Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Emi

  1. Hi, if I'm not totally mistaken that something which is still being worked on for future updates.
  2. Hi, which speed do you fly such an intercept with? Mostly such turns are the result of very high speeds. Anything below 200kt IAS should work fine.
  3. Hi Uwe, für Support für die P3Dv5 Version poste bitte im Airbus Professional Forum, hier bist Du im FSX/P3Dv3 Forum gelandet.
  4. Hi, there certainly is a chance, but currently there's not enough data and/or time available for those. Right now developers are busy working on several plattforms (P3Dv4, v4, MSFS) already so capacity to include major new features such as new engine models are limited. That doesn't mean it won't happen in the future, but currently no promises can be given.
  5. Bonjour, as you're posing in the English forums please write in English language as well. Alternatively please post in the French subforum. Merci
  6. Hi Andrew, this is being checked by the developers. Currently it's something that was implemented in the A320 long ago, but then simply never was ported to the A330 as none of the testers used it. Might be included in an upcoming A330 update if we find the time for it.
  7. Thanks, if you ever encounter it again please send the full flightplan, best even save the flight and send us the full saved flight.
  8. That's not planned anytime soon. EFB's are the future, well or in real life they are the very present. My airline was probably the last to make the switch to a completly paperless flight deck in Europe (or the US) now with the end of the complete Corona stop.
  9. Are you able to reproduce this? Which weather engine did you use? If you're using ASP3D please tell us an exact time and location when you see this so that we can try to replicate it.
  10. Hi Fruman, which flight do you use as default flight? Could it maybe be that the aircraft in there has the fuel cut off? I'd recommend always to use the standart flight with the standart fighter. I'm pretty sure something is interfering with your simulators fuel controls here. Maybe an internal mixture axis set to cutoff or something the like.
  11. Hi, were there any discontinunities or anything strange with the linedrawing, etc.? Did the total mileage to the destination make sense (aka did you not accidentally insert a waypoint with the same name but in a different location)?
  12. It's impossible to provide some general settings as every joystick is different and in differnet conditions. You can use the slope function of FSUIPC to adjust the aileron to your liking. Maybe include a deadzone as well if your stick is too sensitive. You just have to experiment a bit to find settings that suit you and your setup.
  13. What's happening here is a feature used during flightplan editing. If you insert the same waypoint twice in a flightplan the Airbus joins them up and removes anything in between. If the same is supposed to happen during SID/STAR selection I don't know. I'm afraight right now there are not a lot of pilots flying who could give it a shot in the real deal to confirm or deny. All I can tell is that from the FCOM's description it is correct that if the same waypoint is inserted twice anything in between is removed. However that part of the FCOM is probably to be seen in a route editin
  14. I won't go into detail what happened with DetCord, that's not for the public eyes. Rest assured he can always contact Aerosoft using the support email address. He indeed is an excellent painter, but there were certain limits overstepped which resulted in his ban. Thanks for forwarding the message, it'll go right to the legal department.
  15. So switch it to a page which is not an unnecessary distraction. There is a useful page for *any* phase of flight, be it the enroute chart of your flightplan. I have my EFB running all the time as well in real life.
  16. Hi Louis, the clickspot of the instinctive disconnect button is indeed not modelled as we did not believe anyone would look down to the thrust levers to disconnect since normally you'd disconnect the AT only in rather busy situations. We therefore use the default command to simulate. the AT disconnec button
  17. Are you sure all the weights are entered correctly? Looks like something gets messed up during the calculation, which would point to weights or weather data.
  18. Just too be sure, what happens if you change to the outside view, wait a minute and then go back inside? P3D should reload all textures then. Do you still see this?
  19. Are you sure you turned the FCU's brightness up? Looks a lot like it would simply be dimmed down. There are two brightness knobs below the FCU, one for the integral lights, the other for the display brightness. Are both turned all the way up?
  20. I've had one single occasion where I changed the altimeter in the A330 (uses the same system as the 320s) was indeed set to STD, but still indicating local pressure altitude, despite actually showing STD on both the FCU and the PFD. There was no way to see that in the flightdeck, only the VATSIM controller noticed. In that case a reset of the altimeter to local and right back to STD sorted it out and then my altimeter was indicating correctly. Afterwards it never happened in over 500h of testflying this year. The developer checked it and I believe it got fixed (must have been
  21. Hi John, what do you mean with right hand radar screen? I assume the weather radar? Does it show correctly on the left side but only the top on the right ND? I believe the WXR is currently only implemented on the left ND for performance reasons.
  22. Alright, could you also answer the question I asked please?
  23. Certainly not in the next update. Maybe at some point in the future, but no promises.
  24. How do you install them? If you do it manually make sure to use a working texture.cfg file! Chanecs are you have one of an older Airbus which might not work with the v5 version.
  25. Regarding the GSX issue: You don't need to adjust any AFCAD: Just change the stand size in the GSX airport configuration menu. The reason why the AFCAD is the designed the way it is, is because you can not park several large aircraft next to each other, otherwise the wings could collide. However that's exactly what FSX/P3D would do if the AFCAD allowed for it. Using the GSX editor is the best solution here. Regarding Johanns question, I am not aware of any update plans at the moment. What exactly is wrong with the placing though? I am not aware of any such issue. Taxiwa
  • Create New...