129 replies to this topic

[Shaun Fletcher]

Another part of France for your FSX. Select heading directly to Airport Toulouse now! The city of Toulouse is located in the south west of France and is an important location for the Midi-Pyrénées region. The airport is situated approx. 7km to the north west of the city centre and with its 6.5 million yearly passengers it is the sixth biggest in France. The airports history can look back to the maiden flights of aircraft like the Concorde or the A380. Airport Toulouse will also be available for X-Plane 10 Global soon

*Note: All buyers of the FSX version will get a free copy of the Airport Toulouse for X-Plane 10 as soon as it is available.

[Product Page]






More Screenshots

[BER428]

Yeeeees AVAILABLE !!!!

Let's go to heat up credit card ! .... 19,95 It is given!

[data63]

Any Chance of a reworked ADCAD that includes some parking in the Airbus-factory area?

Happy Landings

Juergen

[BER428]

I bought it ! ONE WORD : > MAGNIFIQUE <

Bravo ! It's awesome, your grass textures are so real ! DO you think it's possible to have this grass color for default grass texture in fsx ???

Thank you for this great job !

Kevin

[awf]

Don't going to pay for XP development so I will skip this one...

[BER428]

Don't going to pay for XP development so I will skip this one...

XP ?

[Rafal Haczek]

XP?

X-Plane.

[pmb]

Hello,

is it only me, that there are neither charts nor manual, only two pdf as Dummies?

Kind regards, Michael

[BER428]

X-Plane.

Of course... !

Folks often told me that my head is in the clouds

Thanks Rafal

[Guga Carvalho]

I have it now! Thank you so much aeroSOFT!

[BER428]

Hello,

is it only me, that there are neither charts nor manual, only two pdf as Dummies?

Kind regards, Michael

VAC AIRFIELD > https://www.sia.avia...7_AD-2.LFBO.pdf
VAC HELIPAD > https://www.sia.avia...7_AD-3.LFBO.pdf
IAC > https://www.sia.avia...7_AD-2.LFBO.pdf
ARR/DEP > https://www.sia.avia...7_AD-2.LFBO.pdf
AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION MANUAL > https://www.sia.avia...7_AD-2.LFBO.pdf

[HenryD]

Features:

• 
  Manual (German, English, French, Spanish)
• Lufthansa Systems FlightNav Inc. Charts

Above mentioned features are from the product page and I think your links are not the pdf-files which should be delivered with the product as they are part of the sales contract with Aerosoft you signed when concluding the download agreement. Of course charts can be obtained from other sites but if this is the case it should clearly be mentioned before accepting the sales contract shouldn't it?

Regards

Henry

[OPabst]

Above mentioned features are from the product page and I think your links are not the pdf-files which should be delivered with the product as they are part of the sales contract with Aerosoft you signed when concluding the download agreement. Of course charts can be obtained from other sites but if this is the case it should clearly be mentioned before accepting the sales contract shouldn't it?

Regards

Henry

Please read this two statements of Mathjis: Manual and Charts
As normally the Charts are part of the Manual, I think both will be following as soon as the charts are be send to Aerosoft.
And as you see there, some users don't accept a delay only based on the situation, that the manual/Charts are not finished, so who is reading a manual

[pmb]

Please read this two statements of Mathjis: Manual and Charts
As normally the Charts are part of the Manual, I think both will be following as soon as the charts are be send to Aerosoft.
And as you see there, some users don't accept a delay only based on the situation, that the manual/Charts are not finished, so who is reading a manual

Oliver, I would disagree here. Unfortunately, I do not have time to "read" the full manual. I was looking for remarks on compatibility, notably with France VFR (probably they are compatible, but sometimes there are little issues, maybe with library layering), and on suggested settings for sliders. Besides it just does not look too reputable if I open the "manual" of a recently bought commercial product and it states "Dummy".

I agree that I expect Aerosoft to deliver the two files as soon as possible.

Kind regards, Michael

[OPabst]

Yes Michael, the manual is important, but I see often questions here, which could be answered by the manual. So it is not common to look there first.
I wouldn't release a product without manual, even when it delays the release for weeks, but therefor you will be "killed" too.

[Matt_Smith]

Hows does the saying go... Damned if you do, damned of you don't?

[Jackson]

Is this airport for FS2004 version?

[Matt_Smith]

No it's FSX/Xplane 10 only.

[ArtAir]

Is this airport for FS2004 version?

It depends on FSX sales. I hope (really hope) FS9 will follow.
I think mr. Werlitz hears us.

[captain13chris]

Don't going to pay for XP development so I will skip this one...

Reason?

[Rafal Haczek]

I hope (really hope) FS9 will follow

We do join in hoping.
I've been waiting for a new version of Airbus Home for many years.

[BER428]

Is the hangar doors open like on Paris Charles de Gaulle?

