Leptinos 0 Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 Hello to everyone, I made an observation concerning the loading of SIDs at Tegel airport (EDDT): I use the current AIRAC cycle (1802rev1) provided by Navigraph for the Digital Aviation CRJ 700/900. The data is loaded into the FMC of the CRJ (the correct date of the cycle is shown in monitor of the FMC). Now I choose a SID for one of the runways. For example: BKT6L for runway 26L. The FMC now only loads a short route containing the waypoint "RW" which is the first waypoint of the SID and exclusive for runway 26L. However, according to the charts there are several waypoints that are missing (DT262 TUBRI BKD). I took a closer look into the .txt-file provided by Navigraph (located here: root2P3Dv4\Ecosystem\aerosoft\Digital Aviation CRJ\NavData\PROC\EDDT.txt). I guess the problem is that only the SID-fragment "26L" is loaded and not the missing part "ALL" (see below). The problem occurs on other EDDT SIDs that are stored in the same format as shown below (e.g. BRAN2N). I guess if the SID is provided completely (which is the case at other airports) no problems occur. SID,BKD6L,26L,4 CA,0,259.0,2,600,0,0,0,0,0,0, CF,RW,52.545058,13.151039,0,TGL,256.9,5.1,260.0,4.6,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0, SID,BKD6L,26R,4 CA,0,259.0,2,600,0,0,0,0,0,0, CF,RW,52.545058,13.151039,0,TGL,256.9,5.1,258.0,4.3,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0, SID,BKD6L,ALL,5 IF,RW,52.545058,13.151039, ,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0, TF,DT262,52.531003,12.996778,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0, TF,TUBRI,52.722200,12.455753,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0, TF,BKD,53.034525,11.546217,0, ,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0, For me it is not clear if the file format provided by Navigraph is corrupted or if the CRJ is not reading the file correctly. But I thought it is worth to inform you about the situation/observation. Best regards and thank you very much for further information or a fix (if it's a bug, I don't know) in the future! Martin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blahhh 41 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Reported months ago but no news... Use the db from Aerosoft instead and procedures will be rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phlpeo 98 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 I tested it with the pmdg b737 and it appears to be a problem in the crj. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted February 7, 2018 Aerosoft Share Posted February 7, 2018 We'll test it with the last build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leptinos 0 Posted February 7, 2018 Author Share Posted February 7, 2018 vor 4 Stunden , blahhh sagte: Reported months ago but no news... Use the db from Aerosoft instead and procedures will be rights. vor 3 Stunden , Mathijs Kok sagte: We'll test it with the last build. Thanks for handeling the problem and sorry for reporting a potentially already known issue. :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Developer Hans Hartmann 3694 Posted February 15, 2018 Developer Share Posted February 15, 2018 This has been fixed in the pending update. Screenshot was made using your navdata excerpt. Please login to display this image. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leptinos 0 Posted February 17, 2018 Author Share Posted February 17, 2018 Awesome news! Thank you very much! Have a nice weekend! Martin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.