Professional Flight Planner X
Support und Diskussionen fur PFPX - Professional Flight Planner X
447 topics in this forum
-
- 2 replies
- 539 views
-
- 2 replies
- 472 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1483 views
-
- 9 replies
- 751 views
-
- 3 replies
- 574 views
-
- 5 replies
- 1100 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1005 views
-
- 6 replies
- 592 views
-
- 1 reply
- 503 views
-
- 3 replies
- 626 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1505 views
-
- 6 replies
- 618 views
-
- 5 replies
- 741 views
-
- 1 reply
- 469 views
-
- 1 reply
- 523 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1157 views
-
- 6 replies
- 464 views
-
- 6 replies
- 576 views
-
- 7 replies
- 675 views
-
- 1 reply
- 583 views
-
- 1 reply
- 527 views
-
- 8 replies
- 1000 views
-
- 2 replies
- 430 views
-
- 6 replies
- 878 views
-
- 4 replies
- 643 views
-
Posts
-
By Mathijs Kok · Posted
Because we believe this topic has been answered we have closed it. If you have any more questions feel free to open a new topic. -
By Mathijs Kok · Posted
This is the only way to keep the FPS as high as it is and we do not plan any changes. Sorry. We do not see this as a major flaw but certainly as a limitation. We do see these issues with some users as you mention, but we find it hard to actually replicate this on out systems because we do not often seen these massive drops in fps. P3D is very capable of handing over these tasks to other cores. We can only replicate this reliable when we do manual tweaks to the cfg files. -
By Mathijs Kok · Posted
Because we believe this topic has been answered we have closed it. If you have any more questions feel free to open a new topic. -
By Mathijs Kok · Posted
Because we believe this topic has been answered we have closed it. If you have any more questions feel free to open a new topic. -
By Mathijs Kok · Posted
Well we need a bit more information, exactly what is happening that should not happen?
-