Recently we have seen a lot of codes used to unlock our products being offered for discounted prices. Almost all of them are bought using stolen credit cards. These codes will all be blocked by our systems and you will have to try to get your money back from the seller, we are unable to assist in these matters. Do be very careful when you see a deal that is almost too good to be true, it probably is too good to be true.

Jump to content

KAPTEJNLN1

members
  • Content Count

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About KAPTEJNLN1

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Groundwork
  1. HELLO FELLOWS LOKK AT THE PIC AND SE WHAT IS WRONG AND SE MY NEW VERSION :-)
  2. Well it should bee more realistic yes, but people that don´t know much about how the real plane works, should also be abele to fly like in FSX, but only whit short cuts or what you call them. Whit out learning center as the info can be found on the web!! But i don´t hope Aerosoft creates different ratings for the simulator, like fsx not that there was a big diference but in the new production i think the the price of the finished product would be expensive for much real feel. The best way is to say 1 version whit all includedet, then wee all pay for it and it would be beter for Aerosoft, if we should get an new version in the future. If they want and se the market for it. Whish i have had the edducation to join the Aerosoft team on the new sim. As my bigest whish is gone for now, as money stops me from being pilot.
  3. well i think the most of us have spendt a lot of money and i have spendta lot to. But i think new things working in a hole new way is much better as microsoft was far behind in file format and game engine. I have also seen some places where the team behind the fs has got the messeges that add ons companys would not crate more add ons for fs if they dont starts from ground 0. And you cant continue that way and mabee therefor they stopped. With that in mind i hope Areosoft would create something new, so they can update it a bit in the future and when time and money is to it start all over again. so they dont make same misstake, know it costs money but if we dont suport them we loose them to create the best game for people there realy cant fly in the real world or fans. Also if it can be better then fsx it would be good and Aerosoft gets money and mabee new people would join FS. becaus of the falier whit FSX i dont want it anymore as problem after problem. And grafic is not as good as it could and slowing the pc becaus of the fileformat and all the other security things microsooft have. Have a nice day to all
  4. Right i agree and it was also something like that i was tryeing to say.
  5. It looks nice but we also have to remember that the fsx add ons should work in the new sim as far as i remember, but whit a converting program like x-plan where you can use some of the things from fsx in x-plane as i have understandet. But i think it would slow the progres insted of starting from point 0 as microsoft haven´t done so and therefor the big load on the processer. And then Aerosoft would get a new problem like microsoft did just in the near feauture. Becaus if Aerosoft can create a hole new sim whit the newest things it would be more poplar i think becaus, I dont think i am talking for my self but the way FSX work it all the time creates problems for the user oom error instal error and all the other things. Caused by update on update and the new windows as FSX is like windows as they only updates and at some point the pc cant deal whit it anymore. I am so tired of instaling FSX as it newer runs 100 % whit out chrashing and i have an good pc whit no problems in any other games, that requers hig end pc. and there fore if Aerosoft cant get it working like other games people would like to use it. And i would say i know things costs money and i would say that i would pay for an sim there is working good and some of the new stuf, and i think other want to do the same. I realy hope Aersoft create the best sim ever, and fs 2012 be an best seller by sim games.
  6. You are right it could be nice, and about it would bee difficult year maybee but the sim would should bee abel to run better then FSX if they create the sim like all modern games, so the pc only works whit the things you are seeing, insted of the way FSX work as it runs the hole world and slowing the pc. The used file format in fsx that needs more procesing and ram capacity then all other games, just becaus of the update on update from the earlier simulators as far as i have !!understandet!!. so yes i think whit a new way like modern gamse it would work, but you stil need a very good pc to run it i think, and whit other adjustments. It could be nice like all other things there have been talking about, but again it´s all about money and costumers need. and myself i am more interested in aerodynamic, weather as fsx need some of that, to get realistic.