[tulma]

Hello

Very nice scenery, sincerely, but fps killer, I find

I've less fps on Toulouse than on NiceX. Strange (Nice had more traffic)..... I obtain between 15 et 19fps on the taxiway and 17-20fps at takeoff or landing ... On NiceX, I'm always about 25-30fps (with the same graphic settings and UT2 to 90%)

I think that Toulouse is between NiceX and CDG or Orly, for the fps. Maybe "Toulouse" would love a better optimization !!!

Luc

[lazza]

Hello

Very nice scenery, sincerely, but fps killer, I find

I've less fps on Toulouse than on NiceX. Strange (Nice had more traffic)..... I obtain between 15 et 19fps on the taxiway and 17-20fps at takeoff or landing ... On NiceX, I'm always about 25-30fps (with the same graphic settings and UT2 to 90%)

I think that Toulouse is between NiceX and CDG or Orly, for the fps. Maybe "Toulouse" would love a better optimization !!!

Luc

Thanks for letting me know that. I was keen to find out fps before I buy. That is a real shame it's not great fps as I was looking forward to this airport

[tulma]

Lazza

I didn't said that Toulouse is a bad scenery. But on my PC, The fps are lower than on NiceX.
My PC : Core I7 2600K O/C 4.7GHz - Geforce 580Ti - Ram 8Go - Windows 7 64. Graphic settings high

With a better computer or less addons, traffic, autogen .... Toulouse can be a good choice.

Toulouse is very nice but, like much addons, maybe it need a better optimization .....

I think that with the last computers, we should have better performances on the payware sceneries.

Luc

[lazza]

Hi Tulma

I know you did not say it was bad, just not so great on FPS.
Well I have bought a bunch of Aerosoft airports about 6 more than in my sig around Greece, Turkey and Cyprus as well.
I have NIce and if Toulouse is worse than Nice then I dont want it. There is no reason it should be bad on fps.
I checked out Toulouse as default scenery and it is an area very easy on frames in FSX so the airport should be too.
I also have Paris CDG, the default area is bad on frames so the airport I expected to be bad too, not Toulouse

I think the developers need feedback like this, unfortunalty some Aerosoft Airports are bad on fps which spoils the experience others are good.

If this scenery had good FPS I would buy it, simple as that.

[Mathijs Kok]

Hi Tulma

I know you did not say it was bad, just not so great on FPS.
Well I have bought a bunch of Aerosoft airports about 6 more than in my sig around Greece, Turkey and Cyprus as well.
I have NIce and if Toulouse is worse than Nice then I dont want it. There is no reason it should be bad on fps.
I checked out Toulouse as default scenery and it is an area very easy on frames in FSX so the airport should be too.
I also have Paris CDG, the default area is bad on frames so the airport I expected to be bad too, not Toulouse

I think the developers need feedback like this, unfortunalty some Aerosoft Airports are bad on fps which spoils the experience others are good.

If this scenery had good FPS I would buy it, simple as that.

It has superb FPS per polygon as it is optimized to the latest standard, nothing to gain by doing things different, there is only gain by removing things and that is just not in our plans. Nice will have better fps for sure because it contains a lot less data, a lot less polygons and a lot less textures.

Now I fully agree that on some older products the optimization was not optimal, but in this case it it. If you want more fps you will have to use lower settings. No way around that. I am getting 30+ fps all over the airport btw on my standard, almost full, settings.

[Mathijs Kok]

As you will have our quality control department missed the lacking charts and manual with this project. We have uploaded a new version so if you miss these items just download the product again and all will be well. Sorry!

[pmb]

Lazza,

I just set up a new machine for FSX, slightly weaker than yours (some poor people have to live with mediocre systems) : i7-2600 / 3.4 GHz / 16 MB RAM / Geforce GTX 560 / Intel MB DZ68DB / Win 7 / 64. I've locked framrate to 20 fps, nearly all sliders at maximum (terrain shadows off, but framerate killer water 2.x at maximum). I am able to maintain those 20 fps in the default Cessna C172 (nearly the only plane I fly with my hardware XTOP panel) during taxiing plus takeoff. Those 20 fps feel fluent, no drops, thus I am contend.

BTW, I use France VFR Pyrenees as a nice supplement.

Regards, Michael

[BER428]

As you will have our quality control department missed the lacking charts and manual with this project. We have uploaded a new version so if you miss these items just download the product again and all will be well. Sorry!

Hello Mathijs


Will you do an update to open the hangar doors as we can do on other airports with the NAV 2? It would be really great.

I also noticed on 2 occasions (once in rwy14 config and another in rwy 32 config) that the PAPI was not well calibrated with the glide path.

Once in 737 and another in Lancair Legacy. Could you verify this?

Thank you! Otherwise the scene is beautiful! Nice work!

Regards

Kevin

[Mark Richards]

I have excellent FPS on it and love the scenery, perfect for doing Airbus and ATR delivery flights.

I might be on the other side of the world but love the Aerosoft range and slowly building my collection.

Thanks once again Aerosoft.

Mark


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD. Please excuse any Apple autocorrection.

