Leaderboard

Finnair, they have made it clear they wont allready, you have allready made this stern demand in the project airbus forum very sternly, these are all people who work very hard just to make a model for you, and you join up not to compliment the work but to almost order them to do it, it very hard to at wingflex to an already made model like this, you would know this if you had ever modeled a plane but, no. I apologise if i am being rude to you but they are working very hard and well, there isnt much more to it. -tom

Honestly, the wingspan on the 320 is not long enough to notice any flex. We surely can't see it from the flight deck. You would have to be standing in front of the wing to be able to catch it and this product is focused on PF workload not plane spotting. Regards D

Can you give me the source for this statement? So, you own all addon aircrafts for FSX? Or can you at least name them?

..and I noticed that the wheels stay round when it's on the ground too, that's really terrible. I want to be able to deflate my tires when I land on a soft runway or loose sand. I bet you can't flush the toilets either, what kind of airliner is this? And why doesn't the stewardess come by with complimentary drinks when I'm in cabin view? How does anyone expect me to buy this? Seriously, the wingflex thing has been discussed at length earlier, and if that is the dealbreaker for you......sad, really, being scared of a bus (what kind of name is that anyway?)

It is aerosoft's decision, what we say has a certain impact on the project in the early stages, but now it is too late to change this even if they were goin to, so please dont take it out anyone else here, i have asked this question before and gotten a very reasonable answer, that the aircraft is primarily for its virtual cockpit and thats it, they cant change one product for one persons opinion, i bet everone in this thread wants wing flex but weve accepted it aint happening.:/ and thats fine, because it is still a great product and if you look through this WIP and the videos on youtube, it is well worth the money, and i belive others would agree with this

Calm down. Who said you HAVE to buy it? Who said you are doing us a favor? Sometimes I think I'm loosing my time with little kids tantrums... P.S: If you think you got nowhere in FSX, just go back to FS9. I think it's that simple. Many people still use it.

Look, you aren't the only one who wants these features, but at one point or another the aerosoft team have made it quite clear of the features of these planes, which is primarily the vc functions, now ill admit im upset they won't do stuff like the a319 or use it in fs9 too and the wing flex, cos if you turn your mind to the rest of the stuff they've done in this project and the mega airports etc, they done some pretty amazing work and is one of the most well known scenery / aircraft providers in the fs community, and no this is true... movieman162.........I'm sorry, but if you honestly think that Aerosoft can be bullied into adding useless features by writing angry posts in all caps, you are clearly delusional. They have millions of people around the world who will buy this and i dont think your purchase makes all the difference so if you like it buy it, if you dont, dont buy it and leave aerosoft alone With respect---tom

Either that or he's a troll.

So, the lack a small vertical deviation in the wings is going to be a deal breaker for you? If you're only interested in watching the aircraft, I'm sure there are numerous videos on the web. Airbus X is for people that want to fly the A320/1. Chris

Mathijs is busy at the moment and asked me to post some pictures of the up and coming Paris Orly airport. NB: AI Traffic not included.

well, this is it, hope u like it, its taken me two years please comment!

Just a nice rendering of the F-16 we released last year. We needed this image for promotional purposes and it's so nice we thought, why not show you. It also shows what kind of data is actually in the files we make, you see FSX does not do it fully justice.

While I am waiting for my home airport -Barcelona- to be launched, I am doing my flights from/to Madrid Barajas... That's another wonderful airport I am enjoying a lot. Thanks Simwings and Aerosoft!

I find it very amazing that someone who can't find how to unlock the cap key on his keyboard is so focused on a technical point of view...

Did I push your button? I do not work for Aerosoft but I am associated with Airbus X. Wing flex means something to some people and not to others. For this project a few inches of wing flex wasn't considered. That was Aerosoft's decision. Given the large market I doubt this will have any noticeable impact on sales. Chris

I'm sorry, but if you honestly think that Aerosoft can be bullied into adding useless features by writing angry posts in all caps, you are clearly delusional.

