Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation since 05/15/21 in all areas
-
I can confirm the A330 has priority at this moment.36 points
-
The issue is fixed on my end. I asked my testers to check it now and then I will send it to Microsoft for adding to the marketplace. Unfortunately, I don't have any influence (other than saying please please please) to speed up the process on their end. The reason for the issue is, that apparently none of the whole testing group uses a single axis controller. Therefore we simply didn't come across the problem. This really was unnecessary and I am the only one to blame here. I apologize to everybody for this mishap. I'm going to lock this thread now and write up a guide29 points
-
V1.0.2.0 Update 2 - Changed ETA calculation to base on current UTC time instead of ATD - Fixed NAV frequencies on MCDU Radio Page showing 0.0 after LOC tuned - Fixed Coupled VNAV not initiating descent - Limited range for PFD slip indicator - Limited range for PFD flight director - ETA calculation on MFD DATA FPLN Progress page - ETA calculation on MCDU PERF INIT page 3/3 - Improvements to GPWS mode 3 (altitude loss after takeoff) - Improvements to GPWS mode 5 (below glideslope) - Flaps/Slats EICAS animation corrected - Flaps/Slats exterior model animation corrected - A22 points
-
It's been a while since the last set of screenshots, so here's a few from the current build.20 points
-
Version 1.0.5.0 has been released. To get the fix, do the following: 1) If you bought your CRJ in the in-game (or in-sim) Marketplace, start MSFS, go to Profile -> Content Manager, click "Updates" on the left and select the CRJ from the list. Now click "Download". 2) If you bought your CRJ from an other store (including Aerosoft, Simmarket etc.), start the Aerosoft Updater from your start menu, select the CRJ from the Microsoft Flight Simulator branch and click "Update". 1.0.5.0 Update 5 - Reversed function of the volume knobs on the audio panels - Remo18 points
-
On my first flight with the -900, I flew from Trondheim-Vaernes to Alta. Very nice scenic route.17 points
-
The good news of the day is that we got some of the gauges to work. And they work with the new engine options of the sim and are pretty damned good. Better then P3D. Still some issue shown in the image, but we are getting there!17 points
-
The issue that was holding the CRJ update is solved. Being processed as fast as possible.15 points
-
13 points
-
May I politely ask on which planet some of you live? Do you seriously expect 24/7 support with instant hotfixing for a 42 euro product (the rest is VAT)? Support plans like this usually cost thousands of euros - every month. That said, nobody said that the issue wouldn't get fixed. You got that from not reading properly and drawing your own wrong conclusions. There will just not be a hotfix today. Firstly, because I haven't found the reason for the problem and therefore don't have a fix yet, and secondly, because Aerosoft is contractually obligated to provide Microsoft with a fix "11 points
-
From my side the planning is: tomorrow the big CRJ update after that the CRJ 900/1000 after that the Twin Otter (10 models!) after the A330.11 points
-
I personally really enjoy creating these small clutter objects, it does end up taking quite a bit of time though..10 points
-
The update has been confirmed to work correctly by several CRJ beta testers and @Andrea P. . It has now been shipped to Microsoft and now we wait... hopefully they can get this out fast. In the meantime, as a workaround, please assing THROTTLE 1 AXIS SET to your controller's throttle axis instead of THROTTLE AXIS SET. This will work for most. Best duplicate your controller profile and keep the original one as well. It will work again as soon as the update is installed.10 points
-
I have good news. ASOBO had a look at the crash dumps we sent in and those all point to the same problem. While I can't offer a solution or workaround at this time, I can at least tell you this: The problem is actively being worked on. The problem is not with the CRJ itself but somewhere with the code that loads the aircraft. I hope that a fix or at least a workaround will be available as soon as possible, however, this is out of my hands.9 points
-
The more I wait for this the more impatient I become 😂 not because I want it now, but because I'm genuinely so excited for the add-on -900/1000! The CRJ very quickly became my favourite MSFS aircraft after release and this is going to open up more opportunities for routes all over the world! Keep up the great work, I really can't wait to fly with it!9 points