[Mathijs Kok]

Lazza,

I just set up a new machine for FSX, slightly weaker than yours (some poor people have to live with mediocre systems) : i7-2600 / 3.4 GHz / 16 MB RAM / Geforce GTX 560 / Intel MB DZ68DB / Win 7 / 64. I've locked framrate to 20 fps, nearly all sliders at maximum (terrain shadows off, but framerate killer water 2.x at maximum). I am able to maintain those 20 fps in the default Cessna C172 (nearly the only plane I fly with my hardware XTOP panel) during taxiing plus takeoff. Those 20 fps feel fluent, no drops, thus I am contend.

BTW, I use France VFR Pyrenees as a nice supplement.

Regards, Michael

I just checked FPS again and I find the project to be very smooth. On my sub $800 machine I get a 50+ fps all around.

Attached thumbnail(s)

• 

[Matt_Smith]

No problems for me runs like a warm knife through butter

[tulma]

Hi

The fps depend of the computer, yes, but also of the differents addons installed, traffic settings, the aircraft addon used to fly ..... What settings have u to have 50fps ?

But, to be honest, after remaked my fsx.cfg, I've better fps now, with my settings and my addons (UTX, UT2, GEX, FranceVFR nextmesh). Now I've about 20fps (with UT2 traffic to 85%). It's not perfect but not bad.( 25-30 on NiceX )....

My cfg modifications now :

[BUFFERPOOLS]
RejectThreshold=262144

[JOBSCHEDULER]
AffinityMask=84

[GRAPHICS]
HIGHMEMFIX=1
TEXTURE_MAX_LOAD=2048

[Display]
TEXTURE_BANDWIDTH_MULT=70
UPPER_FRAMERATE_LIMIT=30
WideViewAspect=True

[Main]
DisablePreload=1
FIBER_FRAME_TIME_FRACTION=0.15

[DISPLAY.Device.NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti .0]
Mode=1920x1080x32
TriLinear=1

[TERRAIN]
LOD_RADIUS=6.500000









Luc

[BER428]

Hi

The fps depend of the computer, yes, but also of the differents addons installed, traffic settings, the aircraft addon used to fly ..... What settings have u to have 50fps ?

But, to be honest, after remaked my fsx.cfg, I've better fps now, with my settings and my addons (UTX, UT2, GEX, FranceVFR nextmesh). Now I've about 20fps (with UT2 traffic to 85%). It's not perfect but not bad.( 25-30 on NiceX )....

My cfg modifications now :

[BUFFERPOOLS]
RejectThreshold=262144

[JOBSCHEDULER]
AffinityMask=84

[GRAPHICS]
HIGHMEMFIX=1
TEXTURE_MAX_LOAD=2048

[Display]
TEXTURE_BANDWIDTH_MULT=70
UPPER_FRAMERATE_LIMIT=30
WideViewAspect=True

[Main]
DisablePreload=1
FIBER_FRAME_TIME_FRACTION=0.15

[DISPLAY.Device.NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti .0]
Mode=1920x1080x32
TriLinear=1

[TERRAIN]
LOD_RADIUS=6.500000









Luc

Hi Luc, what is your computer spec?

Hello Mathijs


Will you do an update to open the hangar doors as we can do on other airports with the NAV 2? It would be really great.

I also noticed on 2 occasions (once in rwy14 config and another in rwy 32 config) that the PAPI was not well calibrated with the glide path.

Once in 737 and another in Lancair Legacy. Could you verify this?

Thank you! Otherwise the scene is beautiful! Nice work!

Regards

Kevin

Mathijs don't forget me please....


regards

Kevin

[tulma]

Hello Kevin

My config : Core I7 2600K O/C 4.7GHz - Geforce 580Ti - Ram 8Go - Windows 7 64

Luc

[tulma]

84 give 1010100, I think.... But thank for your advise.

Bojote give me 84 for my 2700K - HT active : http://www.venetubo.com/fsx.html


But maybe it's not the best value for thye Affinitymask.... I'll see these interesting links

Luc

[Mathijs Kok]

Luc, what I showed you was a unmodified FSX on a machine you can buy for under $800. The images were done with our Airbus X Extended Alpha that's very complex addon.

Many of the tweaks you show are well know to our support department to cause issues. Both in what you see and in FPS. I know they are all popular on many forums but we have hardly seen any comment that makes serious sense. It's all anecdotal proof and when all things are combined you often end up with more problems then fixes. It's your system but I am almost 100% sure that using a non tweaked FSX.cfg and clean video driver will get you far better results

In your images you have very strange settings, are you really sure you want more trees and fake buildings and less objects that we added in the scenery? You paid for them after all! Is there a reason you do not want to follow the advice in the manual? And if so, are you really sure you want our help?

[Mathijs Kok]

Hi Luc, what is your computer spec?




Mathijs don't forget me please....


regards

Kevin

I will forward these issues, but so far I have not seen any confirmation of the issues and I simply do not seethe issues myself.
I am sure we'll not do the animated hangar door btw, we do not like to use radio's to animate stuff as it often cause support issues.