Th yellow hooks on the wings is for emergency liferifts when landing in water, so the rifts dont float away from the aircraft, all aircraft much be fit with emergency exit over the wing's, aircraft's mushed be fitt with minuim of 3 emergency exit 1 front and rear 1 over the wings colin

Great job man! But it looks damn dangerous to land on that helipad with that wire above it!

it will not be released WITH a Cyprus livery, but it will be available after the release:

Can't give times yet. Have some problems with the coastlines that display every single ice field from the satellite images but I'm close to getting it solved. Certainly a few more weeks to go until beta. Bests, Sascha

Very very great news Mathijs Can't wait ! Thanks Best Regards

FSX default screenshot capture from my flight LDZA - LDDU

Great new for the FS9 version!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! One remark for the pictures, we can see the "DELTA MUSEUM" à the south of Orly, we can see a Concorde prototype and two Caravelle. In the reallity there is one Concorde prototype, only one Caravelle and one Mercure in Air Inter texture. I know when i lived in Paris i visited it many times. Thanks for this beautiful pictures.

For all you FSX Naval Aviator enthusiasts, Just released FREEWARE: Dino's T-45C Goshawk version 1.85 & Javier Fernandez's Nimitz and Eisenhower nuclear carriers. Click Here for UPDATE: AI & USS Carrier Missing Sounds Fix. Enjoy!

Lockheed Martin continues to develope FSX... With ACES studio members http://www.prepar3d.com/experience/Experience.aspx

PMDG American Connection BAe Jetstream 4100 over NYC.

Well, last time I checked, the working title of this project was Aerosoft Flight Simulator 2013, not Aerosoft Cabin Simulator 2013. While ethnically diverse passengers that independently move about the cabin sounds like quite complex a problem (and would justify a simulation in its own right), not to mention the performance overhead, it contributes nothing at all to the experience of flight. Now if you'd been talking about the shifting center of gravity caused by wandering passengers... When I check out a new aircraft add-on and notice a nicely modeled virtual cabin, I think to myself, how cute. But after that single moment, I spend exactly 0% of the time in the cabin - just like real pilots tend to stay in the cockpit. In fact, real simulators don't even have cabins... Judith

Hello, My try, PMDG MD11 LTU departing 06 at Ibiza

Thank you, Mr. Fletcher! I will try your suggestions; any reason "why" you can no longer use the "C:\Program Files (x86)\" folder? Also, others have suggested I install FSX in it own folder and their products in their own folders, too. Can I just create a Flight Sim Folder and put everything in there? Thanks again! BTW: Is there any news on Ms. Nicole S. status?

Mr. Sascha "Sasa," Glad she's finally getting your "special treatment!"

So Aerosoft, Football is over know you can restart to develop nice scenerys!

Me too! Still 0-0 for now, though. And it's pity Munich is being delayed all the time. It seems like a nice stop between EHAM and the "countries of the east". East-Europe, that is.

Hi, ich habe mich schon längere Zeit nicht mehr zum Thema geäussert. Aber nun muss ich halt mein Senftübchen wieder mal ausdrücken. Ich finde die endlosen Diskussionen ehrlich leid. Was bringts denn? Ist der Release denn dann früher? Manche User, so scheint es mir, haben das ganze Jahr die "wollen-haben-Wochen", ohne darüber nachzudenken, welche imense Arbeiten in so einem Projekt stecken. Thomas gibt mit Sicherheit sein möglichstest. Aber er hat auch noch andere Arbeiten die gemacht werden müssen. Und ich bin mir sicher, er verfolgt diesen Thread auch, und ist mit der Situation ebenso wenig zufrieden wie der Rest hier. Aber wie bei allen Projekten (egal in welcher Branche) tauchen oft unvorhersehbare Porbleme auf. Und das verzögert eben die Fertigstellung. Keinem hilft es somit, das man hier ellenlange und teilweise sowas von Sinnlose postings schreibt. Wenn es denn irgendwie förderlich wäre dann könnte ich es noch nachvollziehen. Kritik sollte berechtigt sein. Aber sie sollte konstruktiv sein. Wem das ganze zu lange dauert, der soll sich doch selber an die Arbeit machen. Mit dem ADE und dem SDK hat man schon mal eine gute Basis. Wer sich intensiver mit der Materie befasst wird sehr schnell feststellen, wieviel (Frei)zeit man damit verbraten kann. Wer nur z.B. auf einem Standard-Airport mittels ADE die Parkpositionen für den AI-Traffic korrigieren möchte, der sitzt schon schnell mal ne Stunde. Vielleicht lebt dann der eine oder andere nicht mehr in den"wollen-haben-Wochen" sondern begnügt sich dann mit " lieber-wollen-warten-Wochen" Wer das Talent zum designen hat, dem bietet AS mit Sicherheit seine Plattform für den Vertrieb an. (Wenn es denn so gut ist, das man dafür ein paar €uros verlangen kann) Und wer seine Sachen anderen für lau zur Verfügung stellen will, der findet bei AVSIM oder Flightsim auch einen Partner. Andererseits verstehe ich aber diese Release-Datum-Politik nicht. Warum macht man das? Erst dadurch erzeugt man solche Diskussionen. Lasst das Releasedatum einfach weg, wenn ihr euch nicht 100% sicher seit, das ihr diesen Termin auch einhalten könnt. Dafür immer wieder mal ein paar 3-Zeiler der Entwickler zum Stand der Dinge und ein paar neue Bilder, und ich bin mir sicher, das weit über 90% der User glücklicher sind als derzeit. Die Unverbesserlichen und die ewigen Nörgler gibt es immer. Denen kann man es sowieso nie recht machen. Das ist meine Meinung zum Thema Gruß Gerd

