-
Posts
132 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by DLH9KA
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Hello
@Aerosoft :
At this stage of development a feature set should be already fix and not in the process of beeing finalized!
Anyway my thoughts as a flightsimmer on the minimum required features:
- offset flying --> commong procedure used on a daily basis when crossing the NAT
- manually entering and defining waypoints --> not only to enter coordinates like LAT LON but also to create "helpers" along the route for diversions, or areas of special interest etc.
- ETP
- full SID/STAR/HOLDING/ARINC LEG type/NPA/ILS/RNAV support --> everything used again on a daily basis around the globe during normal OPS
- TERR display, WX Radar --> NOT THE DEFAULT BROKEN MSFS TERRAIN DISPLAY but a Airbus like system
- ACARS/ATSU/CPDLC Support --> weather changes during long haul at destination and needs to be downloaded of course prior landing, communication is often used via datalink nowadays and absolutely a stadard feature in an A330 today
- SEC FPL /ALTN planning --> diversions happen not only because of aircraft malfunctions but also because of weather etc. As MSFS has a very great weather system, it is crucial to be able to divert!
Pricing VS features:
Have a look at Fenix!
Fair price for a huge feature set!
If you cut out all "non-normals" and the failure simulation and the fuses etc... you'd come up with the above mentioned features at around 40 to maybe 45€ not a single cent more!!!!
Possible early access?
Many are having the feeling that a kind of early access is coming up!
Maybe because of the missing features at release like stuff you mention in regard to online flying or because it got common nowadays.
If you plan to do so...please tell us honestly!
If not tell us as well please!
Expectations:
As you may have noticed the expectations dramatically disconnect from the current project staus!
Maybe you should not have been writing about exciting news when not coming up with exciting news!
For the rest....
I hope you seriously have a good feature set at release without basic stuff missing!
And again... basic stuff for a long haul aircraft includes more features than for a medium haul A320!
- 1
- 2
- 21
-
Am 2.7.2023 um 18:54 schrieb mseder:
Regarding widescreens
The answer is VR.
Once VR you'll never go back to the 2D no matter how good the 2D graphics are.
I hope the A330 is well tested for VR.
Mats
Nah thats not true....
I have am HP G2 Headset and dont use VR all the time.
Simple reasons are comfort, multi monitor/window setup and eyes getting tired much faster than with a screen.
Immersion is unbeatable yes but using a 2D screen again is very well possible and I know quiet some people using both and in some cases VR and in other situations 2D.
Imaginating a long haul in VR is absolute not very pleasant IMO.
But thats just my opinion
-
Instant buy!!!
Do you need testers for the A330?
RW Air Traffic Controller and ICAO Instrument procedure designer acc. ICAO DOC 8168 VOL II
- 1
-
Oliver,
danke für die Antowrt!
Manchmal sieht man halt den Wald vor Bäumen nicht bzw...es fallen einem die fehlenden Bäume nicht auf
Autogen war eine Sache mit habe ich nicht im entferntesten gerechnet und auch nicht danach geschaut.
Hab im Forum immer nach München oder fehlenden Gebäuden usw gesucht.....
Dabei ja auch wie gesagt dass eben gefunden, aber danke für die Links.....leider hatte ich Autogen nicht auf der Pfanne.
War ja aber auch scon spät und nach etlichen Stunden des probierens.....naja ich denke jeder kennt das.
Da mein geliebter München ja nun auch wieder anfliegbar ist, ist dei Welt in meinem Flusi ja wieder in Ordnung.
An dieser Stelle mal vielen Dank für diese geniale Scenery und den flotten Support hier!
Happy Landings, Patrick
-
Problem gelöst.......GELÖST!!!
Unglaublich...
nachdem ich nun doch noch weiter gesucht habe im Internet habe ich was interessanten herausgefunden.....
Beim Flughafen Wien von Flytampa (V2) gibt den Fehler, dass bei ausgeschalteter Autogen Dinge am Flughafen fehlen!
