General hardware (No specific - or mixed - simulator/addon)
We all know that getting the right combination of hardware and software for your complex simulations is not easy. Feel free to ask advice here or to share your experiences.
914 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 714 views
-
Honeycomb App for other Simulations than FSX / P3D / MSFS and X-Plane (especially the Aerowinx PSX)?
- 4 replies
- 616 views
-
- 1 reply
- 365 views
-
- 0 replies
- 448 views
-
- 3 replies
- 611 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 455 views
-
- 4 replies
- 651 views
-
- 5 replies
- 730 views
-
- 12 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 0 replies
- 429 views
-
- 6 replies
- 559 views
-
- 7 replies
- 4.3k views
-
- 1 reply
- 536 views
-
- 4 replies
- 699 views
-
- 8 replies
- 667 views
-
- 0 replies
- 521 views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 469 views
-
- 3 replies
- 916 views
-
- 0 replies
- 415 views
-
- 1 reply
- 453 views
-
- 2 replies
- 490 views
![Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account]](https://forum.aerosoft.com/uploads/monthly_2023_09/Aerosoft_Social_Media_Profilbild_Neu23.thumb.jpg.03721825e6a434ed4af0c8b2b73a5898.jpg)
Announcements
-
Popular Topics
-
-
Latest Posts
-
Hi, after you've set your new settings make sure you delete the "aerosoft-airport-engm-oslo.dat" file in the SceneryIndexes folder, as the change in settings don't take effect before that's done. You can use the included batch file to do so.Please login to display this image.
-
By avduarri01 · Posted
Hi, In the configurator I'm selecting "Passenger density medium" and "traffic Medium" but it is not saving the selection. In Sim, there is no passengers, no traffic. I go back to the Configurator and the selection is not saved. I tried several times to no avail. Am I doing something wrong? Thank you -
Okay... if Manchester works that much better, then I guess there might be an issue with the scenery but I don't have it right know so this has to wait until tomorrow to see if there actually is an issue. Judging by the screenshots it should not be much worse than Manchester, but the modelling at Bergamo is more detailed and it's a newer scenery so it can be more fps heavy for good reasons. Also have in mind that at Manchester there is only the city northern to the airport while Bergamo there is autogen all around the airport and this might also contribute to worse performance (similar to Manchester when approaching from the south looking at the city). -
What are you doing inside a terminal-building anyways? 😅 -
The answer you are looking for is obvious if you look at how Aerosoft has interacted with customers during every aircraft release for MSFS up to this point. And beyond the initial release...their support and maintenance of the product is also just...bad. From the outside, it seems like their model and structure for development is inherently flawed.
-