Moin Oliver, hier prallen wiedermal die beiden Fronten aufeinander. Und BEIDE ! sind auch verständlich. Um es den User möglichst detailgetreu anzubieten, sind immer neuere Dinge zu beachten, zu designen und funktionierend einzubinden. Das ist der Wunsch der Nutzer und erfordert immer mehr Zeit! Das sollten wir auch verstehen und respektieren. Hinzu kommen dann überrachende Ereignisse, die das geplante Ziel durcheinander würfeln, sei's Krankheit, Geburten oder anderer hemmender Dinge. Nur sollten diese Schwierigkeiten dann auch kommuniziert werden. Es ist schön von Dir Oliver, das Du uns das gefühl gibst, dass die Szenerie weitergebaut wird. Sollte das aber nicht jemand aus dem Entwicklerteam machen, der die geanauen Gründe kennt? Ein oder Zwei Zeilen sind da schon genug, und die User sind auch Menschen und verstehen die unvorhersehbaren Dinge auch. Wir sehen schöne Bilder monatelang und können nicht verstehen, wo die Sache hakelt. Dann kommen solche Emotionen wie hier hoch ( und hier geht es noch zu diesem Themagemäßigt zu!!). 1 oder 2 Sätze können Ruhe reinbringen, dass sollte sich die Geschäftsleitung mal überlegen. Und ( ich habe lange gerungen, ob ich folgendes schreiben soll oder nicht, um nicht die Sache weiter anzuheizen) ich möchte nur mal ein Blick auf die letzetn Monate zurück werfen. Was sich da für ein Bild aufbaut, das möchte ich aus sicht einesd analytischen mensches gern mit der GF klären. Daher können Günter oder Andreas gern Kontakt aufnehmen, sozusagen von Unternehmer zu Unternehmer. Halten wir es wie die deutsche Elf, gemeinsam sind wir ein Team - User, Designer und AS- und nicht Einzelkämpfer! Meine persönliche Meinung! Schönen Morgen noch wünscht Andreas

Chris, es reicht. Wenn Du so abgenervt bis, das Deine Wunschvorstellungen nicht alle "Sofort" umgesetzt werden und alle Entwickler DEINE Vorlieben nicht nur SOFORT anfangen und gefälligst auch schnell fertig sind, dann denke doch mal darüber nach, selbst mal etwas kreativ zu werden. In der Zeit, die Du hier diese überflüssigen Post machst, hast Du schon den SDK auswendig gelernt, ein erster Schritt, damit es wieder einen mehr gibt, der Deine Wünsche erfüllen kann. Es wird an MUC gearbeitet, täglich. Das es leider nicht so FLOTT vorangeht, liegt auch an der Entscheidung, die Wünsche der Kunden hier nach realistischen Unterführungen umzusetzen, was nun andere Zusatzlösungen bedarf und da es sich nicht um eine "Default-Library-Objekt-Placer-Scenery" handelt, entseht alles halt nicht von alleine. Das die Releasedatumsschieberei nervt ist verständlich, die nervt auch die Entwickler, den statt "to be announced" hinzuschreiben, immer ein Datum zu nennen, was von niemandem zugesichert werden kann, ist unverständlich. Aber was hilft es, Aufregen bringt keine Sekunde mehr Zeit zum Arbeiten.

