• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

21 Excellent

About jordanal

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Airwork
  1. jordanal

    Flight Keeper - new developer

    Have you been able to communicate with Thomas at all? I still use FSFK with P3Dv4 and it's becoming very dated and needs some serious attention. I'm kinda peeved at Thomas for just abandoning it without any course for us dedicated customers. Some, like myself, have over 10 years worth of FSFK logs and now they're basically worthless.
  2. jordanal

    Any word on PFPX update?

    Ditto - I would really like to see the adult passenger weights bug fix released, sooner rather than later!
  3. jordanal

    Passenger Weight Bug

    I addition, I later figured out, after you send the PFPX plan with Children only values to TopCat, you must change the number of people in TopCat back to adults. So I set the weights preferences of children in PFPX and adults in Topcat the same (PMDG aircraft use 175 or 195 lbs). The reason you have to do this children/adults switch is the stupid preference for Children weight in Topcat won't go up to 175/195 lbs; it's a fix-value field. So in PFPX I set each plan using 'Children' only value (no adults or infants). After exporting to TopCat and switch to it, I 'CUT' the children value and 'Paste' it in the Adults field, and set Children back to 0. The weight-math per person (175 or 195 lbs) then works out perfectly in PFPX and TopCat. Jeee…. I sure wish they would fix this stupid bug!
  4. jordanal

    Passenger Weight Bug

    I figured out today, to only use the "Children" box for passengers - no adults or infant values. Then the weights entered in the "Preferences" section is honored correctly. The bug is in the "Adults" value field....
  5. jordanal

    PFPX and Lbs.

    I noticed this issue around the time 1.28 came out. You have to make flight "TYPE" set to 'General', then the weights will once again be honored and exported properly to TOPCAT. The devs messed-up the 'Scheduled' and 'Non-Scheduled' flight 'TYPES' respecting the weights set in the Options.
  6. ICAO: KLGB NAME: Long Beach Airport (Daugherty Field) v4 TYPE: Freeware FS: FSX DESIGNER: SunskyJet - Shehryar (Shez) Ansari LINK: Original Preview Discussion:
  7. ICAO: KCLT NAME: Charlotte Intl 2013 v2 TYPE: Payware FS: FS9 & (FSX - Just Released) DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK: AES 2.31
  8. ICAO: TJSJ NAME: San Juan Luis Munoz Marin Airport, Puerto Rico SP1 Update TYPE: Payware FS: FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK:
  9. ICAO: KCVG NAME: Cincinnati Northern Kentucky Intl SP1 Update TYPE: Payware FS: FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK: http://www.imaginesi...vgupdates01.htm
  10. ICAO: KSJC NAME: San Jose Intl SP1 Update TYPE: Payware FS: FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK: AES 2.00, Update don't effect AES here
  11. ICAO: KCLT NAME: Charlotte Intl SP1 Update TYPE: Payware FS: FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK: AES 2.31
  12. ICAO: KIAD Name: Washington Dulles Intl v2 SP1 Type: Payware - Free SP1 Update, Including new AFCAD FS: FSX Designer: ImagineSim Link: AES 1.99, Update don't effect AES here
  13. ICAO: KATL NAME: Atlanta Heartsfield Intl 2012 v3 TYPE: Payware FS: FS9/FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim Link: AES 2.26
  14. V2 of the Armi Project (VTBS) was just released. An AES upgrade from v1 to v2 for both FSX and FS9 would be great. ICAO: VTBS NAME: SUVARNABHUMI INTL TYPE: Payware - v2 is free upgrade from SimMarket. FS: FS9 & FSX DESIGNER: Armi Project LINK: http://secure.simmar...-intl-fsx.phtml AES 2.09, Version 2012 compatible to 2010 Version regarding AES
  15. Ah, that explains it - thanks oliver. I advised my fellow NGX drivers accordingly here: I look forward to the selection enahancement as well.