Don't know if is again server maintenance.

Tks.

As you can see here, this shows a FIR change in an adequate airport and after that in TOSET Fix, TOSET and SCCH are both in SCEZ FIR and not in SAMF FIR, i dont know what to do to fix this

Do you have the same issue?

No opinions from other users, I just want a reply from someone in the company that really knows please. Thanks.

But for purely aesthetic reasons, I'd like to remove the asterisk from *CLB and *DES on the OFP. Is that possible? Just curious.

If you want them to be included in the next PFPX release, send them to support@flightsimsoft.com, please!

On 10/15/2021 at 2:21 PM, WarDog669 said:

Simbrief is limited to what aircraft you can plan for, while PFPX gives you the option to make your own aircraft profile, in my case I have a profiles for IL76s, AN124 and AN225

 

about the "navigraph integration" if you use navigraph you can download AIRACs for PFPX as well as Simbrief.

But they haven't been seen on here since.
So does anyone else maybe have a performance file for the AN225?
I do know simbrief has one but it can't be downloaded and I am not a huge fan of using simbrief.

Quote

(FPL-THY2323-IN
-A320/M-SDE2E3FGHIJ1RWXYZ/HB1
-EGSS1705
-N0482F310 CLN M84 KONAN UL607 REMBA DCT LIRSU DCT NONKO DCT
 VIBOM DCT NOMBO DCT RIDAR DCT RADIZ DCT NEMEK DCT SOLGU DCT
 OSLUD DCT MEDUX UM867 KOGAT DCT DISOR UL608 FSK UN128 LMO UN127
 RIKSO
-LTBJ0257
-PBN/A1B1C1D1O1S2 NAV/RNP2 DAT/V DOF/230110 REG/GEZUS SEL/EPHK
 CODE/40666C ORGN/EDDFEZYX PER/C)

I've been looking at this thread here which has been very helpful but for the DCT segments and the PROF205 ones, I just don't understand what's going on with it - 

Thanks

Is this snippet published somewhere? It would seem like a pre-determined route segment, since it shows up frequently, but it's not part of the only published departure (OHARE7, which is just vectors) as far as I can see. And the dogleg to PETTY (to the northeast) seems like a needless extension of the route, which is why I'm wondering about this. For example, the route to KSFO was:

RAYNR DCT BRTMN DCT TAAYZ DCT PETTY DCT BAE ... , so we were actually backtracking a bit. To VHHH it was:

RAYNR DCT BRTMN DCT TAAYZ DCT PETTY DCT GRB ... , which isn't a backtrack but isn't as direct as (for example) TAAYZ DCT GRB.

I could assume that it's a preferred route segment for the purposes of traffic flow, but is this published anywhere? And where would the data be stored within PFPX?

Just curious, thanks.

We are writing to you concerning problems with PFPX route creating function.

When we try to build a route from UMMS to UMMG, it completely refuses to use SID via OSMUS from UMMS and sends us direct to point PEPAR. 

The same occurs with the reversal route. Only PEPAR is used as SID from UMMG while using KOMEN and then REWED and ORHIM to KIZIR is correct.

After point PEPAR there's OSMUS and only then KIZIR but OSMUS is a SID fix - it can't be used upon arrival.

Another issue concerns altitudes. When we fly from UMMS to UMII, UMIO, UMGG, UMOO - cruising altitude (not level) is 5000 ft. Normally it should be at least FL170. Flights to UMMS have normal flight level. We found the solution in selecting "No step climb" and "Max altitude". Could you confirm that we are doing everything as it should be done?

Finally, is it possible to have speed in FPL in knots, not kilometers per hour? Can it somehow depend on the FIR?

Standing by for your pieces of advice.

Alex.

The approach is going to be GCLP ILS Z Rwy 03L, which involves a 12 mile leg from LALTO to intercept the 10 DME arc from LPC to the final approach course.

My question has to do with fuel planning for the approach. The stretch from the origin (OERR) via RUSIK1K to LALTO is fine, but PFPX plans a direct leg from LALTO to the airport, whereas the approach takes a non-direct route because of the DME arc. This increases the fuel burn, especially if ATC ends up asking for the arc to be flown at a constant altitude. 

Therefore, what is the typical and preferred way to account for extra fuel burn in the approach itself? Would you add this to contingency? Or to "Approach Time" on the Aircraft editor? Or somewhere else?

Thanks.

My tracks and weather are still not updating. Any ideas?

Thanks

WX and Tracks aren't updating upon opening PFPX this morning. Had to resort to SimBrief. Is there an outage?

Thanks

-Rick

Since a few days the WX and Tracks are constantly updating. They get the green "checkmark" with "Online" beside both of them for a few seconds, and then they turn orange with "Updating" beside them.

The Wind data is valid for today with todays date, and the validity is from 25 Dec 00:00z - 27 Dec 00:00z.

Has anyone experienced the same, or know what is causing it?

Cheers,

Orjan.

I tried to make my own Lion Air OFP format but the navigation log is really a mess.
 

I have OFP format and fuel policy for WizzAir, Lion Air, Citilink, Cebu Pacific, Batik Air, Sriwijaya, NAM Air, PIA and Nok Air.

Message me on discord if youre interested in helping

bruhh#1864

Is there a way to insert the value of the EGW at every waypoint? I didn't find this specific field in the manual.

Thanks!

Mircea

For over a year I have been making profiles for Professional Flight Planner X (PFPX).

I use precise performance fata from manuals. I am glad to help pilots in improving precision of flying in FS.

For now, there are several Boeing families available here.

Planned aircraft families:

- Boeing 757-200 Family;

- Embraer E-Jets;

– Airbus A319/320/321 Family.

This topic is for discussion. Feel free to write a feedback, a review, a request or a proposition.

You may also mail me via flyprecisely(at)hotmail.com

Pages on Facebook:

Info page: https://www.facebook.com/FlyPrecisely

Discussion page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1447959668806429/