  7. well there could be problems at departure becaus how should the aircraft pull the nose up as there is nothing that can tell the autopilot to do so becaus the speed and lift are diferent caused by turbulence and other facts. At the moment there is no ILS for departure. so the aircraft have no indication about how it should controle the aircraft.
  8. WELL IF I SHOULD SAY SOMETHING I THINK IT COULD BE BECAUS IF YOU GET BIRDSTRIKE OR SOMETHING ELS THE PLANE CANT HANDEL IT BECAUS IF YOU NORMALY GET BIRDSTRIKE YOU DISENGAGE THE AUTOPILOT BECAUS YOU HAVE TO SHUT THE ENG DOW AND CORECT THE ARICRAFT WHIT RUDDER AND HOW IS THE AIRCRAFT GONA HANDEL THAT BECAUS ANY LOSS OF POWER CAN BE A BIG PROBLEM I KNOW YOU CAN FLY WHIT ONLY 1 ENG BUT WOULD THE AUTOPILOT ACT AS FAST AS AN PILOT DO. AS AUTOPILOT IS ONLY PROGRAMED HARDWARE/SOFTWARE AND IT IS HARD TO PROGRAM SITUATIONS.
  9. weel year, i am also talking about boeing that is tested at 60 degrees. but the new airbus are also tested at 60 and -45 degrees as far as i know. but if it was whit lower fuel i dont know. and about the JetA1 fuel it could be an danger whit fire if there is a leak then you tank the airplane i dont know how flame able it is.
  10. WELL IT COULD BE BAD CLIMB PROFORMANCE AND BECAUS OF YOU ARE TO CLOSE TO THE LIMIT AND A GOOD PILOT WOULD therefore NOT TAKE OFF. because the aircraft is tested at 60 degres c. so it must be something at the airport or infligh It could be something whit the runway as far as i know from an test where they used a 747 where they got an car driving behind and blow it away then they say they must only have the enginge at full power for 2 min els the runway would be blown away to.
  11. well it sounds grate that aerosoft is 1 step closer to the goal of creating a new flightsim. 1 thing i mean you shoul include in your sim is runway lights and approch light insted of microsofts small lights that is inthe air. if you understand i know it dosent looks realistic by default lights in all airports. but whit new add ons they can chages it as some add-onn compays do to day. and create a better system as the project i was working on at the start of 2009. i was not abel to get the glasse to the runway light glow i neaded to use the standart light from the microsoft flight sim. as the effect only works in night donw and dusk. best Regards, Lars N
  12. WELL YOU CAN GET Canaryan airports to fs2004 and FSX but from other publisher. I dont think they update it. but dont know its only sim-wings there can tell. You can get Lanzarote and Fuerteventura to FSX as i know but again from other publisher! Have a nice day
  13. well at the german web page of aerosoft, they say jun without guarantee in the pre-order section. but as i walways say, it comes when the time is right. It is better to wait and get the maximum of the product. But i can´t wait to :-) Whis you all a nice day.
  14. Hello there i hope it is not to late to say. but first of all it looks so nice i cant wait for it like all others but yes take the time it is better to wail longer and then get the best insted of beeing to fast. I dont know if the plan was to include runway lights like in Brussels, but i hope you also would include such an object. As it was a mising thing and now there were taxi light looks so wounderful why not runwaylight. I have been working on runwaylights to my own flight sim airport project. and i started as i mean it was missing. well it looks nice in my project but plz include it in the new airport. Well the biggest problem was to get light on the runway then there was fog or other low viserbilety, becaus in brussels the object dont light up at fog as i remember. but whit the right help i got it working, as there is no indication to the object about low viserbilety. There for i got an litel light (mdl file) where i used a program named MDL tweaker to give it a nav 2 frq. hope you can use the idear to somthing. I would help if i can :-) see my demo video:
  15. Hello there i am planing a release of my SAMOS add-on and i have been using some of your objects to fsx: Mega Airport Brussels X, DillinghamX, Mega Airport Budapest and last of all Mega Airport London Heathrow X i dont remember it if i have used heatrow dont tink so but ok. i have createt a airport where i use some of yours objects to createt it becaus i dont live on samos but love to fly to the destination whit the special inflight becaus of the mountens. then i nead the promisions to use them and give my project as free ware, the good thing is tat the people ther get it has to be the owner of you projects ells it wouldent work becaus i only give them a file there tels the simulator to open them and of corse if you dont have it no fun 8). i dont know yet if it gets out ore i keep it for my self.
×
×
  • Create New...