Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dhazelgrove

Screens

54 posts in this topic

1 hour ago, dhazelgrove said:

595a36b08c26a_Prepar3D2017-07-0312-26-55-38.thumb.jpg.6cde8fb521aae74b3240c4d59a5721fd.jpg

 

AI at Bodo.

 

Dave

 

Wow. Historically correct. Both F-104Gs (331sq) and green CF104s (334sq) :wub:

 

More info in english here for those who are interested. The articles page btw has some pretty good stories

 

http://www.starfighter.no/indeng.html

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Eivin Stenso said:

Wow. Historically correct. Both F-104Gs (331sq) and green CF104s (334sq) :wub:

 

More info in english here for those who are interested. The articles page btw has some pretty good stories

 

http://www.starfighter.no/indeng.html

I'm finding there are issues with the ORBX EU Norway - specifically here at Bodo. All those military hangars, and only six of them have been enabled for AI MIL_COMBAT parking spots.

More, they're all down the west end of the military side of things - as shown. There are no parking codes, so I can't separate out the two squadrons. I have F-104s parked over on the civil side!

You don't happen to know which squadron was where, do you?

 

I've isolated the Bodo AFCAD, so it's going into the workshop for a major injection of all sorts of military parking.

 

The AI model used is the offering from The Owl's Nest, and it's showing its age. The glass is definitely strange in P3D.

 

Dave

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, dhazelgrove said:

I'm finding there are issues with the ORBX EU Norway - specifically here at Bodo. All those military hangars, and only six of them have been enabled for AI MIL_COMBAT parking spots.

More, they're all down the west end of the military side of things - as shown. There are no parking codes, so I can't separate out the two squadrons. I have F-104s parked over on the civil side!

You don't happen to know which squadron was where, do you?

 

I've isolated the Bodo AFCAD, so it's going into the workshop for a major injection of all sorts of military parking.

 

The AI model used is the offering from The Owl's Nest, and it's showing its age. The glass is definitely strange in P3D.

 

Dave

 

No. But I'll ask around. 

 

Stand by

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we have more "screens" of the Lightning??  I'm curious to see progress on any upcoming T.5 repaints.  Thanks.

 

--WH

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Newsflash:

 

I've managed to get hold of a guy who served at 331sq in 74/75 and he tells me that 331sq (F-104G for high altitude interception) had line in the east end, and parking/maintenance in the mountain there. 334sq. Follow taxiway for guidance. (CF104 for anti shipping) had line in the west end. 331sq also had two F-104G ready at all times in designated hangars.   

 

Btw Any chance you make this available for the the public as a downloadable package? He seems very interested in that. And I'll bet there are many more.  Me for one.Maybe a couple of shelters / spots available for vistiing Lighntings?

 

E  

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Eivin Stenso said:

Newsflash:

 

I've managed to get hold of a guy who served at 331sq in 74/75 and he tells me that 331sq (F-104G for high altitude interception) had line in the east end, and parking/maintenance in the mountain there. 334sq. Follow taxiway for guidance. (CF104 for anti shipping) had line in the west end. 331sq also had two F-104G ready at all times in designated hangars.   

 

Btw Any chance you make this available for the the public as a downloadable package? He seems very interested in that. And I'll bet there are many more.  Me for one.Maybe a couple of shelters / spots available for vistiing Lighntings?

 

E  

Thanks for that. 331 East/334 West. There will also need to be some uncoded parking and some mil_cargo spots.

Whether or not I can make the mods available will depend on what ORBX tells me - as it's their product I'll be modifying.

I'll put up some screens of the finished article when I'm done.

 

Norwegian C-130 skins might be a problem. Certainly MAIW (my usual starting point for AI) have never touched Norway.

 

Dave

 

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

595ce8868c570_Prepar3D2017-07-0514-10-50-15.thumb.jpg.ddd251fb8d4a8506270d6ff12dd37607.jpg

 

595ce88739dce_Prepar3D2017-07-0514-12-23-45.thumb.jpg.4531d46f8eab9eead254fab3a9013288.jpg

 

Progress report: I've found some AI C-130 Norwegian skins for the HTAI FSX-converted C-130s - available from MAIW.

