Jump to content

gavinbarbara

Members
  • Posts

    83
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by gavinbarbara

  1. Hi,

    The developer (me in this case) would have no problem with an FS9 update whatsoever.

    The problem is the photo-realistic bitmap, which already has it's max resolution in FS9. The new FSX version is almost 3 times higher in resolution and this is something you cannot do for FS9.

    Thus the FS9 update would have no real meaning, apart from adding the "SkyCourt". But I will add that soon.

    regards

    Andras

    Andras

    Thank you very much for replying - that's very kind of you. Additionally thanks for making this scenery in the first place, I really am glad that I purchased it.

    Best regards.

    Gavin

  2. Not at this moment. It's just a much smaller market.

    So why did you recently release a version of Zurich for FS9? That seems rather inconsistent with the above comment.

    Please don't misunderstand, I purchased LHBP for FS9 'as is' and am very happy with it. I don't feel I am in any way entitled to anything more - I got what I paid for. But just please speak to us in a straightforward way. If there isn't going to be an FS9 update because the developer doesn't want to do one (no probs with that) then please just say so.

  3. I read this today 'From now on the download-version of Mega Airport Amsterdam contains original and exclusive licensed Lufthansa Airport charts. Customers, who will buy the coming box-version of Amsterdam,can hold the printed charts in their hands.'

    Will existing download customers be able to download these charts?

    Gavin

  4. Oh dear, I don't think I'm going to be much use to you:

    1 x Main comp for FS9 and a little FSX but it's not quite macho enough.

    1 x My laptop for working

    1 x Fiancée's laptop for working

    And that's it. It would appear we are quite stone-age ;-)

  5. Hello Schipol people :)

    Since Shaun has started that thread and since it sounds like there's going to be some rework of that nice scenery, I feel the urge to point at what I think is a major issue with Mega Amsterdam.

    There are lots of small details that could be improved when you are right on the airport, but there in my opinion a serious problem when you're actually flying toward the airport.

    It must have to do with the LOD architecture of the scenery, and perhaps, with the 'under the sea level status of Schipol.

    Better than a long post full of typos, those screenies will show the problem:

    eham_1.jpg

    eham_2.jpg

    eham_3.jpg

    eham_4.jpg

    eham_5.jpg

    eham_6.jpg

    eham_7.jpg

    3 nautical miles from the airport and no 3d objects is abnormal, and that is a problem. I know some bits of the makings of a scenery, LODs etc, but here that's really exagerated, and that must be sorted.

    Always difficult to compare with other sceneries, however if we look at other mega airports from AS the story is a whole different: Madrid, Heathrow, De gaulle, Frankfurt, Brussel (same deisgner) etc,

    as far as 10NM away you can already see the main buildings first LODs.

    There is also something wrong with how AI aircrafts remain untextured in Mega Amsterdam: I know some AI models loose their texture from the distance and their lowest LODs, but here, even at 1 mile

    they're still naked. That should really be worked out, I hope Cornel reads this.

    Seeing a vast empty area filled with naked AI aircrafts instead of an airport, when you're on final at less than a few nuatical miles and few hundreds feets is defintiely not pleasant and not the way it should be. Again, no other Mega Airports from Aerosoft looks like this.

    In fact, I am thinking that the buildings popping up in view like they do, making the whole think look quite weird, is because they are not built with LODs.

    Which nowadays, cant be.

    Hope this help us all.

    Regards

    I have the same problems as above :(

    I don't have these issues with EDDF, LFPG and EGLL. Hope EHAM can be brought up to their standard.

    • Upvote 1
  6. The airports planned for FSX are a nice collection and i'm sure will be worthy of the effort and detail that goes into them. The cries however from some here about lack of Dutch airports for FS9 seems a bit daft as there are truly excellent versions available, including Schipol, and for free at the NL2000 site.

    http://www.nl-2000.com/nuke/

    I'm not promoting them or saying one is better than the other, just the fact all the major airports mentioned here and a considerable number of GA airports and military ones are built and fully functional. Download V.3 as it's truly excellent

    Very true.

    But not all of us want all of The Netherlands. Just an Aerosoft standard EHAM.

    Thanks for the link though, much appreciated. :)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use