Jump to content

Emi

Members
  • Posts

    10161
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    110

Posts posted by Emi

  1. 1 hour ago, robbyx said:

    Taking ages in my view compared to the other airports (Cologne to be released 1 month after preview for ex). Announced mid August showing a well advanced product from the screenshots and still not there almost 3 months later. 

     

    There's a big difference between converting (and of course enhancing) an existing airport and developing something totally new from scratch.

  2. 2 minutes ago, Christian Bahr said:

    Danke Emi 🙂

     

    Wobei man sich gerade die Frage stellt, wann der zeitpunkt erreicht ist, an dem man eine Szenerie veröffentlichen kann. Bis jetzt ging es nach wenigen Rückschritten gut voran und bis auf die Runway Lichter und die übrigen Flughafen Lichter ist soweit alles fertig für eine Veröffentlichung. Fehlt noch der Beta-Test, der die übersehenen Fehler ausfindig macht. Zuletzt ist es noch gelungen eine funktionierende Analog Uhr zu erstellen:

     

    Das ist in der Tat immer die gute Frage.

    Für Freeware würde ich sagen hast Du schon jetzt alle Standarts weit in die Höhe getrieben!

     

    Wenn Du noch perfektionieren willst, würde ich empfehlen an Apron und Taxiways noch etwas zu machen. Die Textur scheint mir sehr dunkel und die Variationen im Belag aus dem echten Leben scheinen nicht inkludiert zu sein. Ein paar Details mit Flicken, etc. wie sie im Luftbild von Google Earth zu sehen sind, wäre sicherlich auch noch klasse. Real ist der Flughafen ein einziger Flickenteppich. Da hat man sich kaum Mühe gegeben, ihn instand zu halten, weil da allgemeinhin davon ausgegangen wurde, dass er schon längst geschlossen sein würde.

     

    Das Gelb der Taxiway und Parkingmarkierungen müsste etwas heller sein. Du hast einen recht dunklen Orangeton getroffen.

     

    Beim Betatest kann ich dir gerne helfen, ich hab schließlich meinen ATPL in Essen gemacht!

    • Like 1
  3. Sehr beeindruckend Christian, die Szenerie wird von Mal zu Mal besser!

     

    Eine kleine Frage, Du hast natürlich Recht, dass das Stadtgebiet von Mülheim sehr gut abgebildet ist, wäre es aber möglich Landmarks und POI's, welche im MFS fehlen, mit deiner Szenerie zu ergänzen?
    Da fällt mir zB der Wasserturm ein, welcher einen wichtigen Teil der Platzrunde ausmacht und im MFS komplett fehlt.

    Die Modelle hast Du ja schon, sie müssten nurnoch platziert werden. Das wäre wirklich klasse!

    • Like 1
  4. 57 minutes ago, Overmind0673 said:

    i team @ Aerosoft.

     

    Since in Lockdown, i have been thinking a lot about it and wanted to suggest the idea if it takes traction of course.

    I have been purchasing your products and i must admit, they are formidable products, at least a champion for creating Airbus Planes.

    Most of North Americans are concentrating their efforts on creating Boeing aircrafts for flight simulation community. I and perhaps others thank you for allowing us to fly European birds.

    Your portfolio is good and we wish to have new joiners in the family. This lead me to ask this question and maybe others have already done that.

    What is the overall cost of New developpement for a new plane? man/hours.

    Given the fact that most simmers would like to have new planes. What is the amount of commitment you want to get from potential buyers to start a project?

    For example: conducting an online survey to know which products can attract sufficient interested persons, and invest a reasonable amount of money so you can start working on that project. Knowing that at the end of the cycle, the product will sell well among simmers from mouth to ears?

    Take this as a Groupon style influence buying.

    My Idea is: A340-300, since A350( maybe the available data does make it easy to model it as much as you would like)

     

    Thanks and stay safe.

    Regards

     

     

    Not going into details, but the cost of development of an Aircraft like an Airbus can easily add up to about a million Euros. Not only because of the manhours required, but also licensing cost, cost to geather all the information needed, the marketing and distribution, after sales support (which is huge with modern airliners compared to for instance a Cessna), etc.

    You can therefore calculate how expensive such an addon would have to be and how many you'd have to sell to start making money on it.

     

    For an A350 compared to an A340 you can easily double that cost.

    • Upvote 1
  5. 2 hours ago, Mathijs Kok said:

    And if AI traffic is indeed as Microsoft said and exact replica of what is happening at the same time at the real airport, don't you think that is many times better than what we now use? ATC has not been shown yet but I got the feeling it could be very good because I happen to know who are working on it. That is some very serious development. 

     

    If it's a replica or real traffic, does that mean you'll never ever find a spot in LHR during the peak hours? ;)

  6. The problem of course is, if you start ignoring certain values you're runnign the danger of ignoring valid numbers as well and thus make your aircraft less "flexible" according to certain external influences.

  7. 5 hours ago, Jammin16 said:

    Am I the only one who has a problem with this ???

     

    You're not but since there are many different ways these vehicles are implemented by addon developers I am afraid it will simply be impossible to make them stop for you.
    Even if we'd develop a full new system to control these vehicles other developers would have to implement this system.
    We are sorry, but this is very very unlikely to ever happen, not just from our side, but it's even more unlikely developers would update their older addon airports with it.

  8. 9 minutes ago, DriverX said:

    Dears, don't know where to post. But could you manage the following. If you are looking over your homepage and see a product what you have bought already, that you can see it directly so long you are logged in. Orbx homepage does have this. You know what i mean. I have so many stuff from you that i can't remember everything. So if i am looking around then i would like to see you own the product instead if the price or anything else. That would be cool. Thx 

     

    I believe there is a warning implemented by now which alerts you if you want to buy a product again that you own already. Not exactly what you're asking for but it goes into the direction.

  9. On 8/25/2018 at 2:20 PM, TrainNutter said:

    I would like to request that Aerosoft make a Bombardier CRJ100/200 & CRJ1000NextGen aircraft as an expansion package to the existing CRJ700/900X

     

    Below are some photos of mine of a Binter Canaries CRJ1000NextJen (EC-LOV) operating for Air Nostrum/Iberia Regional on flight IB8959 from Menorca-Mahon (MAH/LEMH) to Madrid-Barajas (MAD/LEMD).

     

    Rumors are that Hans Hartmann is working on the 1000. Release 2035!

  10. On 8/19/2018 at 4:24 PM, Jammin16 said:

    Hi, After I have now become the owner of Aerofts Hamburg-Finkenwerder, I would like to know if anyone knows if they are over the Boeing Air Field (KBFI) and Toulouse Blagnac Airport (LFBO) For P3D v4???

     

    I think it's would be very nice to have this airports/ Air Fields. B)

     

    Hi,

     

    Boeing Field is included in Seattle Airports X which you can find here (currently even at a reduced price!): https://www.aerosoft.com/de/flugsimulation/flight-simulator-x/szenerien/2397/seattle-airports-x?number=AS14380

     

    Seoul would be very nice indeed, but it is very hard to get access to that airport.

    Toulouse we can't promise yet, sorry.

  11. During beta testing we tested our Airbus with real world OFPs brought along by our fellow real life A320 pilots.
    The results were within a +-300kg fuel remaining using real weather and flights up to 6 hours. We couldn't get any real life OFP with flight lenghs of more than 6 hours, so anything beyond that can not be confirmed by flight tests.

     

    We can not really assure that fuel usage will remain realistic at fuel loads exceeding the maximum of 20t which we programmed. Theoretically it should remain realistic, but we never confirmed this with flighttests as it was simply too far away from what we expect the typical user to do with our bus.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use