harpsi
-
Posts
346 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by harpsi
-
-
Just rename the file EGLCTRaffic.bgl to EGLCTRaffic.bgx
I already did that and I still have the traffic there...
harpsi
-
Hi
Is there a way to take the AI aircrafts from EGLC out? I have no AI traffic packages installed which means that those aircrafts are coming from the scenery itself...
Tks
harpsi
-
Hi
I tried to download version 1.01 from Stavanger but the zip file still shows version 1.00. Is it possible to correct this issue? Thanks.
harpsi
-
Hi
Is it possible to have PAKT from ORBX also modelled? I know that this airport has a lot of limitations because of all de level degrees of altitude, but at least a pushback car from gate 1 and 2 and 1 fuel car... Passengers modeling maybe not needed. Due to the limitations the pushback car would be fair enough
harpsi
-
DirectX in all flavours is updated from time-to-time. DirectX forms a core part of the installation system, so like Windows itself, it may need updating from time to time...
However, if all this is beyond you don't touch anything at all. If there is a problem with FSX you will soon know. If there isn't then there is no need to update.
Roger sir
harpsi
-
No you don't.
Just need the latest libraries.Latest libraries?
harpsi
-
Well, I understand all the explanations but none of them answer directly to my question. I would like an answer like "yes or no" to the question "do I need to install DirectX 9c over DirectX 11 or should I leave it like that?"
As I understood I should leave it like it is now...harpsi
-
Hi
There is something that I don´t understand and if the question is about FS addons from aerosoft or from other company, it is related to FSX as well, because nothing runs without FSX
DX11 is installed but DX9 is there as well? Do I need to run directX 9.0c and it will go over DX11? Or I just leave it like that? I am using Windows 7 ultimate 64 bits... I am using GTX580 as a videocard.
harpsi
-
Hi
It is known that windows 7 ultimate 64 bits comes with DirectX 11 installed.
1. Are aerosoft addons compatible with directX 11?
2. The same question for almost all other addons like flytampa, orbx, flight1 and so on...
3. If not, how can we uninstall DirectX11 and install directX 9.0c?
harpsi
-
Thanks for the advices
harpsi
-
Hi
I have my new system for FSX which is:
- Processor i7-2600k
- Mobo Asus P8Z68-V Pro
- Corsair Hydro 80
- Asus nvidia GTX580 1536MB DDR5
- G. Skill 2X4GB 1600 CL7
- one SSD harddisk for Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bits
- PSU TX950W
- Case Corsair Graphite CC600T
I would like to overclock it and the settings I am trying are these:
- bclk 100
- multiplier 49
- ram memory set to manual ddr3-1600
- PLL enabled
- EPU power disabled
- LLC ultrahigh
- VRM set to manual 350
- phase control and duty control (I don´t know what they are) set to extreme
- cpu capability set to 140%
- cpu voltage 1.470V
- dram voltage 1.60000
- vccio, cpu pll and pch voltage set to auto
- hypertreading disabled
- EIST and CPU C1E enabled
- CPU C3 and C6 reports disabled
>>> Temperatures under REAL TEMP 3.60 version: under 73ºC (between 60 and 73 more or less)
>>> Core voltage under CPU-Z: 1.456V
Any suggestion in order to get 4.9GHz stable or even go up to 5GHz?
And another question: should I run all aerosoft addons with for example PMDG NGX, ai traffic 100 %, AES and all those beautiful things as well as almost all the sliders to the right, at 25 or 30 frames minimum with those specs? I hope I can stabilize the processor at 4.9GHz... at least...
harpsi
-
The main idea is not to install FSX in the Program Files folder as Windows sees that as a protected section. Just make a new folder in the root of a drive.
Can it be: E:\Microsoft Games\Microsoft Flight Simulator X?
harpsi
-
Hi
One of the most important features I would like to see on the new simulator would be weather radar and terrain in all aircrafts. I see that many teams like PMDG, Level D, Airsimmer and so on are developing new aircrafts, more complex, but there are still some things that are missing in all of them, and these ones are for sure two of them. When we speak about weather radar, imediately comes the answer that it is not possible on Flight Simulator and bla bla bla...
Another issue which was never solved would be the possibility to have an afcad where one runway has one side closed for landing and the other side closed for takeoff or even for both operations or none of them. Schiphol is a good example of how you can never do a real afcad with just one file in order to reproduce all possible weather conditions.
