Dreamflight767 5 Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 Hello: I am trying to fly the buses on LAX-Hawaii legs but I am having trouble with fuel quantities; I don't have enough. Does anyone have a work around for the limited fuel amounts - to increase the amount of fuel on the airplanes? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabretooth78 56 Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 You may find this helpful: I've applied this "fix" to my A321s as it reflects the additional optional fuel tank Airbus offers, which jetBlue (which I fly virtually) uses on their aircraft. Long story short, in bold are the lines I've edited (I think I caught them all!) - make sure you save a copy of the originals in case you mess something up! The following updates the physical capacity available in the fuel dialog: Quote aircraft.cfg [FUEL] // A320 & A321 fuel_type = 2 number_of_tank_selectors = 2 electric_pump = 1 fuel_dump_rate = 0.0Center1 = -2.55, 0.00, -0.00, 2938.69, 0 //Center1 = -2.55, 0.00, -0.00, 2180, 0 LeftMain = -8.89, -21.50, -0.00, 2061, 0 RightMain = -8.89, 21.50, -0.00, 2061, 0 The following edit updates the capacity in the MCDU for "automatic" fuel loading: Quote MCDU2c.XML <!-- A319 --> (L:AB_TypeIdent, number) 21 == (L:AB_TypeIdent, number) 22 == || if{ 156 (>L:MCDU2_FP_max_Pax, number) 17.00 (>L:MCDU2_FP_max_Cargo, number) 19.15 (>L:MCDU2_FP_max_Fuel, number) 75.50 (>L:MCDU2_FP_max_Tow, number) 39.73 (>L:MCDU2_FP_empty_weight, number) } <!-- A320 --> (L:AB_TypeIdent, number) 31 == (L:AB_TypeIdent, number) 32 == || if{ 180 (>L:MCDU2_FP_max_Pax, number) 17.00 (>L:MCDU2_FP_max_Cargo, number) 19.15 (>L:MCDU2_FP_max_Fuel, number) 77.40 (>L:MCDU2_FP_max_Tow, number) 41.24 (>L:MCDU2_FP_empty_weight, number) } <!-- A321 --> (L:AB_TypeIdent, number) 41 == (L:AB_TypeIdent, number) 42 == || if{ 220 (>L:MCDU2_FP_max_Pax, number) 17.00 (>L:MCDU2_FP_max_Cargo, number) 21.46 (>L:MCDU2_FP_max_Fuel, number) 89.00 (>L:MCDU2_FP_max_Tow, number) 46.86 (>L:MCDU2_FP_empty_weight, number) } The following edit updates the capacity in the fuel planner: Quote Aircraft_320_321.xml <!-- Design weights --> <mtow>89000</mtow> <mtw>89400</mtw> <mlw>75000</mlw> <bow>46856</bow> <mzfw>73800</mzfw> <maxpayload>19900</maxpayload> <centertank>8934</centertank> <lefttank>6263</lefttank> <righttank>6263</righttank> <maxfuelonboard_kg>21460</maxfuelonboard_kg> <maxusablefuel_kg>21350</maxusablefuel_kg> <maxusablefuel_gal>7110.2</maxusablefuel_gal> Hope that helps! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreamflight767 5 Posted May 22, 2017 Author Share Posted May 22, 2017 It does very much. Do you notice any changes to the way the airplane flies or handles? Does making this change effect anything else on the airplane i.e. weight and balance? Take care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreamflight767 5 Posted May 22, 2017 Author Share Posted May 22, 2017 Another question actually. How might we go about adding fuel to the ACJ airplanes? Those airplanes have the incorrect fuel quantities too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabretooth78 56 Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 No change in handling other than what you might expect from having slightly more weight. I've found you sometimes maybe have to pay a little more attention on climb out if flying manually, especially around the acceleration altitude after a steep climb, as it can be a little sluggish picking up airspeed if you're not careful. Or maybe that's just because I'm accustomed to flying the lighter A320 much more often, or I may have messed something else up... Not sure about the ACJ as I don't have it, but my guess would likely be in the aircraft.cfg under the [Fuel] header as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dreamflight767 5 Posted June 2, 2017 Author Share Posted June 2, 2017 Thank you for your "fix". It works great! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.