alehead
-
Posts
639 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by alehead
-
-
No worries Mathijs, particularly as the thread you were looking for was directly below at the time you posted...
Cheers to Hero93 for the information. I had forgotten that little switch. Nomen est omen...
A
-
All interesting stuff about the Dublin project, but it has absolutely nothing to do with my thread. Mathijs, I think you went and answered the wrong thread here...
Thanks to Angelique for the information and reasoning. Of course, ASN's decision is final, but it has little effect on stopping content grabbers. At the end of the day, all it succeeds in doing is annoying me as the reader, as mentioned already. Penalising the average reader in an attempt to stop the exceptionally small minority with a method that does not stop them anyway is an odd decision in my mind...
Perhaps you could programme the links to open in a new tab of the browser, like HTML target="_blank" or something, so I at least keep the home page and do not have to reload it again and again.
Keep up the good work either way, thanks.
A
-
I couldn't find a specific forum for this, so I'll put it in General.
I would be interested to know why right clicking was disabled on the ASN site. I really miss the ability to open stories in a new tab, as the function to open in a new tab has not always been implemented by the web designer...
Andrew
-
1
-
-
It is certainly a lesson. Taking off with four adults in a light plane at altitude is always going to be a dicey affair, particularly on warmer days. This is ideal material for a "how not to do it" story. Luckily for all involved nobody died. He should have aborted much earlier on when he failed to get off the ground properly. That was an extremely long run to take off, the alarms should have screaming in his ears at that point...
A
-
1
-
-
Hi,
to sort out this problem please send me your config files...
a) the ASE log files => C:\Aerosoft\Launcher
the dll.xml and FSX.cfg => C:\Users\"User name"\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\FSXc) a copy of the registry key => [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\aerosoft\Toulouse X]
Please send the information to andreas.muegge@aerosoft.de
Thanks
Putting the stuff together for you right now...
Just to let you know, the reg key is not Toulouse X but Aerosoft-Airport Toulouse...
And I am seeing some error in the ASE log...
OK, zipped and sent...
A
-
Thanks Mathijs.
Please do not hesitate to ask if you require any further details on setup or otherwise.
A
-
Where should those .blob files exactly be?
A
-
Thanks for dropping in. Glad I am not the only one, for what it is worth...
A
-
OK, I have now uninstalled and reinstalled (as Administrator) no fewer than 3 times, the last time with a new download. There is something wrong with your new version of Toulouse. The activation routine works normally, whichever method I use, be it launcher or ASEData.dll via the FSX menu...
The scenery shows up partially, with the red wording hovering over the runway and a large number of key buildings missing!
This is frustrating.
A
-
Could it be that the new uploaded version has another problem?
I refer you to my other thread:
Andrew
-
No, force reloading through the scenery library has no effect. I am missing a number of buildings and have that message pasted in the air above the runways.
Thanks for the help, but this is a more fundamental issue. There is something blocking here, probably the dll itself...
A
-
Here is a screenshot that illustrates the issue with the activation...
As you can see, the ASE.dll is running and indicates that Toulouse is activated... yet that red block is visible and a large number of key buildings are missing...
Please sort this...
A
-
Oh, and before you ask...
Running Win7 Home Premium, the scenery installer was run as Administrator, FSX is on its own drive...
A
-
Listed as Version 1.00
But I have the "scenery inactive, please activate first" red wording over the runways and no buildings...
What is this?
I cannot activate in Launcher as the scenery is listed as already active, I cannot use the new plug in (whose existence I do not understand...) as the scenery is also listed there as being active...
I understand wanting to protect your IP, but it has to work... (with everyone... I know a lot have the scenery already and it is working...)
Andrew
-
Ist die Szenerie auch in der Szeneriebibliothek von FSX aktiviert? Ich rede nicht vom Launcher. Ich kann mich vage erinnern, dass ich bei der Installation von den beiden Polish Airports manuell die Szenerie anmelden musste.
Es hat mich etwas überrascht, da heutzutage fast alle Szenerien automatisch bei der Installation angemeldet werden.
Ist nur eine Idee, vielleicht hilft es, ich sehe in den Screenshots, dass Texturen fehlen.