Da ich nun in keinster Weise auf FS9 Bäume und die mehr oder weniger hübschen Klötzchenhäuser stehe habe ich diese immer schon ausgeschaltet gehabt!
Wie nun so darüber nachgedacht habe.....erschien es mir möglich, dass der gleiche Effekt ja auch bei EDDM auftreten könnte....man wies ja nie!
Und siehe da stellt man Autogen von Null auf irgendwas anderes geht alles wieder....An Abfliegen etc....
Das freut mich natürlich, dennoch frage ich mich warum das so ist und warum das nun offenslichtlich bei EDDM und LOWW so sein muss und warum die ganzen anderen Mega Airports etc alle auch ohne das hässliche Autogen funktionieren!
Frage an Aerosoft...Kann man sowas nicht beheben????? Wäre zumindest nett zu wissen dass man Autogen nie abschalten darf
Wie auch immer es ist zehn vor zwei und nach knapp 5 Std hab ich den Fehler gefunden..... Autogen...wer kommt denn auf sowas...als ob T1 und alle Hallen Autogen wären.... naja es geht!
Gute Nacht,
Patrick
-
Bin neulich mal wieder in EDDM angeflogen und dann das !
Der komplette westliche Teil des Flughafens ist leer.
Bis auf AES Gates und Autos etc ist da nichts.
Da ich nun ja schon so einiges erlebt habe mit AddOns habe ich folgendes probiert:
SceneryLibrary überprüft und nach fehlern oder auffälligen Sachen gesucht.....hab Leute gefunden die durch geschicktes Verschieben das wohl gelöst bekommen haben sollen zumindest im FSX.....
Als das nun vergebens war bin ich alle anderen MegaAirports angeflogen um zu sehen ob das Problem noch wo auftritt......Aber leider nix....Alle anderen Laufen einwandfrei!
Sei es EHAM EDDF LEMD LEPA usw..... alle funktionieren tadellos!
Dann habe ich mir überlegt, dass ich ja mal das alte EDDM installiert hatte und hab versucht Einträge in der alten GA1 Reihe zu finden die noch mit EDDM zu tun haben.... bei der alten GA1 sind ja z.B. EDDN mit bei usw....
Aber auch da....der Installer von MA Munich hat alles deaktiviert was damit zu tun hat....hat ja schliesslich auch bei allen anderen wie EDDS funktioniert und damit auch diese Fehlerquelle beseitigt.....
Dann habe ich versucht EDDM Tags über anzufliegen.....Ohne Erfolg, selbes Ergebnis!
Dann bin ich mit verschiedenen AddOn Fliegern angeflogen und den FS9 eigenen um zu sehen ob es daran liegen könnte....Ohne Erfolg
Dann habe ich Sachen wie Scenery Germany und FSG2008 Helipack usw mal komplett deaktiviert und rausgenommen......auch hier Ohne Erfolg
Dann habe ich MA Munich neu Installiert......nun auch das blieb Ohne Erfolg!
Nachdem ich jetzt nun seit etwa 4 Stunden oder mehr versuche herauszufinden was mit dem verdammten Flughafen nicht stimmt....gehen mir die Ideen aus!
Fest steht....
Starte ich in EDDM also lade ich dort, funktioniert er!
Fliege ich ihn an fehlt die hälfte! Egal wann und wie und mit was und Egal ob ich von einem AES Airport Starte oder nicht und egal ob ich REX habe oder ActiveSky oder Saitek Hardware oder Acer Monitor oder Basilikum im Blumentopf!!!! :mecry_s:
Und glaubt mir bis auf den Monitor und den Basilikum hab ich nun schon alles durch! :D
Zur Hardware für alle die glaube mein PC wäre zu schwach für den Airport ( PS Alle anderen egal mit welchem Flieger und egal wann und mit was, immer im VC egal welches Flugzeug von welchem Hersteller und welche Farbe mit 40+ FPS und das sogar mit wetter und online hastenichgesehn!)
Intel Core2Duo E6750 @2x3.1GHz
Nvidia GTX260 1 Gig Ram
4 Gig DDR 1600
Win XP PRO 32
Und irgend ein Mainboard von Asus mit vielen Zahlen und Nummern und SLI usw....
