Nicrative

Members
  • Content count

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

About Nicrative

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Groundwork

Recent Profile Visitors

1824 profile views
  1. Hello, I tried to use the "search" function to see if anyone had reported about this already. I know this is not a bug but more of a feature as it's just a result of how Aerosoft has built to CFD. So, if for any reason the connection is lost between the two parties sharing the cockpit it will state "connection error" on the CFD menu and there is no way to bring back the connection so basically the shared cockpit flight is then lost. The reason why I am reporting this is because I would like to Aerosoft know about this and reconsider a possibility to restore the connection after a lost connection if not on the A320 series but on the upcoming A330 which will have CFD introduced as well. On A320 it doesn't become a too big problem as you mainly flew medium to short legs but on A330 where you fly pretty much always long haul the possibility of losing the connection on some point of the flight increases. And the last thing you want to see if a lost connection that is not recoverable after 7-8 hours of flying. So please aerosoft try to make the CFD at least on the A330 (I would not mind it on A320 either) like so you are able to reset the connection without reloading the aircraft. Now it's just a bit dull that you have just one shot to try the connection and if it gives you the error you have to start all over again. If this post doesn't belong here but rather on the A330 preview thread, a moderator can move it there. Best regards, Nicrative
  2. Hello Stephen, thanks for the advice. Did not know that. However I think it doesn't solve the main issue here as I am sure that not everyone who flies off from Helsinki on vatsim/ivao will manually edit the airport via the editor. Would it be possible for PFPX to include a edited profile or whatever it's called on the next PFPX update or something, so it would change the system to correct one for everyone then without manual inputs. That would be excellent.
  3. Hello, I am I1 rated VATSIM controller in Finland and the FIR director of Finland. I have noticed a common mistake that happens with traffic generating their routes with PFPX. The routing out from Helsinki is ALWAYS generated wrong when it comes to automatic generating. The SID system in Helsinki is a bit different from the one we see mostly around the world. In Helsinki each SID is named completely different to prevent misunderstanding (or so does the Finnish traffic authority state out). Therefore the SIDs wont take the aircraft straight to their first waypoint. Instead they fly the SID and when the SID ends they are supposed to make a direct to the first waypoint of the flightplan. Therefore it's vital for the aircraft to file their flightplan via a correct TMA exit points which are stated on AIP Finland. Currently when you auto generate a route with PFPX it pretty much always gives out EVIRO as the first waypoint which is inside the TMA and therefore not a valid TMA exit. It would be very nice to get this issue fixed. If PFPX would automatically generate a correct routing out from Helsinki there would be no need to amend the flight plan by VATSIM controller. The controller software recognizes the first waypoint and issues a corresponding SID for the flight. If the first waypoint is EVIRO it will not issue a SID at all and the flightplan has to be changed accordingly to get it right and realistic. Here is a chart where you can see which SID leads to which TMA exit. And also some additional information included. It would be great to have PFPX planning routes via the waypoints presented on the left column. That way it would give realistic CMFU valid routes out from Helsinki. I will point out here once more. No IRL flight ever has planned their route via EVIRO, and if they have, the Finnish authority would have rejected the flight plan anyways because of incorrect routing. Best regards, Nicrative
  4. I'm sorry to let you guys down who have been waiting the EasyJet unicef livery. I have been extremely busy with my life lately. So haven't had time for simming that much. :/
  5. Thanks Faust. And yes, that scenery is excellent freeware! DetCord, livery should be now compatible with livery manager as well. I haven't been using that myself that much because the "old fashioned" way is not too hard either. But for those who like to use the livery manager, you're welcome.
  6. If no-one else is already making this I can accept the challenge. I think one reg is enough for you as aircraft in other ways seems to share the same livery. Although I'll be busy the rest of the week so I'll be able to start this livery next week earliest. If anyone else is able to make it faster, or someone is already making it, please let me know
  7. Atlantic Airways livery is now ready for download. Enjoy guys! Download link: http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/files/file/2882-a319-cfm-atlantic-airways-oy-rci/ Nicrative
  8. Version 1.01

    2389 downloads

    Atlantic Airways A319 CFM repaint for Aerosoft A319. Repaint by Jouka Ahponen Enjoy!
  9. For the guys waiting the Atlantic Airways livery. It should be ready today or tomorrow if nothing comes up.
  10. I have one under work now. But I am not sure about when to release it as I am doing it slow and steady. Also Aerosoft doesn't have 34 windows paintkit yet updated so got to wait for that as well. Nicrative