• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

19 Good

About jordanal

  • Rank
    Flight Student - Airwork
  1. PFPX and Lbs.

    I noticed this issue around the time 1.28 came out. You have to make flight "TYPE" set to 'General', then the weights will once again be honored and exported properly to TOPCAT. The devs messed-up the 'Scheduled' and 'Non-Scheduled' flight 'TYPES' respecting the weights set in the Options.
  2. Can't send data TOPCAT

    Yup, I am now getting this exact same problem using 1.26. That is the latest version as far as I know...
  3. ICAO: KLGB NAME: Long Beach Airport (Daugherty Field) v4 TYPE: Freeware FS: FSX DESIGNER: SunskyJet - Shehryar (Shez) Ansari LINK: Original Preview Discussion:
  4. ICAO: KCLT NAME: Charlotte Intl 2013 v2 TYPE: Payware FS: FS9 & (FSX - Just Released) DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK: AES 2.31
  5. ICAO: TJSJ NAME: San Juan Luis Munoz Marin Airport, Puerto Rico SP1 Update TYPE: Payware FS: FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK:
  6. ICAO: KCVG NAME: Cincinnati Northern Kentucky Intl SP1 Update TYPE: Payware FS: FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK: http://www.imaginesi...vgupdates01.htm
  7. ICAO: KSJC NAME: San Jose Intl SP1 Update TYPE: Payware FS: FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK: AES 2.00, Update don't effect AES here
  8. ICAO: KCLT NAME: Charlotte Intl SP1 Update TYPE: Payware FS: FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim LINK: AES 2.31
  9. ICAO: KIAD Name: Washington Dulles Intl v2 SP1 Type: Payware - Free SP1 Update, Including new AFCAD FS: FSX Designer: ImagineSim Link: AES 1.99, Update don't effect AES here
  10. ICAO: KATL NAME: Atlanta Heartsfield Intl 2012 v3 TYPE: Payware FS: FS9/FSX DESIGNER: ImagineSim Link: AES 2.26
  11. V2 of the Armi Project (VTBS) was just released. An AES upgrade from v1 to v2 for both FSX and FS9 would be great. ICAO: VTBS NAME: SUVARNABHUMI INTL TYPE: Payware - v2 is free upgrade from SimMarket. FS: FS9 & FSX DESIGNER: Armi Project LINK: http://secure.simmar...-intl-fsx.phtml AES 2.09, Version 2012 compatible to 2010 Version regarding AES
  12. Ah, that explains it - thanks oliver. I advised my fellow NGX drivers accordingly here: I look forward to the selection enahancement as well.
  13. BUMP - Oliver, I just wondered if you read my post above. Thanks.
  14. Has the height that determins the type of cargo loader used been changed in AES 2.20? For my PMDG NGX aircraft, I had 1.7 for the front and 2.0 for rear cargo holds and both would use the belt-type loader. Since AES 2.20, the rear (2.0) has been using the skid-type cargo loader, which is super unrealistic for the 737. In comparison, the Level-D 763 cargo holds I have set 2.35 and I would still like to see belt-loaders even with the 763. Now my PMDG 747 has the cargo holds at 3.1 and the skid-loader might be appropriate on the Queen. Can you please change the height that determines when the skid-type cargo loader used to 2.5 or greater? Thanks!
  15. For future reference - see my post on the AVSIM forum for good intelliscene.cfg entries for the PMDG 737-800/900 NGX settings.