A third issue just for now, would be possibility of pushback trucks for all AI aircrafts. It is very ugly that you can make your pushback with such a brilliant program like AES but you still have to see all other aircrafts making strange turns after pushback and before taxi.
harpsi
-
One-way runway use is a pain. And the construction of the star and what the determining runways need to be, is problematic as well. Especially when they are taking off in opposite directions, say 36L and 24. It can be done, but you don't want to end up with umpteen Afcads à la Cloud9...
It´s a choice. 100 % realistic operations at Schiphol are impossible with one afcad. Amost every runway is used for takeoff in one side and for landing in the other side. You can say that it is not 100 % confortable to have a lot of afcads in one package but you can´t say that they are not realistic. Anyway, there are a lot of afcads according to real life operations, so that everyone can choose whatever they like. And there are a lot of tricky things at this airport. For example without shortened runways you will never see take-offs at 36 L because it is too far from the aprons. And of course, it it not really realistic to have runway 09 always in use for TO. Just two examples of how difficult this airport is to configure.
harpsi
-
I saw the first screenshots, but I am not as enthousiastic as the rest of the people over here. In my opinion it looks like the Cloud9 scenery. And I am a bit disappointed that DreamFactoryStudio is making it. I was hoping for SimWings, especially for the performance.
I agree on that... Simwings or aerosoft are much much better than Dreamfactory Studio. We see the big difference between ESSA or EBBR and all the others from simwings or aerosoft.
hapsi
-
I can confirm the frame rate stays above 30 with 100% Ai sliders and WOAI traffic filling the vicinity up after 15mins which is good, excellent optimization.. But unless you have 0% when 22R is in use this happens, which is bad, ruins the whole thing
Can you write your comuter specifications please? Tks
harpsi
-
Casper, I get 50 fps on the Nice scenery we just released. How much more fps do you want? How much more detail you want to see? And that's on a<$750 machine, not some high end monster.
But where are AI aircrafts? Just 3 or 4... I would like to see frame rate with 50 aircrafts one the ground and sliders to maximum. If you still get 30 FPS then tell me what is your machine(yes, we are not talking about EGLL or EDDF where I would be happy with 20 or 25). I would like to switch to FSX as well...
harpsi
-
We see a growing demand from there and without a doubt the airports there are growing a lot faster then airports in Europe or the US.
I hope you can do airports like LTBA, LTAI, OLBA, HECA, HESH and so on.
harpsi
-
Or perhaps there is a way to remove the default airport building files?
I will try to uninstall GAP1 to see what happens...
harpsi
-
Hi
Between all those addons, is there oine which makes all the airport buildings invisible? I have a lot of instalations but I don´t know if there are any files left from uninstalations...
harpsi
-
Try to reinstall and not mess with the AFCAD. It's only workable in AFX, not the old AFCAD2.
Check here: http://www.forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?showtopic=20080
I did some changes with AFX only. But this would be not the reason to have default buildings on the scenery...
harpsi
-
Hi
I installed Arlanda scenery and I have all the default buidlings in the scenery. How can I remove them?
harpsi
-
We know it is a beautiful airport (and certainly on a great location), but it is currently not on our lists. Mainly because the local market is not very large and that determines the commercial possibilities of a project to a large degree.
Aerosoft always talks about "local market not enough". Well, does this mean that you can only make airports from germany, UK, france, spain and USA? I see that except one project here and there like Lisboa, Madeira or Stockholm, sceneries are always going to the same countries where we already have lots of them...
harpsi
-
Hi,
I invest some hours to try to get a afcad that will work (much) better as the original one, it is not final, no offical update, but maybe can be a base for future updates.
- Most Gate assignments should be ok
- Holdshort notes are added
- Startuplocations moved
- Runways width reduced
- Gate radius optimized, but maybe the gate assignments are not perfect yet.
Please make a backup of the original one before you replace the file.
NOTE: Don't touch this file with Lee Swordys Afcad tools, this will damage the file (AFX is OK)
Hi
Where can I get this AFX tool?
harpsi
EGLC AI
in Aerosoft Scenery
Posted
It solved if I disable EGLC airport from VFR scenery. Tks.
harpsi