Jump to content

radeon29

Members
  • Content Count

    150
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by radeon29

  1. yes, I already fixed it for myself, although setting AcftType = 'NOT DEFINEDALL_ACFT' I think was intentionally done by the developer(this was done intentionally for some purpose), but it doesn't seem to work correctly... I already fixed it for myself, the problem was a text error, tag closing was not performed correctly: ; "/> was "/> should --- I have a more serious problem, neither I nor the scenary developer(AS non developer this) knows the solution, everything looks right, but we get a warning: WARN SODE.XML : Environmental Data Probe ‘LTAI’:
  2. ok, I’m waiting, will be good if the soda developer, can remove the warning, I also wrote him, thx!
  3. the developer of specifically this scenary is Maxim, he said that he is looking for a problem, I already found this: extra characters caused a problem... SODE warnings are probably not just(senselessly) created?
  4. Hi Oliver ! yes sorry, the first one by mistake, this refers to JustSim. the second problem is exactly your scenario, I already fixed it, I already wrote to the developer, I think he will soon find it the same. well let's call it a problem, but no matter how we call it, it should not be... I fixed it myself, I think the developer will see this message and make a fix for everyone.
  5. Yes, the new soda has been substantially changed, newest AS scenary for P5 now give an error: EDDV [13:03:56.846] DEBUG SODE.XML : Building List from File 'C:\ProgramData\12bPilot\SODE\xml\JustSim_EDDV_VDGS.xml' [13:03:56.848] WARN SODE.XML : [VDGS] SimObject 'VDGS GATE 16', Stop@22.600000: AcftType='NOT DEFINEDALL_ACFT' is not supported by SODE! --- LZKZ [13:03:56.903] DEBUG SODE.XML : Building List from File 'C:\ProgramData\12bPilot\SODE\xml\LZKZ_Kosice_rain.xml' [13:03:56.903] WARN SODE.XML : Environmental Data Probe 'LZKZ_Kosice_rain': Listed Client SimO
  6. Hi! I have not performed this procedure for a long time and just forgot it ... what actions must be performed in order to be MCDU offered optimal cruise altitude in case of activation of an alternative route?
  7. Yes, I know this, usually use the base airport elevation. in this case, because there is a high elevation difference between the runway 96 to 37ft, this is probably the right option, ok...
  8. Aerosoft 49ft Correct 95ft please check it.
  9. Yes,it is🙏 Or🤗 I suggest just adding a second AFCAD to switch it through the configurator before starting sim. For your part, only make a new AFCAD with an angle of 3.2, and I will set all other navigation as in truth. How do you like this idea?
  10. One of the problems has been fixed in the latest update, but nothing was said about papi angles? How to switch them from 3.2 to 3.0 (and vice versa)? unrealized?
  11. i confirm, in the latest update, DME was added but the problem of markers is not solved;)
  12. nevertheless you can use my adaptation for P5, but you will need the original installer and recording prepar3d v3 for install the scenary base: -fixed navigation aids and ILS -fixed vector data -default bridges excluded -added wind socks and glide transmitter -add Dynamic Lighting (credit to inibuilds) https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1pvhuBK9fZSZHq6ogQ7gTqrlTGtLAb9JV?usp=sharing
  13. use this free utility to find conflict easily: https://www.aero.sors.fr/hfiles/BGLFacilityScanner.zip
  14. yes this is so: unfortunately without an initial .ad4 project, it is very difficult to move all objects to new coordinates...
  15. +1 only on the contrary for me, the ND are enlarged, for a330 this was not... p/s:
  16. Yes, I read about it, the gs mini looks great( but in any case we use +5). i.e wind correction is needed only without A/T?
  17. as far as i know it should be something like this: VAPP = VLS plus 1/3 of the tower headwind component. The value of VAPP is limited so that it is never less than VLS + 5 or more than VLS +15. As a result, VAPP is increased above its minimum value for runway headwinds above 15 knots. VAPP correction is not increased further for headwinds exceeding 45 knots. But I miss an example for a complete understanding: if the wind is 16-17 knots we need to set plus 6? and is this true if we do not use A/T? if we use A/T then it’s only + 5 for all cases or?
  18. Sorry, I wanted to know if there is such a topic for a320?
  19. Since efb still does not have a function for calculating performance, you need to use a third-party calculator, which one do you use?
  20. in the original version Cologne Bonn Professional for P5 there is no DME for 14L, (it is right). --- while we wait for the official fixed, I already fixed : -added DME for rwy 32R and 24 + correct sim map course -deleted the wrong marker MM for rwy 24 -added a missing marker for rwy 14L EDDK_ADEP4_ADE.bgl
  21. As I noticed, there are no DME for rwy 32R and 24, check it please...
  22. what happens if we use this file?
×
×
  • Create New...