Jump to content

BerndB

Members
  • Content Count

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

-2 Poor

About BerndB

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Groundwork

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. just saw that this was already discussed in another topic, sorry. If this comes from LIDO it´s maybe a feature rather than an issue. Could it be that the real pilots want to have both, the former and actual charts in access, to see what was revised?!? In this case, it´s maybe a option to "flag" the revised charts in the NDP chartviewer somehow...
  2. I noticed that with the latest version of CDP Charts for Windows desktop i have doubled charts show. It´s not the case for all but for most of them for most of the airports. I have App-Version 0.1.40 in use. cheers
  3. i have experienced the same at that gate. It happens aswell when you arrive at that Gate with an A320. Once the VDSG give the "stop" signal the aircraft is not as near to the gate as it should and you get in trouble with the Jetway not docking or weird. Even GSX says "no Jetway which can used at this position", but it´s recognizes the Sode JW as present.In outside view you can also see, that the nosewheel isn´t far enough. It even is not at the first stopmarking on the ground. As far i could test yet it´s only an issue at this specific gate. If you use the slewfunction to position the ac corre
  4. Mathijs, i don´t understand how you could even have little doubt, if it´s opens...tz.tz.. But anyway, an actual "revison" would be very appreciated for BER for P3D. As i have seen there will be an updated version for MSFS.
  5. Oliver and Fabio, Top of library is not good if other add-ons are in use. Beat578 said it right. The insertion point of OrbX Airports should be below the lowest "non-Orbx airport". If there is an airport which is not injected by an add-on.xml but via the legacy scenery.cfg, the insertion point should be set below that add on. To Fabio i recommend to take a look at Lorby´s add-on organizer. Especially if you have competing add-on injectors like OrbX, you stay in control what is where ordered in your SIM.
  6. well, it came up for me surprisingly too, because all other V5 installers for blearic islands, Heathrow, Barcelona, Madrid, etc. did their job well. It´s just for head up that there could be something not 100 % right and because the installers stay available in you customer account, it´s worth to make sure everything is as it should be...
  7. exactly that! Indeed it´s a little bit of bad english. It shouls say "copy into..." instead of copy below...
  8. first of all i want to thank all of you for the ongoing support and the updating to V5. I really appreciate this and it´s not mandatory at all developers. I have installed EDDK with the V5 installer and it´s installed in the right place and i was able to configure EDDK to my wish, so everything seemed ok. But when i took EDDK as location it didn´t showed up in P3D. Only the default EDDK. The reason was, that the add-on xml wasn´t created by the V5 installer. After i´ve added EDDK via xml with lorby´s it shown in the SIM. I haven´t had this issue with all the other Aerosoft airports
  9. ahhh very very nice, Mathijs! The long awaited two finger zoom for touchdisplays and the nightmode is cool. Thank you Bernd
  10. Just for information, that only the airport charts not loading. The Route-Charts can be seen. If this may help...
  11. Shouldn´t be a too big challenge for you, if you can cope with this nice slice of meat in your avatar.
  12. oh that´s easy. Take this one for the captain side (which is left handed) https://www.vier-im-pott.com/index.php/de/component/hikashop/product/127-a320-sidestick-cpt-side and put this on the VPC Warbird Base from VIRPIL controls. https://virpil-controls.eu/vpc-warbrd-base.html This is very near at the real one which i had touched and moved already.
  13. just checked right now while i´am posting this. No charts!
  14. Aerosoft weiss bereits bescheid und arbeitet an dem Fix. Steht im englischen Forum zu NavDataPro.
  15. Hi Stephen, because I took your time to support me, I just want to inform you, that meanwhile I´ve decided to subscribed to Aerosoft´s NavDataPro + Charts annual update. And now, since I use always the actual airac cycle within PFPX, the routing AND the altitudes computed by PFPX are correct, or better to say make more sense to me again. So it seems, that the complex parameters PFPX v2 is taken into account while computing the routing works much better if the airac data is more actual. I have to say MEA CULPA, because i´ve blamed PFPX first instead of looking if there is may be an
×
×
  • Create New...