-
I hope the CRJ 900/1000 yes.9 points
-
The issue has been identified and a fix is being tested. And yes, we did do some serious testing, 20 people, many weeks, but it simply never popped up and we are actually lucky Hans could recreate it.9 points
-
V1.0.2.0 Update 2 - Changed ETA calculation to base on current UTC time instead of ATD - Fixed NAV frequencies on MCDU Radio Page showing 0.0 after LOC tuned - Fixed Coupled VNAV not initiating descent - Limited range for PFD slip indicator - Limited range for PFD flight director - ETA calculation on MFD DATA FPLN Progress page - ETA calculation on MCDU PERF INIT page 3/3 - Improvements to GPWS mode 3 (altitude loss after takeoff) - Improvements to GPWS mode 5 (below glideslope) - Flaps/Slats EICAS animation corrected - Flaps/Slats exterior model animation corrected - A9 points
-
Well we do not like to toot our own horn but Alexander who is doing the flight model for the Twotter has been in rather close contact with our friends at Asobo....9 points
-
9 points
-
Please do not submit a “list” of bugs. There is a pinned post in the forum rules section specifically asking users not to do this. Nevertheless, I will answer some specifics. I cannot give you any information about how bindings with external hardware controllers do, or do not work (such as the altitude selector) - that would have to come from Hans. The CRJ requires Throttle (x) to work - not Throttle (x) 1-100. I use that same binding for the throttles in all default MSFS aircraft as well, and it works perfectly. I assume there is some advantage (to you, and perhaps oth8 points
-
MSFS is an evolving platform. Look where it has started last year in August, and where it is now. Microsoft and Asobo put tremendous efforts into improving and extending MSFS. Personally I have never seen anything even remotely comparable within the flight sim world. And I am in it for decades. And to be honest I have some problems in understanding people not seeing and not recognizing this. Things will come, for sure. But things also need time. I fully understand that with not having a software development background complex dependencies are hard to understand. Even more8 points
-
Let's say it will be available in the next 14 hours for everybody. Unless the sky falls down.8 points
-
The patch has been sent to Microsoft for inclusion in the MS Store, and the moment they make it available, it will be available to everyone. It is out of Aerosoft’s hands at this point - they have no control over how quickly the MS Store publishes the updated version of the CRJ.8 points
-
Still being looked at but the sky is a LOT brighter now!8 points
-
The American Eagle N550NN livery has been finished...8 points
-
They're prioritizing the A330, not abandoning the A320.8 points
-
by Fly Three Peak7 points
-
7 points
-
Did it load or display correctly before the 1.0.5 update? I would be surprised if it did. As I have explained before in other threads, neither the real nor simulated CRJ is compatible with any RNP/AR approach procedure using curved RF leg segments. This includes the RNP 19 approach at KDCA, both RNP approaches at KPSP, the RNP procedures at VQPR (Paro, Bhutan), and many many more. I mention these in particular, because it seems many CRJ customers are trying to load and fly these procedures and running into problems, which is to be expected. If you set KDCA as a destinat7 points
-
An issue was identified on the latest release, and the Aerosoft team: - Was fully transparent and confirmed the issue - Got the community involved to diagnose - Was completely honest about testing strategy, how an unfortunate lack of single axis beta testers led to it being missed (which I'm sure is being discussed internally?) - Pulled a fix together and shipped to MS as soon as was possible - Available in ASUpdater today, only a couple of days after it was first found. Bravo team... in an otherwise turbulent community that is Flight Simulation, you7 points
-
OK. I found the reason why my Visual Studio wouldn't compile. I'm now going to stop posting here and dig into the problem instead 🙂 I'll let you all know as soon as I have a solution.7 points
-
No offense taken. I am now making a personal comment. I manage the support department. In that capacity people like Marius fall under my responsibility (I share that with sales). And every day I see mails and posts (those are removed of course) that are seriously violent. A few hours ago a British customer called me (and a support officer) a Nazi because we shipped a product to him and the UK state asked him to pay import taxes and handling fees. Money we do not get a single penny from. As I was pissed off about being called a Nazi (I am politically on the left side7 points
