Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by Emi

  1. 1 hour ago, lonewulf47 said:

    There are no extra costs for current subscribers


    But a lot of extra cost for the developers... why not wait and see what MS/Asobo will deliver?

    NavBlue provide very good data (my airline uses it as well), why not give it a chance?

    If it turns out that Asobos implementation might not be good NDP can still be adapted.

    Besides, what would you want LIDO or Jeppesen data for anyway, if the sim already has up to date data? You would see absolutely no changes...

  2. Hi Michael,


    you would need to do hundrets of flights to get the data you need. I'm not quite sure if you actually want to do that.
    Basically what you need is data for all possible weight, Speed, etc. combinations.

    Also you'd always have to test under exactly the same circumstances.

    Real aircraft manufacturers take months to draw these tables up (mostly done by computers) and only testfly a couple of them as crosscheck.


    What I'd rather recommend you to do, just to avoid thouasnds of working hours: Take an A320 CEO profile, run it through the aircraft BIAS tools and then use that data.

  3. 7 hours ago, FlorianWolf said:

    Gäb es da nicht die Möglichkeit einfach wie bei zürich die Afcad switchen zu können? Die mit AI Traffic könne die Heavy nehmen und alle anderen können dann quasi selbst entscheiden.


    In diesem Fall wäre es nicht so einfach mit einem AFCAD Switch getan, wenn ich mich nicht komplett irre müssten dann ja noch Jetways, VDGS und so weiter angepasst werden.

    In wie weit das möglich wäre, weiß ich nicht. Das kann vielleicht @OPabst beantworten.

  4. On 8/24/2020 at 10:25 PM, FlorianWolf said:

    Hallo zusammen, 

    ich wollte Fragen ob es Pläne gibt in der Zukunft die Szenerie zu updaten, sodass alle A+ Stands vorhanden sind. 

    Bis jetzt sind ja nur die Heavy stands verfügbar, jedoch wird gerade zur jetzigen Zeit der A+ Flügel von 320ern benutzt die dann auf die kleineren Positionen gehen. Wäre cool wenn das in einem Update nachgereicht werden würde :)





    Hi Florian,


    sorry für die späte Antwort.

    Leider ist das nicht möglich, da ansonsten die AI Engine immernoch A320 auf die AxxA/B Positionen stellen würde, auch wenn auch der eigentlichen Axx Position bereits ein Heavy steht. So schlau ist die AI Engine im P3D einfach nicht, weshalb man sich als Entwickler entscheiden muss. Entweder oder, beides geht leider nicht.
    Daher wurde sich hier für die Heavy Stands entschieden.

  5. Also keep in mind how most objects are created. Simple objects like houses can automatically be created from a sat image. But complex buildings like memorials, ship yards, etc. have to be created manually. While Asobo will surely do that in some of the major cities of the world they can not possibly create all landmarks all across the globe.

  6. 2 minutes ago, TorstenFS said:

    And now imagine there would be a fine flight simulator with less hardware requirements so that nearly everybody in the second and third world could use it.
    Can you imagine how many addons you could sell for this FS with a good marketing?


    I can imagine: None, because the hardware is not able to handle such addons.

  7. 11 minutes ago, Anton M-E said:

    With the Steam version now having been released, does anyone have any details on how that version will differ to the microsoft store version?

    I preordered the microsoft store version, but as I own most of my games on steam I would like to preorder it on there. Are there any downsides to the steam version?


    Thanks in advance



    Don't spread fake news, Steam has not released any MSFS version. They have the same presale as others.

    • Downvote 1

  8. On 7/24/2020 at 8:11 PM, Michael1955 said:

    250Kn ab FL100 werden nicht abgefragt, sondern 240Kn.!!!


    Die 737 (und meiner Kenntnis nach auch alle anderen Boeing Flugzeuge) haben standartmäßig 240/xxx drinstehen, da VNAV eine 10kt Overspeed Marge toleriert, bevor es anfängt zu korrigieren.

    In meiner Airline ist es SOP die 240/100 auf 250/100 zu korrigieren, da VNAV für gewöhnlich genau genug fliegt um die 250kt auch einzuhalten.
    ...und zur Not sitzt da ja immernoch der überbezahlte Knöpfchendrücker, um die Einhaltung zu garantieren. ;)

  9. Zur Zibo kann ich nichts sagen, aber generell: Wenn der Flieger verlangsamt, lass ihn das tun.
    Wenn sie immer zum selben falschen Zeitpunkt zu langsam wird, dann gib ihr doch eine größere Höhe auf der VNAV DES Seite ein.
    Mach aus den 250/100 doch zB 250/110.

  10. 26 minutes ago, mlinecker said:

    No need to get lordly against a customer here.

    I can use P3D without an problem if there are problems with internet connection. Looks like people are spoiled because connection problems are rare these days, but there are some on occasions.

    Whats with that offline-mode ASOBO always advertised for users with low bandwidth? All just false promises or attempted deception?


    Low bandwidth is something totally different than not being connected to the internet at all.

    • Upvote 2

  11. Hi Yuval,


    as you correctly figured it might indeed very well be the weather engine.
    Those speed jumps on the PFD you mention are most certainly wind changes (there is nothing else that could cause this), so the weather engine is involved. P3Dv5 has some wind issues which have to be overcome by the weather engine. Active Sky does that, but if your weather engine is not P3Dv5 compatible then chances are it doens't.


    Now why does that maybe only effect the Airbus? There could be several factors involved.
    1) Many aircraft developers don't simulate high altitude effects on flight dynamics. A certain 757/767 for instance are simulated with the same stall speed at high altitude as they have at low altitude. That's a difference of over a hundret knots in stall speed! Of course they deny such effects would even exist.... lovely 135$ products,  well worth the money! ;)

    2) Aircraft like the 747 have a large range of speeds at typical cruising levels. The difference between upper and lower speed limits in a 747 is greater than in an A320 when flying at similar levels. Thus the effect of wind shifts are less pronounced.

    3) Many developers ignore the effect of temprature on engine thrust ratings. If your weather engine inserts +40°C at FL370 the whole engine calculation of a *well simulated* addon will get messed up.
    If the developer doens't care about such effects and still gives you full thrust then of course the effect of the weather on that particular addon will not be visible. A bug hiding a bug so to say.


    Of course other factors might come into play as well.

    WIthout actually seeing what you see it'd hard to impossible to diagnose your problem though.
    Please post some screenshots and we'll be able to give you better help.


  • Create New...