Jump to content

michael-t

members
  • Content Count

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About michael-t

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Groundwork

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. It seems that the cause of my problems with pressurization were old flights saved in 2017. I will continue to test fly and if the problem returns will report back. Michael
  2. Hans, take off was from EGHI Southampton. Since the runway is rather short, I did a packs off take off (this habit stems from a Boeing 737 tutorial). After reducing thrust from TOGA to CLB detent, I switched packs on (somewhere below 3000ft). Michael
  3. Yesterday, on a flight from EGHI to EDDL (FL320) the cabin altitude rose up to 14000ft and stayed there till after landing. I am seeing strange pressurization issues from time to time. Possibly these are related to switching off the packs before take off and switching them on again after take off. Michael
  4. Vvince, since I have the Oculus Rift, I only fly in VR. The CRJ runs very smooth with the Rift and P3Dv4.4 in native VR (single-pass mode). Surely, I have to use zoom to read the small dials. This is o.K., but zoom causes one problem: while setting HDG, Speed, ALT, VS and CRS on the glareshield using mouse, I cannot check what I do on the PFD. Therefore, I have to repeatedly look at the PFD, which in turn causes the mouse cursor to loose focus. But the feeling of sitting in the cockpit is overwhelming. Go give it a try. Michael
  5. Hans, I had version 1.2.0.0 installed on 23.7.18 and no update in between. Thank you for superfast service, Michael
  6. After updating to the current version 1.2.3.0 via Aerosoft updater, a window pops up: Groundroll.wav is missing. Thereafter, the airplane loads. Michael
  7. One small thing: the CRJ Flightplan Format.pdf can still not be opened. There is one for download in the forums though, but it would be perfect to include it in the installer. Thank you, Michael
  8. Excuse me, Hans. I had hangared the CRJ before the update and forgot some steps of the FMS-preparation: as soon as Perf-Init was complete, it showed up on the MFD. Michael
  9. Since the update, flightplans do not show on the MFD. Michael
  10. Moreover, if you go for a longer flight (800NM or so), the calculated fuel in kg is within limits. However, if you switch to lbs, it says "more fuel than the aircraft can carry". Developers, please check the math behind it, Michael
  11. During startup, there is a sound gap between the first phase (starter motor) and the second phase (turbine whine). I know the real Bronco startup sound from airshows, and it sounds quite different: first the starter motor, then the tick-tick-tick of the igniter and thereafter the turbine windup - all mixing into one another. I suppose the differences are due to FSX-limitations but could a developer please comment? (I have the version 1.12 installed.) Michael
  12. Ich habe mir als Düsseldorfer natürlich sofort diese schöne Route gekauft. Leider kann man aber den Sound der mitgelieferten BR143 kaum ertragen, da er permanent nach einigen Sekunden abbricht und dann neu einsetzt. Es hört sich an, als sei ein Loch in der Soundschleife. Kann man vielleicht ein Sound-Alias auf eine andere E143 programmieren, oder kommt ein Fehlerupdate? Michael
  13. I am asking this because there were rumors over at uktrainsim: will you release through Steam? Michael
  14. Tach zusammen, ich benutze seit langem Pro Flight Emulator (PFE) für den Funkverkehr und hatte damit bisher keine Probleme, solange die Regional Settings auf Englisch stehen. Nach der Installation der "German Airports 3 X für FSX" habe ich die PFE-Database aktualisiert. Leider bekomme ich von PFE aber beim Abflug aus Tegel vom Tower die Anweisung "contact Departure on 119.63". Unter dieser Frequenz ist aber kein Kontakt möglich. In der Datei "freq_conversion.dat" weist PFE den Fehler "Error processing frequencies for EDDT" aus. Im Debug-Log steht: 15/01/2012 09:18:02: 320 - iDepF : 119.63 15/01/2012 09:18:02: 320 - iDepFL : 119.63 15/01/2012 09:18:02: 320 - iAppF : 119.7 15/01/2012 09:18:02: 320 - iAppFL : 119.7 Wenn ich statt 119.63 auf 119.7 gehe, kann ich den Abflug über Approach abwickeln. Wer weiss Rat? Michael
×
×
  • Create New...