Jump to content

Further systems refinement? (Frank, do NOT read this ;-) )


Cheyenne Chief Pilot

Recommended Posts

Having noticed the level of detail to which a lot of CRJ systems have been developed already, is it correct to assume that some more work will be done on systems like hydraulics, bleeds and pressurization? It's cool to have all the bells and whistles associated with ice detection, protection and de-icing, for example, but wouldn't it be even cooler if we could also "really" switch hydraulics, bleeds, and packs off, instead of having "just" the clickspots, messages, and synoptic indications? In a SP1, maybe?

 

(No, Frank, I'm not talking about extensive failure modelling and abnormal procedures, just some more consequences of pilots' actions and a few more details during power-up and power-down of the CRJ. I mean, in the Airbus, at least fuel consumption stops, when you switch off the pumps ...   ;-)   )

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Motormike said:

I would pay for it as an additional upgrade

 

 

For the "small print" mentioned above certainly but, IMO, not for the stuff I was referring to: The CRJ already is 25% to 28% more expensive than the AS Airbus ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy & Terms of Use