Recommended Posts

I have noticed that I was very afraid of performance. When i bought yesterday i was thinking " hmmm maybe you are buying a 9 FPS product to your computer" But made a 2:30 flight from Almeria to Frankfurt, the FPS was always bt 24-50 (with dynamic lights and gtx 970 4gb )

SO IM VERY HAPPY CONGRATS!

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fps are truelly amazing even better then the older NGX wich always had the best performance for me! 

 

They never dip under 35 fps even with heavy weather (asp4)

 

 

Thanks aerosoft!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very happy with the frame rate. Did three test flights in three different models and all went perfect. 

Thanks goes to the development team. Well done...well done indeed.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really can't believe just how good this is on frames, for a minute I thought I was in the Aerofly Airbus...;)! And I have everything ramped up pretty high with loads of add on's.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have excellent frames with the new bus.

No systems depth and "study level" can help when your frames are poor.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, gregoryv said:

No systems depth

 

No system depth? I think you have not understood this product well. It has in many part excellent system depth. We just do not model stuff like dual engine out plus an unconscious co-pilot. Mainly because it simply never happened. And as that is code that is only run when it happens it only affect memory load (not an issue in P3D v4.3) and not hardly any FPS. 

 

FPS is for 80% determined by modeling/texturing. The skill of the modeler.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I already said in an other thread - the FPS are amazing. The VC resolution is superb. But - the only ("look and feel") thingy that I am not happy about is the outside texture resolution of some parts of the aircraft. I love to take screenshots with an wing view for example and the texture resolutions of the engine mount and the "Do not step..." writings are very low - why? The Airbus looks great if you look at it from a decent distance but like I said wing views do not. Any chance to get better textures for the wing/engine?

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And I really appreciate that you have put so much work into the superb VC! 
Just for my lack of understanding - If I use f.e a 4096x4096 resolution livery will that solve my "problem" or has this nothing to do with it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It might make it as lot better. But will also eat up a LOT more graphical memory. If you have 8 Gb that is no problem, but if you have 3 Gb it could make things hard. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Mathijs Kok said:

 

No system depth? I think you have not understood this product well. It has in many part excellent system depth. We just do not model stuff like dual engine out plus an unconscious co-pilot. Mainly because it simply never happened. And as that is code that is only run when it happens it only affect memory load (not an issue in P3D v4.3) and not hardly any FPS. 

 

FPS is for 80% determined by modeling/texturing. The skill of the modeler.

Hi Mathijs, 

I think you totally didn't understand my comment.

I was talking about "other product" . A lot of people saying that "other product" having better system depth and etc.

I said that it isn't worth when your performance is poor.

I think your team did a great job and I am enjoying flying new bus ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now