I've also found better AI models of the CF-104s and F-104Gs - also 2-seaters. They're by Michael Pearson and available from avsim.

 

These photos show the new Ai in place (excuse the red wing). What do you think?

 

Dave

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice, indeed. Only thing missing now are swarms of Soviet bears and badgers coming in from the east. :)

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Eivin Stenso said:

Very nice, indeed. Only thing missing now are swarms of Soviet bears and badgers coming in from the east. :)

 

 

There's a choice of armaments, too.

Are wingtip tanks always fitted?

 

Dave

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, dhazelgrove said:

There's a choice of armaments, too.

Are wingtip tanks always fitted?

 

Dave

 

Negative. They are off for high altitude supersonic interception. The missiles will then be carried in pairs underneath the fuselage. This is the lowest supersonic drag config. For patrols and subsonic interceptions you will have tiptanks  and missiles on wing-pylons which gives the lowest subsonic drag.

 

E

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Eivin Stenso said:

Negative. They are off for high altitude supersonic interception. The missiles will then be carried in pairs underneath the fuselage. This is the lowest supersonic drag config. For patrols and subsonic interceptions you will have tiptanks  and missiles on wing-pylons which gives the lowest subsonic drag.

 

E

595d2fdc4065c_Prepar3D2017-07-0519-19-43-33.thumb.jpg.b926bade2b24c8b124b69e420da162f4.jpg

 

595d2fdce1343_Prepar3D2017-07-0519-24-57-88.thumb.jpg.d6d528035af3cd0471d4ffca90a6d9c5.jpg

 

They'll need supply from these as well. Is the propeller tip colour correct? These are showing yellow, but I have other options available.

 

Dave

 

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Hi guys

 Sorry to be a bugbear, , but could you at least have a Lightning somewhere in the screenshot !!...... This is after all the " Lightning " section of the help forum .<_<

 Dave

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're right ofc. I'm afraid we went a little off topic here. Maybe a moderator can clean this thread up a bit and we'll continue the ai-discussion in private.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

595f3f0a45de3_Prepar3D2017-07-0619-32-22-13.thumb.jpg.7ddf5ee14d6c237793fbc663d13ba749.jpg

Just for completeness.....

 

Dave

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, dhazelgrove said:

 

Just for completeness.....

 

Dave

 

   ..... Much better.... now if you just used the Falcon UL or Mitchellwing instead of the trike ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fictional F6 by Cameron. (RNoAF) Quite nice though.

 

GIe839F.jpg

 

8GuDtZq.jpg

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lightnings1.thumb.jpeg.ec7c91ba41e4b8a42e5807612bdabe61.jpeg

 

Very nice. Are you going to do 65 Squadron aircraft to go with your 145 Squadron aircraft? Perhaps some 2T aircraft as well?

 

Dave

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly don't see why not.. I was after another repaint to do and I think that'll fit the bill nicely! 

 

C.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2017-7-16_16-21-43-125.thumb.jpg.fe123011ed955d8ee7b5aed22687facb.jpg

 

XS418 done with 145 Squadron featuring her dayglo stripes.. One down a few more to go

 

C.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TheCameronPerson said:

 

 

XS418 done with 145 Squadron featuring her dayglo stripes.. One down a few more to go

 

C.

    Hard to make out , but is your tail stripe right ?  on the T5 it should extend up over the fin, and you are going to have to adjust the font , "418" is smaller and angular  than on the T4 ( so much for standardisation;) ) (and it has the seat and canopy warning stencils)

 D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2017-7-17_20-19-29-242.thumb.jpg.ad4296c1dbf227cd23c3086f2a1b2814.jpg

 

Thanks for the heads up, changed the font on the nose but maybe made it too small, what do you reckon?

 

C.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Yes , too small and too thick. .

Get a photo of the aircraft  and size it as a layer so  the roundel fits ( in height)  if its not true side view. also note where the red comes to on the fin tip.

 D

418.thumb.jpg.e8d27df91c7bf146f44bf42eae4d72ba.jpg

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0