Wenn jemand noch eine Idee hat oder weis was man da tun kann ausser PC und Flusi neu Installieren bitte bitte her damit!!
Dieser Flughafen ist der geilste der Welt...zumindest für jemand der von dort kommt und ihn mehrmals im Monat anfliegt....
Vielen Dank im Voraus und LG,
Patrick
-
HI,
have a problem here.
The control Surfaces in VC don't move regardless of how I assign the Joystick pedals etc (FSUIPC or FS Menu)
I tried Cold and Dark and Ready to fly and allways loaded a std Flight with Std A/C in front.
The heli itself moves if i do an Input but the animations won't work here!
Furthermore after a few minutes and sometimes upon loading I get an CTD !
Error Message is Application: fsx.exe Mod: asc.dll
Began and occurs only with the Hhuey....
Unfortunately I have to leave to weekend now but maybe someone has an idea
Here my Specs:
FSX Sp2
FSUIPC latest Version registered
Saitek Yoke/Throttle/Rudder/ Cyborg X
Core2Duo E6750@2x3GHz
2Gig Ram
Win XP SP3
Geforce 260GTX 1Gig
Kind Rgds, Patrick
Edit:
All other stuff is working and Huey correctly activated
-
Any news on release?
Already Thursday :D
Rgds, Patrick
- 1
-
Just had a look at the manual.
Maybe I shouldnt have done that because now I wanna fly that bird:P
Any update regarding the bug you mentioned?
Kind Rgds, Patrick
-
What Manual?
Did I miss something?
Rgds, Patrick
- 1
-
It's wednesday and my sim is ready
What about the Huey?
Rgds, Patrick
-
OK, time to open the download channels
Just downloading the Helipack X and installing VFR Germany again....
Maybe the virtual SAR Helicopter can fly this night already!
Rgds, Patrick
-
Seems like your flight attendant is ready for the Oktoberfest in Munich!
Right thought the same
And IMO the Airport seems ready too
Kind Rgds, Patrick
- 1
-
" A little bit boring with a feeling like a busdriver - "next stop: Munich!"
There are people doing this all day using such strange noisy big machines in which they can leave the ground
Kind Rgds, Patrick
-
Agreed but question is, if it's already ready for release or are there still things undone....
Looking at the screens however it looks brilliant which makes me think its close to release!
Kind Rgds, Patrick
-
I can not wait for this to be released. Munich will be a must have. Credit Card is ready and waiting!
Totally agree with that!
Hopefully very very soon
-
Rainer,
very cool shots!
I love these bridges...last weekend I drove through one of them with an A340-600 crossing above.
Just an interesting feeling to know how many tons are currently some feet above you :D
However today is Octooberfest FlyInn on IVAO......maybe?
Kind Rgds, Patrick
- 1
-
Oh my god....all these screenshots are amazing!!!
I visit Munich twice a month when I fly home and seeing this is really great!
Any chance for this Weekend???? (Please?) :D
Kind Rgds, Patrick
-
Decided to add some pics to show what I mean:
First FADEC: pushed Throttle to TOGA and set Speed to 250KTS...now the Autothrust HAS TO give me the Computed N1 for TOGA but doesn't! It still holds the speed!
Second FBW:
straight and level Flight with low speed the autrim has to change the trim setting to maintain g-load(pitch) etc....
However it sets the elevator and shows on ECAM that they are in neutral position! Which is no accurate FBW!
Don't get me wrong I love this bird but these Items have to be corrected IMO
Kind Rgds, Patrick
-
Hi there,
After the update V1.11 I observed the following:
FADEC: The commanded Thurst (e.g. TOGA MCT or FLEX) will not be maintained by the autothrust system! It still tries to maintain the computed Spped by FMGS or the selected one!
This is absolutely not correct!
If I take Off with Flex 50 it command a certain N1 value and as soon as I'm airborne the Throttle decreases again....even if I switch to TOGA it doesnt increase to toga N1 value!
FBW....
