Jump to content

mikkel

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    222

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Posts posted by mikkel

    Clean-up of Aerosoft shop

    in English

    Posted

    On 1/23/2024 at 7:58 PM, Tom said:

    Perfect - I'll pass on the feedback regarding this and see what can be added.

     

    Still not able to filter out simulator when searching.

    I'm having a hard time to understand how it cannot be top priority to keep the shop competitive.

    Aerosoft - The home of abandonware

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    14 hours ago, amahran said:

    And do you actually want bug reports or not? Because I’ve been documenting everything meticulously, but if Aerosoft is signaling that my effort is a waste of time by simply not acknowledging anything I’m reporting, I can go back to lurking and let this forum go back to being as quiet and inactive as the Twin Otter support forum. This crap takes time and makes my simming evenings take twice as long as they normally would be, and if my effort is wasted here, I’d rather do this whole reporting and feedback with a different aircraft, and help a developer that makes me feel like my time is well-spent.

     

    Ball’s in your court.

     

    I hope you'll get a sincere reply to this. I see the effort you've done, and hope it's appreciated.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1

    Tailstrike Designs - Airport Bergamo

    in Airports

    Posted

    Beautifully made airport, hope this developer will come with more sceneries. However there is an issue in the Bergamo scenery that should be resolved as soon as possible.

     

    The hedges draw up like a visual sore through the otherwise excellent scenery.

    Screenshot 2024-03-31 231016.png

    Screenshot 2024-03-31 230953.png

    Screenshot 2024-03-31 230936.png

    • Like 1

    A330 NEO

    in Radio Chatter Room

    Posted

    Just read the newest update, and wonder what the heck you are up to regarding the project management of the A330. Developing more variants of the A330, before getting one of the models to market...?

    Minimum viable product anyone?

     

    All aircrafts made for MSFS show that issues needs to cleaned out and features need to be fixed or even added after initial release, to satisfy customers expectations and match the evolving competition.

     

    How did you come to the conclusion that you should develop a series of A330's in vacuum, one of them a completely different model (NEO), before releasing at least one of them to the public and get some cash-flow and customer reactions?

     

    Sorry, it's not my business, but I really get the feeling of a project lacking serious professional management.

     

     

     

    Soooo......any news?

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    On 3/15/2024 at 7:54 AM, Lars K. Rønes said:

    At this point, I think the best that would happen is that a respectable developer who actually cares about the product and the customers who buys it will develop a new CRJ which will leave this Aerosoft one in the dust.

     

    You wonder what's nonsensical? That bullshit you wrote right there. Some buying the CRJ, but for developing a new one, etc... ? Makes no sense. And adding to injury, do you have any insight into how well documented the code for the project is? No.

    And you know _this_ is not true:

     

    7 hours ago, Lars K. Rønes said:

    but it is quite clear that Aerosoft has no interest in the CRJ. Lets be real here, we're talking about finishing an UPDATE fixing bugs, not redeveloping a complete and new complex airplane...... It is inexcusable. 


    And since you know the written language to some extent, you are also able to read that a quite large update is in the works.

    Sorry, but people should stop writing like teenagers when they are done with their teens, preferably long before.

    But we can agree on that an update to fix open issues are long overdue...

    • Upvote 2

    Soooo......any news?

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Lars K. Rønes said:

    At this point, I think the best that would happen is that a respectable developer who actually cares about the product and the customers who buys it will develop a new CRJ which will leave this Aerosoft one in the dust. I will definitely not buy anything Aerosoft again, unless the current attitude towards supporting products change, as well as proper communication towards customers. Nobody wants to listen to "We're working on it, trust us, it will come when its done" for a year or more. 


    I really wish you could delete this rather insulting and mostly nonsensical post.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use