-
7 points
-
6 points
-
I read the entire message in the Updater. It doesn't say anywhere about having to do a full install. It just says a "New Installer Is Available For This Product." No need to be an ass about it.6 points
-
What more replies than the ones already given here in this topic do you need?6 points
-
Very good. Thank you! You should be able to use the single axis setting with only THROTTLE 1 AXIS. If that works too, then we at least have a workaround. I will start looking for what causes the issue, so I can provide a fix asap. @Floki Could you try this as well? Duplicate your current throttle profile and change THROTTLE AXIS to THROTTLE 1 AXIS.6 points
-
sim-wings next Canaries Airport: Tenerife-Sur Features: Highly detailed Tenerife Sur Airport scenery Terraforming to blend airport into default elevation model Runway with real elevation profile (sloped) and on a lower level then the Apron of the airport Custom aerial photo for the airport, elaborate retouching and color-correction for a true display Intensive use of PBR Materials to build realistic surface for all Buildings and Objects Detailed ground markings based on recent charts of parking stands and new taxiway layouts (Airac 2103). Inclu6 points
-
All of the images shown until now display the CRJ900 only. The CRJ1000 is currently under production. While both look pretty similar from distance and you could mean the longer fuse is the only difference between them, in truth the CRJ1000 has more wing depth, more wingspan, different winglets and also the whole belly section is a different construction. So this takes some time to finish. When we are ready, we will post pictures as usual here....6 points
-
New Version has been send to the BETA Team for testing.5 points
-
All, If you look back at the beginning of this thread, you will see that I was one of the earlier posters. I mention this because at that time, the CTD’s that were being reported were consistent in that they wouldn’t allow MSFS to either get to the start screen, or if you managed to get that far, then the CTD would occur when you tried to choose the CRJ in the hanger, or if you were lucky and got that far, then the CTD occurred when you entered the World Map screen. This was always my case and I was never even able to fly the CRJ. Everyone else was reporting the exact same scenarios.5 points
-
I have found the solution, and culprit of the issue. I use Addonlinker for my addons, and for some reason "fsuipc-lvar-bridge" was disabled. That makes the CRJ unusuable if you load it in with the FSUIPC exe file running in the background. The advice to "remove everything from the community folder" sent my problemsolving in the wrong direction unfortunately. Of course no ill will was behind the advice. The solution is to have the fsuipc lvar bridge module active in the community folder. @JRBarrett perhaps you could, just for the sake of science, doublecheck my findings5 points
-
Version 1.0.0
409 downloads
This will only work for the AEROSOFT STORE VERSION of the plane. This will only work for the CRJ700 DEFAULT LIVERIES. INSTALL: Place unzipped " CRJ-textures-mod " folder into your Community folder. Install optional windows mod for dirty windows (the best windows) Default is clean. This is a completely repainted cockpit model using Substance Painter. Real life images were used as references. All images are 4K and the highest quality possible in the sim. This mod was APPROVED by Aerosoft for exclusive upload on this forum only. If I5 points -
DxDiag.txt5 points
-
The developer only got early access to SU4 at the same time as the other Asobo beta testers did, which was about 10 days ago, and Asobo was still making internal changes to SU4 as late as last Friday based on feedback from the beta program. Aerosoft could not have submitted the update for approval “weeks” ago in any case. The update was still in active development and testing until very late last week. The extra development time allowed several additional features to be added, including a substantial improvement in the way that flaps and slats work, both visually and aerodynamically.5 points
-
Update: For those who use the Navigraph AIRAC database in the CRJ, the problem with multiple approach transitions having the same name has been solved, and the fix will be included in the next AIRAC update (cycle 2105) which should be available from Navigraph on May 21st5 points
-
Super nice video:5 points
-
Czech Airlines Technics Hangar with 3D Interior5 points
