1. English

    1. 100555
      posts
    2. 300455
      posts
    3. 1781
      posts
    4. 135
      posts
    5. 1436
      posts
    6. 312
      posts
  2. Deutsch

    1. 55074
      posts
    2. 151388
      posts
    3. 1340
      posts
    4. 447
      posts
    5. 232
      posts
  3. Francais

    1. Discussion générale

      Discussion générale (pas de support)

      1695
      posts
    2. 2122
      posts
    3. 142
      posts
    4. 22
      posts
  4. Español

    1. 851
      posts
    2. 578
      posts
    3. 1411
      posts
    4. 109
      posts
    5. 118
      posts
    6. FAQ

      9
      posts
  5. Italian, Portugues

    1. PORTUGUES

      O fórum para todos os nossos amigos Portugueses e Brasileiros, organizado por J.Pinto & Alejandro Diaz

      738
      posts
    2. MS FS - ITALIAN DISCUSSION AND SUPPORT

      Il forum per tutti i nostri amici di lingua italiana, ospitato da Augusto Morosini

      1200
      posts
  6. Aerosoft Friends

    1. 9794
      posts
    2. 3877
      posts
    3. Events - VFR Day (English/German)

      All about the VFR day event. In English and German.

      93
      posts
    4. 3
      posts
  7. Round The World with Aerosoft

    1. Round The World: General Discussion, Suggestions

      What's this flight around the world? How can I join?

      300
      posts
    2. 4327
      posts
  • Posts

    • Zum Upgradepreis wurde alles gesagt und Fabian hat eine klare Aussage gemacht und bei der von dir verlinkten Seite geht es nicht um die Upgradepolicy sondern um das Produkte selber. Das kann hier gerne weiterdiskutiert werden. Wenn es aber hier auch nur wieder um die Upgradepolicy geht, wird auch dieser Topic wieder zugemacht, da alles gesagt wurde was es zu sagen gibt.
    • But a driving school would be nice indeed. Only problem I see are the different rules and regulations in Europe, worldwide and even within the EU. 
    •   1. Its very possible and I would assume they would be updating the aircraft software to fly RNP and LNAV/VNAV approaches as they are the future of instrument approaches.  I don't believe auto thrust is a requirement for an RNP approach, just that the aircraft is capable of RNP0.3 and has a vertical NAV function and of course the company is approved to conduct RNP approaches. 2. Good idea, I don't recall seeing that, but the new next gen models could do that. 3. I do remember that if you didn't put the FMS into INHIBIT mode on the legs page, and flew throw the missed approach area it would start to sequence. The sequencing isn't really the issue, its that I cant get the approach to load again after that.  If flying an ILS its not really an issue, but it makes its not possible to fly an RNAV approach if the FMS will not accept loading the approach again.  I even loaded another separate approach, and then loaded my original approach again and it still sequenced to the missed approach.  Its just a bug that I'm sure you can get to the bottom of.   The plane has great potential, and I'm looking forward to more updates.
    • And now for something warmer Flight Number
      WW7901 - Operated by Worldwide Virtual Date Friday, 15 December 2017 Depart CYYT - St. John's International Airport Arrive LPAZ - Santa Maria Airport Aircraft WW-DC30 Flight Time 10:48:00 Distance 1370 NM
    • Flight Number
      WW7855 - Operated by Worldwide Virtual Date Friday, 15 December 2017 Depart CYSJ - Saint John Airport Arrive CYYT - St. John's International Airport Aircraft              WW-DC30 Flight Time 03:39:36 Distance 559 NM    
    • Warum werden hier ständig die EDDH Threads geschlossen?   Wenn das so weiter geht haben wir bald 20 Threads zu dem Thema. Mein Vorschlag: einfach mal den Thread offen lassen.   Offensichtlich gibt es hier Diskussionsbedarf. Siehe dazu auch: http://www.simflight.de/2017/12/14/perle-professional-prepar3d/#comments   Und meine Frage wurde auch nicht beantwortet. Jedenfalls für mich.  
    • I guessed that answer to come at a point.   I belong to the last dozen of Germans without a car, maybe because I spend too much money for flightsim addons instead of a car    Those wanting to learn driving don't have a car (yet) either and those below 17 don't have it in general.   Kind regards, Michael
    • TBH, I have real car traffic with all possibles situations every day in my life, so not really any need to additionally simulated the whole shit
    • You can believe whatever you want, sure. And you can claim whatever you want. But it works for me and probably most other people. And if you export the route using the Airbus Extended selection you don't get an .fms file out of it. You just don't. Taking the Airbus Extended export option results in an .flp file and guess what: it works that way. You just select the wrong export option as is seen clearly in your screenshot and what I tried to address in my post on Monday. Please be careful when claiming false advertising on FlightFactors part when you struggle to handle PFPX. We are here to help but such untenable assertions do not help at all.   Please report back if my attached screenshot helps in any way.
          Cheers,   Jonas
    •   I'll investigate but in my own recordings that we made of startups there were two in rainy weather, one moderate rain, one serious rain this was not done. Perhaps a company specific thing. We seen a lot of that.   The overhead thing you mention is abnormal procedure and thus not simulated by us. It is just not something that pilots do to perform a flight. Keep in mind that we draw a rather rigorous line in the sand about that. We simulate the job of the pilot, not the training of the pilot.   Update on the pb thing, quick feedback from two bus pilots was clear, this might be practise in some countries under extreme conditions and both knew of the process, but is is most certainly not standard procedure, neither of the two had ever done it. That means we will not support it.