Using AP Autotrim is working fine, AP constantely moves trim wheel to hold commanded G-Load
However as soon as I disengage the AP Trim will be set to zero and the control surfaces will keep the constant g-load or bank!
Guys this is absolutely not correct as well as the A320 autotrim also is working with AP disconnect!
As a result when approaching 100ft AGL during landing the surfaces move in neutral position and the Bus still begins to drop!
Please have look at this as these two items make that beautiful bird hard on flying from time to time!
Kind Rgds, Patrick
-
Wow I didn't even reach FL350!
Furthermore I was at level Flight from LOWW to EDDH this afternoon, FL260 with the A320 and a total wight of 50T!
The engines were running at 95%N1 struggling to keep 280kts!!!
Rgds, Patrick
-
Till today the loadmanager went quiet well
However I dont know why but it is now closing shortly after startup!!!
I decided to enable the log funtion here the log :
Sat Sep 04 17:37:19 2010
[04/09/2010 17:37:19]: AirbusXConnect.exe: BEGIN.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: TITLE>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <RDOS>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: Fuel1>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: Fuel2>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: Fuel3>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: Payload0>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: Payload1>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: Payload2>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: Payload3>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: Flight1>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: Flight2>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: Flight3>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: Flight4>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: Flight5>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <ATDD: Flight5>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <RDOS: Fuel>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Starting the SimConnect thread...
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Starting the webserver (main) thread...
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Webserver (main) thread started.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: SimConnect thread started.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <SubscribeToSystemEvent>: 0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Result of <CallDispatch> changed to: 0x0.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: FSX online.
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: Open: AppName="Microsoft Flight Simulator X" AppVersion=10.0.61472.0 SimConnectVersion=10.0.61259.0
[04/09/2010 17:37:20]: [Event]: Title received: Airbus A320 NIKI;
So it starts up shows me the display and when it says Connected to FSX it closes again!
P.S. yesterday it worked fine without problem and I have changed nothing....
Rgds, Patrick
-
Some talented Painter out there to paint an AirBerlin A320?
A321 is already in stock however I only fly A320
here a link towards the beauty i mean
Kind Rgds, Patrick
- 2
-
Just landedn the A320 from the outside and noticed the following :
The elevators were moved half the way up to keep a constant sinkrate!
The FBW does not trim the AC to maintain a certain bank or pitch it sets the elevators and ailerons!
And there lies the problem because when passing 100ft GND the elevators return to neutral position nad the AC beginns to swing.
Kind RGds, Patrick
Aerosoft Aircraft - A330 Preview
in Product Previews
Posted
I think the development of the Airbus A330 has gone into a very problematic situation!
First of all expectation vs possible reality:
Over the last years we have seen that very good quality AddOns dont need to cost very much at all.
Fenix is very fair with regards to features vs price as is the ATR.
JustFlights airliners are a bit more expensive but feature a lot of variants and theire respective features.
And freeware developers like Working Title and Fly By Wire etc....have showed us what can be done by the community.
Especially the last part is the most interesting one with regard to the A330 development.
Although there is no competition between a freeware WIP Mod for an even different A330 version, it is needless to say that the underlying features in regard to flight management systems, interface, usability etc. are very capable and in many areas above some payware standards!
If aerosoft aimed for a normal ops, pilot focused systems simulation then the whole freeware feature list has to be exceeded as of day one!
And in my opinion this is the problem here....
I guess we know that many features are considered uneccessary or more complex than intented by aerosoft and put aside.
But what if you can have thos features for free versus to pay for less?
Yes you guessed it...it becomes problematic!
Furthermore the fantastic headwind developers are in the process of creating even more A330 specific systems and an own cockpit for it to get rid of the default Asobo stuff.
Once that happens....it is a real desaster in terms of selling a software which features are at lower standards compared to maybe freeware.
Only exception may be the XBox market!
So in my personal opinion this situation plus the early development fails in regard to those missing and marked as unneccessary features is the root cause for what is happening now.
Let's wait, see and hope they will be able to put a good and nicely done A330 together!