Jump to content

wingview

Members
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wingview

  1. With 2.21 still no push back with the tow less truck!!! But heyyyy who cares. Just a minority who has this problem and even no reply what's so ever from Pabst about this.

    What's the use of this program if you can't use the most important thing, which is the push back. The eye candy comes first these day's.

    I'm off.

    After a zillion reply's you should know my name by now.............................

  2. Hello,

    It seems that I'm not the only one with the "fork" pusher problem. For some it's resolved, not for me I'm afraid. But it's both for FS9 and FSX and all at the same time (after pls release pbrake). Also the doors of the pusher behind the NG are closed and our friend is standing next to it on the left waiting.

    Cheers,

    John

  3. Oliver,

    I'm using AES from the very beginning and with all the updates it woked like a charm, never had any problems so no adjustments. Since 2.20 started I only have problems which can't be solved (towbar less pusher and now also the sound) so it seems after 3 updates. If you can't unlucky for me, I'm back to 2.13 if that is the case.

    Regards,

    John

    FS9 and Win7

  4. The Values looks not ok for me, because the nosegear is far in front of Door1 and the MD11 has a Nosewheel, which is very far to the rear.

    So, the issue I saw had also to do with problems for the rampagent to move from the position he waits to the nosegear position, where he stands when the pusher moves back.

    Ok, but why does it work with the pusher with a tow bar? That one works just fine.

  5. Hi Oliver,

    Thx for your reply!

    I tried the 737 again, but that particulair vehicle doesn't show up. I also tried the default 747 and there it works perfect. Maybe handy to have the numbers from the MD11 pax:

    [Descr]

    Type=MD11

    [Geom]

    Nosegear= 20.65

    Door1=-3.05, 14.85, 4.8, 5

    Door4=-2.55,-18.1, 4.85,-5

    Front= 1.75, 11.25, 2.6

    Rear= 1.55,-13.6, 2.65

    Ramp agent is on the left looking to the tow less vehicle and after saying release parking brake. That's where it all stops.

    Cheers,

    John

  6. Hi Oliver,

    Congrats with the 5 years. Good stuff!

    Anyway, all works fine (GS9 and PMDG MD11), but it won't start the pushback. All equipment is gone as it should, pushbacker is on its place, breaks released but even in 10 minutes nothing happends anymore. With that I have the same problem as in post #30. Never had this problem before in the previos version also with Win7.

    Regards,

    John

    Ps. I'm Back to 2:13 and that works normal.

  7. There seems to be an issue here with what your saying, what is classed as not working and what is working! Example; As Microsoft are always updating there products especially there Operating Systems with updates and fixes, at what point is the customer entitled to compensation.

    This amazed me totally. So Aerosoft is now looking what kind of legal stuff Microsoft would use if they wouldn't update? I hope I misunderstood you. If I understand you correctly then it's pretty simple:

    1. A product must work properly when this was bought.

    2. A product must fullfill what it's suppost to do. Ie, what it shows on the box and/or in advertisement(s).

    Both is not the case. For example it states the requirements what kind of minimum system you need to properly run this scenery. I only see reactions of people who have a higher system then required.

    Then if you look at the "details" and "features" what this up to date scenery would have, then I can tell you there is a lot of work to do to meet what is promised. I don't have to tell you what. The only flaw I can think off is that the bridges, with the technologie at that time it came out, should be like Leipzig. It is part of the taxi way which should be with "realistic rendered textures". Another thing could be that the minimum requirement is when you use the default planes. But that doesn't say anywhere and commercial wise might not be handy because (almost) everybody is using a PMDG etc plane.

    Then another thing. Microsoft is sending me updates almost every day. They will stop doing this when other companies who use the software of MS won't use a certain OS anymore. I think that XP in the comming years will have that. In the mean time has MS updated this OS for years (also with SP's)!

    I don't know the legal system in Germany but here you would go down big time for the reasons 1 and 2. I would guess that in Germany it wouln't be that much different. I won't sue you for a E 25,- product, but the excuses used above is very low and for your customers not really an advertisement. In general I would have believed that Aerosoft would have done more with this too long lasting issue.

    Kind regards,

    John

  8. If you are working with Windows 7 you have to open FS as administrator. Probably FS has not that icon, but when you use Active sky you'll see it. Run it from there. Then check youre scenery libary and add the ones you're missing. Close FS and you'll see them in AES again.

    The next times after, again run it as an administrator and all go fine (with me anyway).

    I don't know why this is happening, but for me the solution.

    Reg,

    John

  9. I have MegaAirport Amsterdam for FS9 and started the pushback on Gate G5 no problem. After turning left and align with the taxi line it starts to move forward and stops not as normal as on other other airports. It takes really a while till it stops and requires Parking Breaks.

    Gate G-5 and below is a push pull one because of the jet blast when they use brake away power (ie starting taxi). G-7 and 9 is a normal push.

    John

  10. @Gerard,

    Sorry for the late response but I was a short time out off the FS scene.

    Anyway, if EHAM wouldn't work on youre system... :huh::lol: (I guess i7)

    Many people are working with a lower end Pc and it should work for them as well. Look at the min requirements:

    System requirements for FSX:

    •Microsoft Flight Simulator X (Acceleration or SP2)

    •Windows XP / Vista or 7

    •Processor with 3.0 GHz (Core2Duo Intel requested)

    •2 GB RAM

    •3D graphic card with 256 MB, recommended 512 MB

    •Installations-Size: 300 MB

    System requirements for FS2004:

    •Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004 with Update 9.1

    •Windows 7, Vista or XP SP2

    •Pentium IV 2,6 GHz or higher

    •2 GB RAM

    •3D Graphics card with 256 MB (512 MB recommend)

    •Installations-Size: 300 MB

    I can asure you that these requirements are (still) way too low to get it running well (day or night). This scenery was, what I believe, never tested on those machines. If it was, it was done with default planes and who's using those?

    With that a lot of mistakes in taxi signs, B-apron etc. it was too early at the market.

    If you compare the PMDG 737 and the MD-11, with almost the same FPS, but with lots of more features and better textures, DF should have done a far better job than this one.

    I also bought a new Pc (Core i5 760, 4 GB and GF9800), also working with FS9. When Cloud9 is performing better in all way's, I'll stick to that one. With FSX not sure...

    King regards,

    John

  11. a lot of people suffer with the framerates

    if you read all the threads

    perhaps they will fix it in the upcoming update

    but you wont hear nothing untill they decide to come out

    Aerosoft should have taken this one out of the market untill all issues were solved. Even though they are not the developing party, I won't buy anything anymore (at release date) before I see what the comments are on this forum. This because Aerosoft won't test what they sell and then you can get this kind of trouble.

    Edit: The developers had always problems with FR related issues. I doubt very much that they will, or even can, solve the Eham scenery into a smooth one!

  12. First of all, great scenery etc!!!

    Is it possible to change the brake marks at the gates in oil marks and to make the bridges elevated (like Leipzig)? As some posts before, cars just dissapear. Also the high way at 18r just stops and with wing view you see the default scenery and the high way starts all of a sudden. Some more cars would be nice (always traffic jams all around the airport), but no priority ofcourse! Others already said the other things (some a bit blunt... :wacko: ).

    Regards,

    John

    @Robin. At SPL they don't cut the grass everyday ^_^ so that's probably why the edges aren't sharp as you mentioned.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use