Jump to content


Welcome dear guest,

We like to ask you to log-in or to create an account if you don't have an account. Being a member of this forum allows you to post messages and gives you access to the free downloads. It is by far the fastest way to get any support for the many products we sell. Creating an account is fast and easy, certainly if you already have a Twitter or Facebook account. Do note we take your privacy very serious and will never allow any other company to access your information.

 

Wir bitten Sie, sich mit Ihren Log-in Daten im Forum anzumelden oder sich einen neuen Account anzulegen falls Sie noch über keinen verfügen. Als Mitglied des Forums können Sie Ihre Mitteilungen an andere Mitglieder oder an uns posten und Sie erhalten Zugriff auf kostenlose Downloads. Außerdem ist die Nutzung unseres Forums bei weitem der schnellste Weg um Support für die vielen Produkte zu bekommen, die wir verkaufen. Einen Account zu erstellen geht einfach und schnell, vor allem wenn Sie bereits bei Twitter oder Facebook registriert sind. Sie können sicher sein, dass wir die Privatsphäre unserer Mitglieder schätzen und schützen. Es wird keiner weiteren Firma gestattet Einsicht in Ihre Daten zu nehmen.

Guest Message by DevFuse
Photo

Engine performance, critical altitude


  • Locked Topic This topic is closed
4 replies to this topic

#1 CoolP

CoolP

    Major

  • _Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 209 Posts:
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 July 2012 - 14:18

Since buying the Dimona, she grew to become one of my favourite planes. The only downside I've discovered isn't a real downside, the engine is too strong at altitude.

I had a chat with Joachim about this a while back in another thread and he mainly explained that the aircraft.cfg entry reflects a turbocharged setting (turbocharged = 1) for the reason that the non charged entry resulted in a wrongly performing engine. He is right of course and you can try that by setting that parameter to 0 and watch how the engine performs. You may not like it, hence his decision to leave it like that. Perfectly reasonable!


Now I've stumbled upon this turbocharged 'issue' because I could climb on engine power to well over 13.000ft or something and the MP (Manifold Pressure, whereas the pressure may be misleading, it's more of a suction) didn't decrease at all. So I would have enough engine power to go even higher or just go very fast at 13.000. Looking at the aircraft.cfg entry, the critical altitude is set to 15.000ft, which means that you will achieve some 29.92 (sea level) MP until 15.000 and then slowly lose MP while climbing. Expect some one inch loss per 1000ft altitude gain.

So while the real plane with the Limbach L 2000 EB 1C 80HP engine isn't turbocharged, the sim rendition is (which makes sense with Joachim's statement in mind) but runs full MP up to 15.000ft. I guess the real plane would like that.


While one can manually retard the throttle when climbing, I was looking for a way to achieve this automatically, just like you would with a non turbocharged engine. Well, that's the intention of this thread, to present one way of doing so.

In more detail, you will have to look at the critical_altitude = 15000 setting in the aircraft.cfg and alter it to e.g. 1000ft. What this means is that anything over 1000ft will decrease the achievable MP with altitude gain. So the Dimona's engine will behave like a non turbocharged one while climbing, but will also maintain it's characteristics, as planned by Joachim. Perhaps even 0 or 1ft works, but I was happy with 1000 so far.


Since I only flew some flights with that setting and since I'm not the dev of this fine ship, I'm open to discussions of course. You don't alter much on the plane's FDE and it's well tuned gliding performance and drag values. You also don't raise unnecessary support tickets due to serious user mods. You just adjust the way the engine loses power with altitude, to avoid the mentioned 'overpower' situation.

What do you think? :)

Reverting back is easy of course. Either you make a backup of the file or you just re-establish those 15.000ft.
  • 2

#2 J.Schweigler

J.Schweigler

    SPECIFIC - 3D - DESIGN

  • _Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,055 Posts:
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 July 2012 - 11:15

The idea isn't bad at all! But I am not sure, about the issues above the critical altitude. Can't check it at the moment.

But the idea sounds good! :-)
  • 0

#3 CoolP

CoolP

    Major

  • _Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 209 Posts:
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 July 2012 - 15:30

Thanks for the kind words, Joachim. :) Don't hurry and enjoy this nice and warm weekend. But, of course, I'd like to know what you think of the small change after trying.
  • 0

#4 CoolP

CoolP

    Major

  • _Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 209 Posts:
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 August 2012 - 00:45

Did you find the time to try yet, Joachim?
  • 0

#5 J.Schweigler

J.Schweigler

    SPECIFIC - 3D - DESIGN

  • _Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,055 Posts:
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 August 2012 - 16:14

No sorry,

I have many other things to do at the moment
  • 0




0 User(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users