Aerosoft official retail partner for Microsoft Flight Simulator !! 
Click here for more information

Jump to content

flycln

Members
  • Content Count

    39
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4 Neutral

About flycln

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Groundwork

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I think people are mostly surprised stuff is released with a bug that could be discovered by loading the airport at night... once.
  2. I’m 100% sure P3D will be used a lot by me for the foreseeable future. I don’t think I’ll be spending a whole lot of time with MSFS this year.
  3. It’s great to hear you’re supporting legacy technology. Wondering about the shipping costs, though. Just the standard amount I hope? And will you sell a black-and-white edition of the sim for people with less hard disk space? Probably needs much fewer floppy disks, too.
  4. I have better FPS and fewer stutters in P3D v5 and from what I see on all P3D-related forums that is basically the experience most people are reporting. That is the biggest plus I'm seeing. The smoothness is amazing compared to 4.5 and adds a lot of immersion. Contrary to what you're claiming, Enhanced Atmospherics is clearly marked as "Beta" in P3D5's options and has been all along since release. I'm not sure why you're saying it isn't, when it clearly is. It literally flat out says "Beta" in brackets behind the option in the settings. What left me dumbfounded the most is the way you've been slagging off Lockheed for weeks now. I can't imagine what this is doing to your "excellent connections". But that is obviously your call to make. I just find it unprofessional to do this in public. Not exactly a classy thing to do. And don't get me wrong, I very much appreciate both you personally and Aerosoft in general. Your support, pricing and update policy are reasonable, and I appreciate that I'm allowed to criticize you once in a while, like I'm doing now. It's just so weird to me to see you publicly slam Lockheed and now even post blatant falsehoods about EA not being marked as Beta. I just... don't get it? We all have bad days once in a while I guess but yours has been going on for weeks now. Hope the stress level will go down again soon. Must have been a lot of work recently.
  5. That’s only an issue with Enhanced Atmospherics which Lockheed clearly states is still in beta. So here you are trying to ridicule them with a “funny” bug that’s affecting a feature that is in beta and that nobody is forced to even use? Wow. EA will come out of beta in 5.1 and LM never claimed it’s fully ready yet. You always have the option to use traditional sky and clouds. Claiming this is a general bug with v5 is just disingenuous on your part. The way you’re trying to throw Lockheed under the bus in recent weeks shows that Aerosoft is going to try and shift focus to MSFS I suppose but trash-talking a platform you’ve made a lot of money off is rather bizarre. You’ve missed no opportunity to talk about how unhappy you are with Lockheed (the SDK, bugs... etc.). Do you really feel like you should be doing this in public as a business? Trying to burn your bridges with LM in public? P3D5 has been very solid for me and looks fantastic. Hotfix 2 has solved most of the pressing bugs. I can’t even imagine going back to 4.5.
  6. Have you set the Bus to use Navigraph data in the configuration tool?
  7. How convenient... Using P3D5 without any shader addons. The windshield looks exactly the same for me as it did it 4.5. I’m pretty sure it’s what Dave said. It was just designed that way. I just find the effect a little overdone.
  8. I don’t think this is a problem specific to the user. I’ve also found the cockpit windows way too dark all along. It’s like looking through sunglasses and totally unlike any other aircraft addon. It is what it is but I’d love for it to change. It can feel quite irritating when you see the terrain through sunglasses and then see it in all its glory when going to an outside view.
  9. No harm done I’d say. Looking forward to the release.
  10. That did indeed fix the weird rectangular area! Thanks! Great customer support.
  11. In fact I've just found a Youtube review of that scenery in which that part doesn't look this bad: at 31:22. I can only assume something is wrong with my scenery.
  12. Yeah, I've seen that on the satellite image myself. I'm just wondering if the scenery really depicts this part THAT terribly with those straight lines. No other part of the scenery is this bad.
  13. I just bought Malpensa Professional yesterday, and while I'm generally happy with it, I found there's a weird rectangular patch of grass just in front of the threshold of 17L. It looks extremely unrealistic with its straight lines and I'm wondering whether this is what it is supposed to look like. See the light green rectangle on the right side of the picture. I don't see any ORBX compatibility issues in the forums so I don't think it's that? (I do not have ORBX Vector).
  14. I'm not expecting you to. I understand the situation you're in. And I wasn't implying that either, my dear.
×
×
  • Create New...