Professional Flight Planner X
Support und Diskussionen fur PFPX - Professional Flight Planner X
449 topics in this forum
-
Pinned topics
-
- 22 replies
- 7619 views
-
- 1 reply
- 3833 views
-
- 0 replies
- 3633 views
-
- 0 replies
- 2993 views
-
Topics
-
- 64 replies
- 6543 views
-
- 40 replies
- 15179 views
-
- 38 replies
- 2507 views
-
- 26 replies
- 5404 views
-
- 25 replies
- 2448 views
-
- 24 replies
- 1824 views
-
- 22 replies
- 1855 views
-
- 22 replies
- 1079 views
-
- 21 replies
- 2039 views
-
- 20 replies
- 1810 views
-
- 19 replies
- 4971 views
-
- 17 replies
- 2553 views
-
- 17 replies
- 995 views
-
- 16 replies
- 4503 views
-
- 16 replies
- 1961 views
-
- 15 replies
- 1133 views
-
- 15 replies
- 1605 views
-
- 15 replies
- 974 views
-
- 14 replies
- 734 views
-
- 14 replies
- 1444 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1549 views
-
Posts
-
-
-
By Heinz Flichtbeil · Posted
I think, that all is more a problem from the developement of Bergen from XP10 to XP11 and all the updates X-Plane 11 has done in the meantime. We don't shall discuss it here too long. The developer knows about it (I have send the informations to him).... And I think he can fix it .... Greets Heinz -
The aprons can basically defined through custom ground for the physics but not for the map - this depends on the method used and in both cases you get definded taxiways and aprons but they don't show up on the map if you use the custom ground to do this and no additional underlaying taxiways. -
So please contact Aerosoft directly with a proof of your purchase: https://helpdesk.aerosoft.com/portal/home
-