Well just leave it as it is then. You can wait for the advnaced version; so you are all set? No point in complainung anymore what has been discussed previsouly. And I am a basic simmer and I dont really want to fly the defualt bus thank-you:) Thats whay this is product is for me....now can we all talk about something else? World Cup, What great flights we have done; geez louise!! lol Simon

Emphasizing pilot duties is a lot different than modeling *only* pilot duties. Read the thread's 1st post. The outside-the-aircraft features you so casually dismiss are important to a lot of the audience. *** This gets lost in all the SIDS/STARS stuff: No Aerosoft A32X pilot *has to* program a single waypoint into the MCDU. Default flight-plans are the main idea. Or don't even bother w/ that if you don't want.... Yet if you *want* to add the SID/STAR waypoints, you can do that. The functionality to do that (manually) is there; and it was only later added to the feature list. Added several months in, not so many ago. And it was a significant undertaking. Read the older forums. So is there any way to see this *at all* in a more positive light? I understand that to keep hearing an answer you don't like must be frustrating. (It must frustrate others to keep reading the same comments too, given your mark-downs.) But this SID/STAR thing has been beaten to death. Really. Is it *that* big of a deal, given the realities that have been mentioned? (That the route / procedures are often programmed manually, and that they're frequently abandoned because of ATC and the inherently dynamic flight environments?) How often do you think an Airbus touches down at the time its loaded flightplan says it will? So let's stop acting as if MCDU SID's/STAR's capabilities were the aircraft's main automation advances, some fundamental-to-flying feature you're being denied. No, the main automation advances were the protections, flight control laws, limits, etc... (Just TRY to stall it. Good luck!) But we are all still *piloting* an aircraft after all, right? Not just managing, as if it's a Windows7 upgrade. Many, many pilots feel strongly about automation over-dependence, and yes, even some Airbus pilots who use a lot of it. (I live w/in 15 miles of AOPA HQ. Highly varied crowd over there.) The sentiment is that if a pilot is *that* dependent upon strict procedure, it's a little dangerous, because the ability to adapt may become rusty. Thankfully, in reality, it's not all as strictly adhered to as some in these forums may say. Consider... if you've got an Airbus waiting in line 20 miles from KDCA, with some Boeings up there too, does the controller give the Airbus priority just because it's more automated and has flightplan procedures, fuel-economy, etc., strictly punched in? No way. They must all ultimately *fly*. Please, just remember... you the customer may *still choose* to fly the aircraft as strictly or as loosely as you want. A wide range of people will be pleased. No, not everyone. But perhaps a little perspective is in order with this SID/STAR issue?

It sounds like to me that they will have an abundance of 'left seat' stuff to enter and to simulate the airbus systems as for the target audience intended. I think the level of detail will be a lot for me to take in as a novice to this anyhow. So I think it is a great idea to keep the bus simple with a possible future update or upgrade to a more advanced one if they go that route. I just don't have the time to learn a ton of new stuff right now. I want a framerate friendly flyable bus that will allow me to look out the window and see that amazing FSX world out there while studying for my next exam (s)

C'mon... Mathijs has already said (on numerous occasions) that they're thinking of upgrading the systems at a later date. Let them finish what they originally planned to do and if we behave, maybe they will reward us with an advanced version. Dave

UPDATE: Click Here for UPDATE: AI & USS Carrier Missing Sounds Fix.

Thank you Mr. mk83!

Yes, I completely agree, FSX is coming into its own this year ... and, nice screenshots! PS: Is that FLIR Visor available for download yet or is it still in BETA testing?

Your Very Welcome, Sir; Enjoy!

Thank you for the information, I just installed and is a true wonder

whats the latest with the release date? i know it has been delayed significantly. with the delay, is there also any update on the more advanced systems version matias?

Yes that's it! I don't Know where a Pilot how is approaching at Frankfurt will have the time to insert all STAR or transition waypoints by hand into MCDU. I am talking about online flying and there are many users how want to fly this bird online! So the easyest way to stop the SID/STAR questions is, just to add this function in the bus!

Yes that's it! I don't Know where a Pilot how is approaching at Frankfurt will have the time to insert all STAR or transition waypoints by hand into MCDU. I am talking about online flying and there are many users how want to fly this bird online! So the easyest way to stop the SID/STAR questions is, just to add this function in the bus!

Sorry, you statement has nothing to do with the scenery, as long as your AI-Traffic will have the airport as a destination, it could handle it. Please don't start any discussion related to this here, this is not a support thread of a unreleased product.

Good afternoon, we will be able to buy this Airbus at Aerosoft French , main page because ,we don't have this airbus in pre-order pre-order aerosoft French thanks for help Jules //French Division