Jo Erlend

Hello! v1.1.1 should already have the correct runway numbers, can you check which version of EDDK you have installed?

From what I can tell this issue was related to and issue in Navigraphs' navdata, https://forum.navigraph.com/t/overlapping-runway-textures-at-ebbr-brussels/23010 If you still have the issue after updating to -rev3 do let me know though.

What if you turn off navigraph navdata? does that make a difference? Since you got a duplicate runway something must be placing it there..

Hello! I'll take a look! I would also do as srcooke said and take a look what you have installed for that area since it looks like something is interfering with our Brussels scenery, for example you have double runway edge lights and incorrect runway textures. Here's an image of how the runway should look like, the dark area on your extends further out from the edge line for example. Is this with the scenery installed in the community folder? Or is it purchased through the In-game store?

Since that's a different 3D model than what's used in the Aerosoft Trondheim scenery it would need to be added from some other addon, I would doublecheck the GSX profile that it doesn't have any VDGS placements as that model looks very similar to one that's from GSX.

Hello, can you post a screenshot of the VDGS model itself? I did a test on my end without being able to recreate the issue. Here's what the 3D model should look like at Trondheim. If you're using GSX make sure that you don't use a profile for Trondheim that places their VDGS models as well.

Hello! The runway designators were updated in the last version of the scenery. (v1.1.1)

Happy to help! Oslo does come with it's own default service configuration and some custom ground service vehicle models, but you can disable it if you want to see the GSX vehicles being used to service AI traffic at the airport.

Hello! From the screenshots it looks like you have multiple different Frankfurt sceneries installed, sadly Asobo hasn't included a way for you to disable sceneries being streamed. So to make sure Aerosoft Frankfurt has the highest priority you'll need to add an xml file called "Content.xml" to your msfs LocalCache folder. for the MS store this is found here, %localappdata%\Packages\Microsoft.Limitless_8wekyb3d8bbwe\LocalCache\ for Steam the folder is found here, %appdata%\Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024\ I've attached an example xml where you can see that I've changed the priority between the Aerosoft and Default EDDF scenery included in the premium deluxe version of MSFS. (If you have any other Frankfurt sceneries installed add those packages to the list as well and give them a priority similar to the asobo package.) <Priorities> <Package name="asobo-airport-eddf-frankfurt" priority="-100" Active="True"/> <Package name="aerosoft-airport-eddf-frankfurt" priority="0" Active="True"/> </Priorities> Content.xml

Hi, there are indeed some issues going on in general with jetways in 2024. Since this is widespread and effects both default and custom jetways I suspect this is something Asobo would need to sort out in the sim code. But I'm keeping an eye on this if anything needs to be done from my side. https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/jetways-airborne-and-move-with-changing-zoom/675808

Hello! The left airport and services windows in the FSDT configurator is for the airports where you want to see the GSX jetways. Looks like this is mixed up on your end, so you would need to swap the left and right airports / services for it to work, it should look similar to this: In this example the GSX jetways for EBBR, EDDK, ENGM, ENVA, GCLP and LEMH would be excluded. And if you also want to exclude the services you would do the same in the bottom window.

Hello, this is due to the "EDDK_AIRAC2024+_compatibility_fix" having a higher priority than the Aerosoft EDDK scenery. You can either remove the "edggnav-airport-eddk-cologne-bonn" folder from your community folder, or you can adjust the loading order of it in the Content.xml file. I would assume the reason why you didn't see the same issue with iniBuilds EDDK is that it's installed in the Official not the Community folder hence getting a different priority in loading. The Content.xml file would look something like this, with the Aerosoft EDDK having a higher number than the AIRAC compatibility fix. --------------------- <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?> <Priorities> <Package name="navigraph-navdata-base" priority="1"/> <Package name="edggnav-airport-eddk-cologne-bonn" priority="2"/> <Package name="aerosoft-airport-eddk-cologne-bonn" priority="3"/> <Package name="navigraph-navdata" priority="4"/> </Priorities>

Great! yes, just let me know if you still have issues with an airport, you can use both the aerosoft VDGS and GSX at the same time, but you would need to check the GSX profiles you've downloaded. Some creators make two different profiles, one where the GSX VDGS is used and another where the AS VDGS is used. For Oslo there is a GSX profile included that supports the AS VDGS. You can also manually edit the GSX profiles either through the editor or with a text editor and set the "parkingsystem = Dummy" on the stands you want to disable the GSX VDGS at, if you feel comfortable doing so.

Hello, one thing that could cause this is if the folder name for the airport scenery has been changed? For example brussels should have the name "aerosoft-airport-ebbr-brussels". Can you also generate a log file, to do this you'll need to open the "aerosoft-vdgs-driver-log.ini" file in a text editor and set Verbose=1 Then load into the airport and open up the VDGS UI, attach the "aerosoft-vdgs-driver-log.log" file here and we can get a better idea of what's going on

Hi, we'll look into this for the first update