Jespersson

member
  • Content Count

    72
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

17 Good

1 Follower

About Jespersson

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Airwork

Recent Profile Visitors

1178 profile views
  1. Jespersson

    Sudden short banking on final ILS approach

    I can confirm that I have the exact same issue. Mathijs explanation sounds very likely to be fair but I agree with Meyerflyer that I wish there was some magical fix for this
  2. Jespersson

    A320 CFM vs IAE climb performance

    No, It's the temperature calculated by the aircraft which should give a correct result.
  3. Hi! I have recognised quite significant differences in the take-off and climb performance of the different engine options for the A320. So far I have not flown both engine versions of the A319 or 321 so I can't say for sure that the same applies to them. But I did some testing and got these results. I know that the engines are slightly weaker on the IAE but the climb rate and take-off distance is quite significantly different. Of course I don't know all the facts of the buses but the IAE seems to climb like an A340-300 at times (which we all know is not a good thing ) so I'd love some input on this from someone who really know how the buses are supposed to behave. For testing purposes I used clear weather and no winds. Let me know if you need any additional info. Kind regards Jesper Version 1.2.1.3 Aircraft - A320 CFM Flaps - 1 TOW - 60 400kg Flex temp - 63 QNH - 1013 Outside temp - 14c Airport & Rwy - ESGG 03 Distance to Vr - 1440m Time to Vr - 26 seconds Climbout rate - 4000ft/min Time to CL-power (1500ft agl) - 1 min 2 seconds V1 - 132 Vr - 139 V2 - 140 Aircraft - A320 IAE Flaps - 1 TOW - 60 400kg Flex temp - 63 QNH - 1013 Outside temp - 14 Airport & Rwy - ESGG 03 Distance to Vr - 1830m Time to Vr - 42 seconds Climbout rate - 1500ft/min Time to CL-power (1500ft agl) - 1 min 42 seconds V1 - 132 Vr - 139 V2 - 140
  4. Hi! I had the same issue but another workaround is to rename the texture folder to the same format Aerosoft has (texture.XXXXX). Just don't forget to change the same name in the aircract.cfg and everything should be just fine! Kind regards Jesper
  5. Jespersson

    Repaint requests

    Hi! I would love to see Brussels Airlines Aerosmurf for the new buses. The Aerosmurf is the only one currently not available to find anywhere. Kind regards Jesper Persson
  6. Jespersson

    Airbus Professional livery request.

    Hi! I would love to see Brussels Airlines Aerosmurf for the new buses. Of course I'd like all the special liveries to be made by you but the Aerosmurf is the only one currently not available to find anywhere. Kind regards Jesper Persson
  7. I've done all the changes that Dave brought up and it has dramatically improved performance to around 30-70 fps depending on scenery, aircraft etc... I'm really happy with the result and all the advice given in this thread. Thank you all!
  8. Jespersson

    Incorrect RAAS call-out

    Will check this! Thanks! /Jesper
  9. Hi! I always load the aircraft in the turn around state but for some reason the speed brakes are alway armed and I usually have to move my speed brake axis up and down a few times before it works properly. I have assigned all controls with FSUIPC so I'm not sure if there's an issue with this or the panel state config. Kind regards Jesper
  10. Jespersson

    Incorrect RAAS call-out

    Hi! I'm not sure if I'm supposed to ask for support by you or by the airport devs, but I have a few airports where there are wrong callouts. For example, at the new MK-studios Lisbon i get a "On taxiway" call when on the main runway. Kind regards Jesper
  11. Thanks Dave, really appreciate the advice!
  12. Many thanks for this my friend! I will do some experimenting later tonight. In regards to the disk processing speed, would a SSD make much of a difference? Both my disks have quite a few years behind them so a new disk is the next planned upgrade for me. Kind regards Jesper
  13. Hi everyone! I'm trying to analyze my system and figure out the best way to optimize performance in P3D. Currently I usually have 15-30 FPS in an airport environment and about twice as much mid air which I personally believe is a bit low for my system. I recently installed a brand new GTX 1080 card which to be honest didn't make that much of a difference performance wise (from a GTX 960). I'm not really an expert on how different applications uses the system so I figured I might just ask here instead. What I've been able to understand so far is that by looking in the performance monitor the CPU cores are mostly maxed out and the graphics card is at about 30%. My old graphics card was always at 90%-100%. RAM and hard drives are also working on low levels. My questions are basically: 1: Is the performance reasonable for my system or should it be better? 2: What can I do to improve performance other than lowering the settings dramatically? My specs are: OS: Windows 10 CPU: i7-6700 3,40GHz Graphics: GTX1080 RAM: 16GB Display: Samsung 34" curved - 3440x1440 Hard Drives: 500GB for system and 750GB for games (Neither are SSDs). P3D settings: FXAA: Off AA: 4xMSAA Texture filtering: 2x Texture resolution: Medium 1024x1024 Game resolution: 3440x1440x32 Vsync: On Tripple Buffering: On Target frame rate: 35 Mipmap panels: Off Detail level: High Tesselation factor: High Mesh resolution: 5m Texture resolution: 1m High resolution terrain: Off Scenery complexity: Extremely dense Autogen draw distance: High Vegetation density: Dense Building density: Very dense Dynamic autogen vegetation: Off Water detail: Medium Bathymetry: Off Reflections: User vehicle Special effects detail: Medium Special effects distance: Medium HDR: On Dynamic reflections: Off Dynamic lighting: On Landing lights illuminate ground: On Lens flare: Off Shadow quality: Medium Shadow draw distance: Low Casting and recieving: Internal vehicle only Weather is controlled by Active sky with standard settings. Some of my addons: Many airport addons ORBX: FTX Global FTX Europe FTX Trees HD FTX Vector (with only Highways and Primary roads activated) EU England REX w soft clouds AS for P3D v4 Kind regards Jesper
  14. Good evening everyone! Sorry to start a new thread on the same topic as this: http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/137611-10000-feet-seatbelt-action/ I love the buses so far and even though there are a few small bugs here and there they are a pleasure to fly. I just have one personal opinion to add to the seat belt sign discussion in the previous thread. I believe it's rather obvious that the passenger signs should be a part of the checklist when crossing 10 000 feet as it is a part of most European SOPs. However if you like me usually fly an airline that mostly uses high altitude airports you will in most cases end up with clouds a few thousand feet above 10 000ft on a normal day. If there are thunderstorms even more so. I was just thinking if there could be some sort of compromise done here. You guys know the technology behind this better than any of us so I won't go into that but here are just a few ideas. 1. Would it be possible to just have a reply to the checklist so the pilots would just confirm the position the switch is in? After all we are flying the damn thing so in my opinion it wouldn't be too much to ask that the pilot turns the switch off when he/she finds the situation appropriate. That would also probably be helpful for people from other regions with other SOPs as it wouldn't force them to switch it off. I know you can turn it on manually agian but how realistic is that really? 2. Would it be possible to use the auto position instead if you wan't it to be turned off at 10 000ft and the on position as a manual option? (Wasn't the old buses configured like this?) When descending it's less of a problem as there is nothing keeping you from switching it on before 10 000ft. 10 000 ft is after all the minimum altitude to turn the seat belt sign off, but in reality it's always up to the flight crew and how they feel about the current situation. Sure it should be part of the checklist but to me it seems wrong to have a forced function here as there are many situations when the crew would take a different decision. Have a good night guys! Looking forward to the future updates (and the A330)! Kind regards Jesper
  15. Have a look at this https://www.avsim.com/home/reviews/scenery/review-aerosoft-mega-airport-lisbon-v20-r2496/