Jump to content

Carlos Pimentel

Members
  • Posts

    131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Carlos Pimentel

  1. Hi Kyle,

    Thanks for your care.

    1) I have no scenery in this area but I have "My Traffic X 5.4a", GEX and UTX for Europe

    2) My display settings are to the the maximums.

    3) My OS:

    ------------------

    System Information

    ------------------

    Time of this report: 9/26/2011, 17:41:57

    Machine name: CARLOS-PC

    Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.110622-1506)

    Language: Portuguese (Regional Setting: Portuguese)

    System Manufacturer: System manufacturer

    System Model: System Product Name

    BIOS: BIOS Date: 11/16/10 18:07:45 Ver: 08.00.15

    Processor: Intel® Core i7 CPU X 980 @ 3.33GHz (12 CPUs), ~3.3GHz

    Memory: 12288MB RAM

    Available OS Memory: 12280MB RAM

    Page File: 2441MB used, 15979MB available

    Windows Dir: C:\Windows

    DirectX Version: DirectX 11

    DX Setup Parameters: Not found

    User DPI Setting: 120 DPI (125 percent)

    System DPI Setting: 96 DPI (100 percent)

    DWM DPI Scaling: Disabled

    DxDiag Version: 6.01.7601.17514 32bit Unicode

    ------------

    DxDiag Notes

    ------------

    Display Tab 1: No problems found.

    Sound Tab 1: No problems found.

    Sound Tab 2: No problems found.

    Sound Tab 3: No problems found.

    Input Tab: No problems found.

    --------------------

    DirectX Debug Levels

    --------------------

    Direct3D: 0/4 (retail)

    DirectDraw: 0/4 (retail)

    DirectInput: 0/5 (retail)

    DirectMusic: 0/5 (retail)

    DirectPlay: 0/9 (retail)

    DirectSound: 0/5 (retail)

    DirectShow: 0/6 (retail)

    ---------------

    Display Devices

    ---------------

    Card name: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

    Manufacturer: NVIDIA

    Chip type: GeForce GTX 480

    DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC

    Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_06C0&SUBSYS_83491043&REV_A3

    Display Memory: 4063 MB

    Dedicated Memory: 1503 MB

    Shared Memory: 2559 MB

    Current Mode: 1680 x 1050 (32 bit) (60Hz)

    Monitor Name: SyncMaster 2232BW/2232GW/2232GW Plus,SyncMaster Magic CX2232GW(Digital)

    Monitor Model: SyncMaster

    Monitor Id: SAM0304

    Native Mode: 1680 x 1050(p) (59.883Hz)

    Output Type: DVI

    Driver Name: nvd3dumx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvd3dum,nvwgf2um,nvwgf2um

    Driver File Version: 8.17.0012.8026 (English)

    Driver Version: 8.17.12.8026

    DDI Version: 11

    Driver Model: WDDM 1.1

    Driver Attributes: Final Retail

    Driver Date/Size: 8/3/2011 12:50:00, 15064168 bytes

    WHQL Logo'd: Yes

    Hoping that this information has been helpful.

    Carlos

  2. Got the same problem today with Aerosoft LFMN and FS Global Ultimate.

    All you have to do is to install the Aerodrome Flattening Mesh for Nice.

    You`ll find this on the last FS Global DVD.

    Works for me :)

    You are correct. I did the same with full success!

    Thanks everyone for the great support.

  3. Hello Shaun,

    I confirm that the problem ceases to exist when the FSGlobal Europe is disabled.

    I will try again to get an appropriate response through the Pilot's Software. As I said earlier, this editor was arrogant in the first contact I had when I tried to get an adequate response in resolving the conflict between FSGlobal Utimate Europe and the scenery AS Madeira X.

    Let's see what happens this time.

    Anyway Shaun thank you very much once again for your support.

    Stephen

  4. You would need to contact FSGlobal about this.

    Hi Shaun,

    Thanks for your reply. You have reason but unfortunately I do not have good memories about the first and only time I contacted the tech support of FSGlobal with the aim of resolving the conflict between Madeira X and FSGlobal They blamed the scenario because it did not comply with the actual height of the terrain and they did not give me any more explanation on the subject!

    I think the conflict can only have arisen after I installed the Ultimate FSGlobal The Americas over the FSGlobal Africa Ultimate Europe.

    Anyway, I've uninstalled both FSGlobal but without success. X NICE remained with the problem.

    Cheers,

    Stephen

  5. I agree with your opinion. The scenery already worked well before. What I would like to know is how to exclude NICE X from influence of FSGlobal like the solution found for the scenery of MADEIRA X.