A
-
I had an idea this was coming, but no idea that it would be so soon. I will be flying into Toulouse for real in about a month, so I should know exactly what it looks like beforehand...
Looking good everyone, looking good...
A
-
Heinz, einige von uns haben schon längst die AFCAD Datei aktualisiert. Ich habe ungefähr 2 Minuten dafür gebraucht. Sicher könnte einer von uns die Datei hier hochladen und Sie stellen es zur Verfügung für alle, die es haben wollen.
So schnell werden ILS Frequenzen nicht geändert, sonst gäbe es Chaos...
Andrew
-
1
-
-
Strange...
Ich habe FSX Gold mit Acceleration installiert... ich habe bis jetzt keine Probleme mit den ILS für 06 oder 24 feststellen können.
Andrew
-
Bevor man einfach schreibt, "tut mir leid, kann nicht helfen," schreibt man lieber nichts...
Ohne weitere Infos von Ihnen ist es schwierig überhaupt mal ansatzweise das Problem anzugehen, mindestens ein Screenshot hätte hier sehr geholfen...
Hut ab an den von Ihnen genannten Nutzer... vielleicht kannte er das von Ihnen erwähnte Problem...
AE
-
Didn't do the job for me, though I appreciate the effort of yours and Peter's to help out here.
As regards the scenery.cfg, with pleasure Mathijs...
I would prefer to send it you as a PM though...
A
-
Cheers Mathijs...
Will check it out tonight when I have a moment spare...
Thanks
Andrew
-
You're welcome Daniel!
I am glad that not only I can profit from this little workaround for the time being...
Thanks to Herman too... there is obviously some black magic going on with our systems Daniel, as other s are obviously not affected.
Thanks too Mathijs for looking into this. You need any more help, screenshots, or info on my setup, let me know, and I will pass it on...
A
-
Just to add, I tried Mathijs' suggestion of running with a new fsx.cfg, straight out of the box...
With the cvxEDNY_WOOD-NORTH.bgl file active, I still have the trees at the end of 24...
Going back to my other workaround, as it is the only thing that works so far...
Andrew
EDIT: The new fsx.cfg I ran with had no max objects per cell tweak...
-
OK
I disabled my entire 3rd party addon list... and tried a few configurations...
Disabling everything, including Ultimate Terrain X Europe, other than EDNYX and AerosoftAFD, I get:
Different trees, as UT X Europe is gone...
Now, I switched all the3rd party addon stuff back on, except EDNYX:
No trees are placed in the "offending locations"
Now I reenabled EDNYX and upped the autogen to max:
And to finalize this series, here is a screenshot of the same view, though with the file cvxEDNY_WOOD-NORTH.bgl removed from the directory (I have it backed up in a different location):
If you ask me, it has something to do with this cvxEDNY_WOOD-NORTH.bgl file... What autogen settings do you have Herman?
Andrew
EDIT: Just to clarify that the autogen setting on the last shot was back to my usual dense setting, and is not at the MAX setting that the picture above it displays. I also use a "number of objects per cell" line in the fsx.cfg to reduce the building and tree autogen for various slider settings, which has a positive effect on the appearance of the terrain, without built up areas having too many objects and thus causing choppiness...
Aerosoft News
in English
Posted
You know, I was thinking about Angelique's reply...
As an ex professional photographer I can fully understand wanting to protect content, whatever it may be. However, placing material online, regardless of techniques to thwart it, content will be copied, re-posted, uploaded under a different author and so on and so forth.
And then I see that ASN has a Facebook page... a lot of content is set to public, so it can be viewed at least without having to register with them. Either way, the content use clauses on Facebook have led to me no longer posting any material whatsoever there...
I find the restrictive policy of ASN right clicking not in balance with the use of Facebook... of course this is my opinion only, and I do not expect anyone to agree with my opinion, just to accept that I may have a different opinion than others...
Could it at least be changed that the initial click on a link opens up in a new tab, instead of going to a new page in the same tab, whcih then links to the actual content in a new tab? I know I could use CTRL and left click, but it is not second nature to the large majority of Net users to use the keyboard while navigating sites...
A