Speedbird ATC

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Speedbird ATC last won the day on April 2

Speedbird ATC had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

78 Excellent

About Speedbird ATC

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

2729 profile views
  1. And the "X-Plane version" you saw was a different plane entirely, made by JARDesign, and is being distributed by Aerosoft. That plane has nothing to do with this A330. While I am at it, I should add that I do not think anyone at Aerosoft have plans to bring this A330 to X-Plane. (I wish I was wrong about this though )
  2. Have you ever used one though? In the world of X-Plane, Virtual Cabins are considered standard, and yet not too many people I have found use them, with the exceptions of wingviews. In MSFS, a Virtual Cabin is very likely to be a huge FPS killer, and thus probably isn't worth it. I am sure it would be nice though, just not THAT nice...
  3. Your username is very inappropriate for a forum of a developer that mostly makes Airbus aircraft. Oh, can I share the Oreo?
  4. Just a fun unrelated fact: FMC is actually the term for the software: Basically, the operating terms. The actual hardware interface is referred to as a CDU, (On Airbus the MCDU)!
  5. Sorry, but when Airbus themselves still have not built a single one of these planes, how on earth is Aerosoft supposed to reverse engineer one for us?
  6. Here is another one (For those who don't get it, this is the Stage One booster of a Saturn V. So I guess you could call it the Alpha stage...)
  7. Correct me if I am wrong but wouldn't that flight need delivery tanks? (Which I am fairly sure you guys are not modelling...)
  8. It would be nice to see, but if Aerosoft don't do it I am sure one of our talented third party repainters will do it for us!
  9. I disagree. Whilst the previous livery was very nice, I felt it looked more like something a special livery would be. WIth the exception of the bandit stripe and black titles, I personally almost prefer this livery.
  10. Well, Cathay Dragon use the same planes as Dragonair, considering they are the same company! They probably chose the repaint for its simplicity, and as Dragonair was an A333 operator I am sure a few of us would like to fly it!
  11. For some reason I had a dream about the Aerosoft Forums: I had a dream that Aerosoft had chosen to develop an A340-600... Oh well, shame I didn't get to fly it in my dreams...
  12. Can I ask why people are complaining about this plane getting more features then we expected?
  13. That has to be the most detailed external model cabin (So not counting Captainsim ) ever made for FS.
  14. I never regretted for a second moving to P3D. The performance increase is very noticeable, I have never had an oom, and the graphical increase is so dramatic I don't think I will be able to bring myself to ever fly in FSX again, even though lots of my old favorite aircraft are still there. If by other platforms you mean X-Plane, that still has loads of issues. There is no decent solution for weather, other then Ortho4xp which takes Gbs upon GBs of space there is no FTX Global like solution for global scenery textures, you still suffer from similar frame issues to P3D (Worse if you lack a good GPU like me) and sadly, there is not a single airliner simulation that is reached the level MSFS simulations by the likes of FSLabs, PMDG, and Aerosoft have reached. Don't get me wrong, X-Plane has potential, and I personally think that refusing to give it a try would be foolish, as X-Plane does offer a lot that MSFS lacks, but it just isn't ripe yet. Welp! My daily rants are over, now to go back to work instead of responding to strangers on an internet forum...
  15. Look. I realize I should quit replying to posts like this, at least for a little while, but no. The plane has obviously been delayed but the recent changing of a release date had nothing to do with any delay of any release. As Aerosoft keep saying: The release dates are PLACEHOLDERS! They mean nothing!