    Thanks for your support and congractulations for your great Airport Vehicle Repaint work. I'm waiting for LP-- :)

  6. This does not surprise me. 1 meter also worked well before but now this issue is emerging for which I do not find explanation.

    I have installed the following add-ons:

    FSGlobal, UTX and GEX. I've reinstalled the scenery in question several times but without success ... Any more suggestions?

    Many thanks,

    Stephen

  7. Hi again,

    While I wait for an opinion on this issue, I tell you the result of the test I made. I changed the mesh resolution of "1m" (typical for me) to "10m" and I stopped watching that anomaly.

    I wish that this fantastic scenario might accept the mesh resolution of 1m like all other scenarios that I have.

    Waiting always for a good answer, I thank you in advance for any solution.

    Stephen

  8. I´ve the same problem and more: After the update all the gates vanished. I just see its shadows.

    Thanks in advance,

    StephenGara

    Solution founded: Go to AESHELP (Activation of Airports) and "Resync/Repair" FS-ENZV Aerosoft Stavenger X.

    That's all :)

    Stephen

  9. sorry don´t know how to solve this, but when i update from simmarket.com , AES and The new version of Stavenger dosen´t work anymore.

    how to solve that???.

    tnx in advance.

    I´ve the same problem and more: After the update all the gates vanished. I just see its shadows.

    Thanks in advance,

    StephenGara

  10. Hello OPabst,

    First of all, congratulations for this superb job!

    I woold like to contribute with my modest feedback.

    Situation:

    Flight from EGKK to EGLC using the B737 NGX.

    My Traffic X with 45%.

    After landing I got an AOM.

    I tried again reducing traffic to 40%. Much better. I could taxi and park without problems. With AES 2.14, I didn't find any kind of restrictions before.

    The problems came later. The "follow me" car ran like mad, no more controlled by the taxi speed of the airplane.

    According the parking position at City London, all AES traffic comes from the buildings as a magic pass. It would be nice to change the course of AES traffic according to this specific situation.

    After ask for all AES services and in the midle of simultaneous operations, FSX froze and asked for a CTRL+ALT+DEL solution.

    Seems to me (sorry if I'm wrong) that we have AES 2.20 a bit more fat then 2.14. If it is the case, a "diet" is applicable?

    I could mention some more litle things as open doors with no drivers inside but I presume that you have in mind this kind of improvements in the next future.

    Thanks for your care and great profissionalism.

    Stephen

  11. Hello Stephen,

    If you have aircraft parked inside buildings then please make sure that the scenery is using the correct afcad as this problem is normally caused by another 3rd party AFCAD that can come with certain AI Traffic programs and these need to be disabled.

    Hello Shaun,

    First of all, thanks for your reply and your usual kindness to the costumers.

    About the refered airplanes crashs, let me quote a320wolf (Max):

    " Now with all the respect I have for Aerosoft I'm astonished of your reply about this issue: "disable the crash detection"!

    Ok it's probably the only solution but why we have to do that? No fix for this "bug" (if this is a bug) ? :-(

    Honestly I'd like to have a better support and answer from a company like Aerosoft".

    I subscribe entirely this opinion and I beg you to take it seriously in consideration.

    About aircrafts inside the buildings, your observation makes sense to me. I use My Traffic X. The problem now is to find a solution for this defective AFCAD next to Burkhard.

    Anyway, I will wait first for the solution of the crashs because without it, this scenario will be disabled on my FSX.

    Best regards,

    Stephen

  12. Ah, with you now. In that case if you do a search within this Fora you may well find your answer as I believe this was someone else's issue way back. Can't recall if it was resolved but I don't have the time to search.

    Have you tried turning off crash detection and trying it again, what's the result?

    I realy don't need this kind of support. As you too, I've no time to sustain this kind of conversation. Sorry, I use to be answering by Shaun, at least much more professional and regardful to the costumers.

    You know very well that this EGCL isn't finished. AFCAD is a joke. AI airplanes parked into the buildings!!! I've the 1.30 version. The last update I presume. Well I expect for something better if you want honour the quality of a paid work.

    Sorry to take your time. I forgave you already to take mine.

    Cheers,

    Stephen

  13. A lot more info wouldn't go amiss so as we can help.

    I will try to be more specific:

    Try to land and leave the RWY to the gates. You will see the airplane crash just when it goes into the taxiway with no visible reason.

    Sorry my english. It's not my mother tongue.

    I will be available for more clarifications if necessary.

    Stephen

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use