busychild 20 Posted May 20, 2016 Share Posted May 20, 2016 Today i updated EDDT to the latest version 1.01 and made some testflights again. The test scenario remained the same but i used some lower settings and tested two more airports (Athens from FlyTampa and Warsaw from Drzewiecki): Testcase: 4nm final approach (FSipanel), Autolanding Simulator: P3Dv3.2 Aircraft: PMDG 737-800WL Weather: Clear Skies LoD: High, Tessellation Factor: High, Mesh resolution: 5m, Texture resolution: 60cm Scenery Complexity: Extremely Dense Autogen vegetation density: None Autogen building density: None No traffic View: Fixed Cockpit View FPS Recorded via Fraps CPU: i7 4790k GC: 980GTX All approaches were made with identical settings in the simulator. Here are the results for the approaches: EKCH 04L (Flytampa): Max FPS: 63 Avg FPS: 55 LOWW 29 (Flytampa) Max FPS: 73 Avg FPS: 54,9 EDDM 08R (Taxi2Gate) Max FPS: 65 Avg FPS: 56 EGLL 09R (Aerosoft Mega Airport London Heathrow) Max FPS: 58 Avg FPS: 48,8 LGAV 21L (FlyTampa) Max FPS: 59 Avg FPS: 53,8 EPWA 33 (Drzewiecki) Max FPS: 63 Avg FPS: 53,9 And here are the results for EDDT 08R: Max FPS: 53 Avg FPS: 45,7 --- Unfortunately the update doesn't bring better performance. It's still the worst airport in terms of performance i've currently installed... Are there any news about the issues? Thanks and best regards Florian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chok 49 Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 I've done 3-4 flights to and from Tegel since updating to V.1.01. and i see a little improvement in performance (it seems a bit less stuttery, but the frames are still low) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedrodowd 8 Posted May 21, 2016 Share Posted May 21, 2016 Hi Guys Thanks for your efforts in getting us an update so quickly, and for showing continued commitment to improving the performance and usability of the airfield. I know that (like Heathrow) the airfield is surrounded by dense autogen and as such represents a significant challenge to both frames per second and memory usage. Like the previous posts sadly I have installed the airfield and have not seen any improvement in peformance per frame and memory usage. I would be hard pressed to see any difference to the v1 released a few weeks ago, I also experienced an OOM fairly quickly (running settings that work with all other airfields - Excluding Dublin of course). Many thanks for your continued efforts in trying to get this scenery fixed, I will eagerly await further assistance or advice from Aerosoft and the developers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
busychild 20 Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 @Mathijs Kok Are there any news about the performance issues? Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerosoft Aerosoft Team [Inactive Account] 51558 Posted May 30, 2016 Aerosoft Share Posted May 30, 2016 No, as far as I am aware there are no further updates scheduled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
busychild 20 Posted May 30, 2016 Share Posted May 30, 2016 This is a shame as the scenery itself looks really good... Thanks anyway for getting back to me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djembe 5 Posted May 31, 2016 Share Posted May 31, 2016 On 30/5/2016 at 3:44 PM, Mathijs Kok said: No, as far as I am aware there are no further updates scheduled. And what happend with the bug reported here? Will be ever repared? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.