Professional Flight Planner X (not for sale anymore)
All your comments and support for PFPX
4321 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 815 views
-
- 62 replies
- 6.6k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.1k views
-
- 4 replies
- 3.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 836 views
-
- 2 replies
- 829 views
-
- 6 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 734 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.3k views
-
- 6 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 782 views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 984 views
-
- 1 reply
- 925 views
-
- 0 replies
- 679 views
-
- 0 replies
- 581 views
-
- 2 replies
- 933 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 929 views
-
- 22 replies
- 4.8k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.5k views
Announcements
-
Popular Topics
-
-
Latest Posts
-
Hallo Michael, das sind noch alte Kacheln aus XP11 mit Ortho4XP 1.30. Ich warte noch auf XP12.10 und das neue Ortho4XP von OscarPilot. Liebe Grüße, Bernd -
That may be true, even though there are plenty of renditions of Stuttgart already available. It would be better to do Hannover instead, there is no good rendition available at the moment in my opinion. Sorry for the offtopic.
-
Hol dir mal die Höhendaten von Sonny, hier N47E008.hgt https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Y6EOUVX3RqTlwa5qDDjVLnSGxlHBZj1Z und speichere die .hgt in den Ordner ".../Elevation_data/+40+000/", den du vielleicht anlegen musst. Dann die Kachel neu erzeugen, Ortho4XP benutzt dafür die Höhendaten aus der Sonny.-.hgt
-
You mean, the XP11 version runs faster? That's weird because they should be the same basically aside from some XP12 related optimizations... seems I need to check for myself with the actual product but this will happen monday at best. Meanwhile you could try the XP11 version in XP12 and see how that works in terms of performance. -
-
![Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account]](https://forum.aerosoft.com/uploads/monthly_2023_09/Aerosoft_Social_Media_Profilbild_Neu23.thumb.jpg.03721825e6a434ed4af0c8b2b73a5898.jpg)
