Qseries 153 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Hey, I'd like to ask if some of you are using Aerosoft's Manchester X and whether it does work in P3D since the latest update? Currently I'm using a competitors product, but the quality of the textures and the buildings seems a lot better in the Aerosoft / IDS version. I'd like to change to the Aerosoft version, but I'm a bit feared of bad performance, as a lot of people report problems with VAS and FPS in P3D with that product. Are there any people who are using the newest version of Manchester X in P3D, and are pleased with it, and can tell something whether it's usable now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thokle 186 Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 I can't recommend Manchester X in any way. Standing at the gate with the NGX and a VAS usage of 3750 MB says all. Even FlyTampa Amsterdam with HD textures and all settings in the config tool has a better VAS usage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sydney1962 35 Posted March 24, 2017 Share Posted March 24, 2017 VAS and FPS are totally different things, in regard to VAS it depends on your system, have tested both with PMDG 737NGX and have 1GB free vas, ( VAS USAGE 2950 MB) while other people receive OOM errors. it is a total sum of products used at the same moment when flying. have myself disabled ORBX Vector over western europe, what brought me extra 400-500 mb free vas, so no more OOM issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted March 27, 2017 Aerosoft Share Posted March 27, 2017 On 3/24/2017 at 4:37 PM, thokle said: I can't recommend Manchester X in any way. Standing at the gate with the NGX and a VAS usage of 3750 MB says all. Even FlyTampa Amsterdam with HD textures and all settings in the config tool has a better VAS usage. That is extreme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thokle 186 Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 vor 9 Stunden , Mathijs Kok sagte: That is extreme. With the good old Nvidia driver 376.33 it is still between 3400 and 3500MB. Still too much for a small airport like Manchester. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.