Recently we have seen a lot of codes used to unlock our products being offered for discounted prices. Almost all of them are bought using stolen credit cards. These codes will all be blocked by our systems and you will have to try to get your money back from the seller, we are unable to assist in these matters. Do be very careful when you see a deal that is almost too good to be true, it probably is too good to be true.

Jump to content

AirbusCG

members
  • Content Count

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

AirbusCG last won the day on July 24

AirbusCG had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

139 Excellent

About AirbusCG

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Airwork

Recent Profile Visitors

1299 profile views
  1. My full review will look different Oliver Thanks for the screenshot. Things look quite a bit different than in real world, I hope those colours can be corrected before release. Especially since you promise carefully colour corrected scenery on the productpage. Ps.: No offense of course, I just want to help you getting a better product
  2. Where's all the vegatation on the airport? The real one is full with plants, bushes, etc. On the screenshots on the productpage I can not see a single one of them! Even the runways have it on their less used parts in real life: THR 03R: Was it still missing when you took the shots from the beta? I trust you did not omit it in the final release version. The whole apron and gate area also seems much to clean from the screenshots. I took this video a couple of days ago on appraoch, just look at how those taxiways and the apron and especially gates look like.
  3. Because it is not. Flightsimming tries to make us believe it is, in real life it is a LOT more complex however and there is not a single one FS addon that depicts real cost index calculations correctly. In my airline (737NG) we fly a certain CI. Nonetheless on each and every flight we fly different speeds. Things like the wind components come into calculation for example. More headwind means you fly faster at the same CI. More tailwind means you go slower. Then the aircrafts weight will mean a dramatic speed change. We have an automatic CI compliance monitoring in place in our aircraft and if we change the airlines CI into another one we will trigger an automatic mail to our company for non compliance. So we simply enter a different cruise wind to force it to fly faster. Enter 200kt headwind and it'll fly M.80 even at CI1. 200kt tailwind and it'll go M.73 at CI100. I have not seen a single FS addon yet where I could do this. Not even PMDG or FS Labs.
  4. So something is probably wrong with your graphic card. Does it have the memory required by Lockheeds system requirements for P3D?
  5. Mit der "Kiste" ist garnix los, sie tut genau was sie soll... wenn der Inboundwaypoint noch 60NM draußen ist, obwohl das ILS erst bei etwa 30 eingestellt werden sollte. Klassischer Pilot Error. Im FS Labs hast Du den Flugplan richtig sequenziert, daher läuft alles wie erwartet. Im Screenshot mit dem Aerosoft Bus hast Du den Plan nicht richtig sequenziert, daher das Problem. Und in deiner ersten Reihe Screenshots ist schon durch den Speed Bug bei 0 klar zu erkennen, dass Du eine Menge Eingabefehler machst. Sehr gut, dann flieg ihn bitte auch entsprechend, dann wird er auch entsprechende korrekte Einstellungen vornehmen. Bei mir kommt der Bus übrigens perfekt mit Navigraph klar, das Problem sitzt also, wie meistens, 30cm vor dem Monitor.
  6. wow, you post a thread at 8 o'clock in the evening and at 11PM you complain about missing support already. You must live in a very nice world where everything always happens immediately, I also want to get there! Could you advise me on the right way?
  7. Congratulations, you have a broken P3D installation.
  8. Absolutely agree, it is great to see SODE findings its way into Aerosoft products. I only hope SODE will never be discontinued or let down by its developers otherwise at one point we might all be left without jetways...
  9. wow, so you order something on good Friday, get it FOR FREE (!), and complain that it is only activated just one business week thereafter? And then you obviously did not even follow Aerosofts procedures and advised them of the order number to get it activated? So your thanks for the free order is a comparison to ISIS terrorist group? Is this your way to say thank you? I was about to write that you, sir Jetranger, maybe should be delivered to ISIS to see what you are even talking about... but then again I don't want to come down to your level. If I was Aerosoft I would for sure end all business relations to you and delete your account with them.
  10. I can do that for you! Where can I send the 500.000€ invoice for the development cost? P.D: Thrust me!
  11. Makes me wonder why it works for myself and all others... I have no problems with your mentioned sceneries. mopperle and masterhawk don't have problems either. It just has to be something on your side, but as somebody with 30 years of computerexperience you probably know that yourself.
  12. Aerosoft hält derzeit Strategiemeetings ab, in die das gesamte Team involviert ist. Daher kann ich mir gut vorstellen, dass das Einführen neuer Produkte diese Woche etwas verspätet geschieht. Bisher hat Aerosoft aber alle DD Produkte (bis auf New York, wenn ich mich nicht irre, da Aerosoft ja selbst ein New York hat) verkauft, daher denke ich mal mit EETN wird es genauso sein.
  13. You did Oliver, WADD -> Bali and that is sold by Aerosoft. I think the developer was A-Flight. It's really a top notch airport!
  14. So when did the other developers announce GCTS? Like two months ago? Those of you who ever developed a scenery will easily be able to tell that what you see in the screenshots is at least close to a year of work. So simwings at least worked on it for a year, bought the photoscenery (a whole island costs in excess of 10.000€ for good quality images like we have seen in La Palma!) and now they should throw all of that away? Let them release it and then compare the different sceneries. My only issue is that GCTS wasn't communicated earlier, but it's easy to see that work has been going on here for at least a year since it's that close to release. Had they told us about the scenery earlier nobody would have complained. There is a thread going on over at fs developer, maybe if simply every developer, even if completly anonymous if they don't want to reveal what they're working on, simply announced "I'm working on xxxx airport" in there we wouldn't have any issues. Merry Christmas to all of you
  15. Do you have GSX Mathijs? I also found that installing GSX I got a whole bunch more crashes than prior to installing it. Now I uninstalled it and my sim is stable again.
×
×
  • Create New...