means your wheels are in the dirt. Changing them to 36,58 meters (width in rest of the AFCAD) will solve your problem. Make first a backup of your AFCAD, the developer might have had a reason for this and the change can create another problem but I haven't found one yet. Rob
  10. The door is out of reach of the gate. Most likely the default aircraft position in FS9 is not the right position for the A330 in AES. Use the AES-menu to move the aircraft to the right position. Otherwise check the door position of the A330 in the configurator.
  11. Could be a wrong AFCAD active compared to the wind direction (use the AFCAD-tool to align) or a user plane on runway 09/27
  12. Good catch, lowering the setting on my ATI-card doubled the FPS
  13. You can try this post from the FAQ section. http://www.forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?showtopic=16315
  14. that's not what I meant. Open your Afcad in Afcad2. Double click the parking spot you want to assign to a parking area in stead of a gate to open the parking definition. Change gate into parking (or N Parking, NE Parking, etc). See attached file where Gate 614 is changed in Parking 614. Taxi to parking (or North parking, NorthEast parking, etc) is now offered as option, draw back is that ATC clears you to taxi to parking without mentioning the position. Rob
  15. No, you have to assign the parking spot to another identification area in the parking definition in AFCAD2, use in stead of Gate; Parking or in case you want several parking areas N Parking or SE Parking.
  16. Hi, I agree that the internal development team of Aerosoft could have been more responsive, it looks like they only respond in the german forum. Also my FPS are lower after applying this "performance improvement" update. What you can try is the following: In the folder Antalya 2010\Antalya_sc\scenery there are four files named LTAI_object_place*. Change the extension of LTAI_object_place_dense.bgl into LTAI_object_place_dense.off, start FS and check your FPS. If not happy continu with switching off LTAI_object_place_medium.bgl. I gained a few FPS but still FPS are less then airports like LEBL, EDDM or EDDS Rob
  17. . AI traffic is not generated by the scenery but by UT2. EHRD is only served by a limited number of airlines, from the top of my head CityJet (only weekdays) and Transavia (mainly summer season). If in UT2 there are no flight scheduled for these two airlines to EHRD then no traffic shows up. Have you check UT2 if there are flights scheduled for this airport?
  18. Please check the last page of the Barcelona FS9 release issues, problem is likely caused by Mallorca and/or Ibiza scenery.
  19. In which directory did you install FS9 because it sounds like you have a Windows7 UAC problem? Read these topics: link1 and the 4th post in this Link2 Vista UAC works the same as Windows 7 UAC Rob
  20. Searching for "Scenery Protection active" in this forum will give you several post that can give you directions. Rob
  21. You could try this link http://www.forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?showtopic=16315 Rob
  22. In the Amsterdam Schiphol folder after installation.There are no update files available only a new installer so you first have to install before you know what is changed. Maybe because the update is not announced yet it's not officially released but that's what this scenery is suffering from the beginning: Communication. It was Robinn who noticed a new version number on the installer. More then 53.000 views and 550 posts (+ the posts in the removed FS9 thread) for this scenery must indicate something. B.t.w. I agree with the observation of Arnaud (#550) that the EHAM FS9 thread is gone and it looks like the support from Gerard (which is appreciated) is only focusing on FSX. When EHAM FSX was released I'm pretty sure that in the FS9 thread was mentioned that the issues of FS9 and FSX would be combined and adressed. Having said this I admit that the effort of Gerard on taxi-signs is released also for FS9 in the 1.14 installer. Cheers, Rob I might have to recall my statements on the FS9 thread, first post in this thread is made on February 17th. This was the date that the FS9 version was released. This thread is initiated by Er!c and not Shaun so I'm not sure any more that there was another FS9 thread.
  23. SQ024

    Antalya ILS

    Hello Shaun, As mentioned in my posts I could only check in FS9 if I could recon the problem of Tomaz. The only problem I could see was the AI-traffic behaviour trying to land on 35R. If ATC vectored you properly to 36R in FSX the question of Tomaz in the original post is answered. Rob
  24. SQ024

    Antalya ILS

    Hi, Again I only checked the FS9-version but can imagine that the AFCADs for both versions FS9/FSX have the same errors in the approach definitions. For runway 36R the Final Approach Fix (FAF) is positioned at the wrong end of the runway, that's why the AI-aircraft have a wrong approach heading (see picture in my previous post). Runway 36C has an error in the missed approach definition. This has no effect on the AI-traffic because they can land most of the time. What I assume is that because of the error in the approach for runway 32R ATC is not able to give vectors to final and you get "forgotten" above the sea. With the corrections I made I get vectors to Initial Approach Fix (IAF) and can use the ILS to land. For some reason ATC still clears me for a visual approach although the approach is defined as ILS. I still have to work out what the problem is. Rob
×
×
  • Create New...