MS FS - ITALIAN DISCUSSION AND SUPPORT
Il forum per tutti i nostri amici di lingua italiana, ospitato da Augusto Morosini
281 topics in this forum
-
Pinned topics
-
- 14 replies
- 16927 views
-
- 5 replies
- 14351 views
-
- 5 replies
- 9531 views
-
- 0 replies
- 8604 views
-
Topics
-
- 58 replies
- 8047 views
-
- 30 replies
- 7108 views
-
- 22 replies
- 2939 views
-
- 16 replies
- 8859 views
-
- 16 replies
- 2838 views
-
- 15 replies
- 2326 views
-
- 13 replies
- 3237 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1855 views
-
- 13 replies
- 9772 views
-
- 12 replies
- 3045 views
-
- 12 replies
- 2682 views
-
- 12 replies
- 5531 views
-
- 12 replies
- 2822 views
-
- 11 replies
- 5703 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1762 views
-
- 10 replies
- 4044 views
-
- 9 replies
- 2932 views
-
- 9 replies
- 2354 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1883 views
-
- 9 replies
- 3397 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1992 views
-
Posts
-
Would love to see the -60 variant with slightly more modern equipment. -
By fernandito1969 · Posted
To Mr. Herman; My bad Sir on the text box above "EGHH" that was a typo, I mean to type EGLL as you pointed out. Already revise and ensure that it was correct. Thanks. -
Hi, I'm currently flying VHHH-EGLL (attached). I have questions about two issues: In the FP the initial altitude is FL302 (Metric RVSM in China). However, in my aircraft with all these weights and such, PMDG offers me an easy FL322. So how can I get PFPX to offer me FL322 as well? Is it my aircraft performance profile? I'm using the one provided on Airliner Performance.net. Also, Active Sky is my weather engine in the sim and for PFPX. As you can see in the FP the altitude changes dramatically. Why can't I get a normal step climb profile? I have RAD 1902 installed from the downloads section. I know this is a recurring issue from more people but I didn't find an answer to my situation in those treads. Thanks in advanced. BAW32 VHHH-EGLL (18-Feb-2019) #1.pdf
-
@Carsten74 Mit der 11.32b1 habe ich in einem bestimmten Gebiet in Japan regelmäßig Crashes. Diese Betaversion hast du, laut deinem Logfile, ebenfalls im Einsatz. Da ich die Betaversion von 124thATC teste, dachte ich, dass diese Version für die Abstürtze verantwortlich sei, ohne dieses Plugin gibt es die Abstürtze aber auch. Ich vermute jetzt, dass die 11.32b1 etwas wackelig ist. Ich teste weiter und hoffe auf ein baldiges Update. Das ist eben der Preis, den man für das Vergnügen bezahlt, das Werden einer neuer Version mitzuerleben. 🙂 https://developer.x-plane.com/2019/02/x-plane-11-32-real-weather-fix-gpu-memory-fix-maybe/ -
-