harpsi

member
  • Content Count

    334
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About harpsi

  • Rank
    Gliderpilot

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. By the way, to run P3D fast, is there any advantage from the new M.2 HDs?
  2. So, if with your "normal" PC you already can fly very good, with a high-end PC you can do a lot more. But what are the things you can do more with Professional P3D version? I was reading something about it, but I didn't understand quite well the difference between both versions.
  3. I am happy with 25-30. The human eye cannot "distinguish" more fps after a certain number. I think even a lower number. I have read something like 17?
  4. Indeed that's what I said: probably no hardware is ready for that... the same as 15 years ago. Computers are better but stuff is also more detailed and complex.
  5. Well, that I know but of course I am taking in account that those settings we always speak are set to 100 % or very near. That's what I am talking about when we discuss fps. If I use default scenery I know that I can achive a lot of fps, but if I use an ORBX or Aerosoft scenery I expect to use all settings at 100 % or near. It's the same discussion of 10-15 years ago: is there any hardware combination that can run P3Dv4 with all sliders set to 100 %, with detailed sceneries (ORBX, FlyTampa, Aerosoft), clouds (REX), AI aircrafts, complex aircraft (FS Labs, PMDG) and so on? I suspect that maybe the answer is again: No.
  6. Thanks. The problem is when you add everything together. We were discussing this issue about framerates and stutters like 15, 10, 5 years ago... I hope that with this system and everything together doesn't give me problems at least to run it about 30 fps.
  7. Hi all, I am almost out of FS for 1-2 years and I want to come back. I have several questions about hardware and software: a) Software: 1. FSX or P3Dv4? 2. P3Dv4 professional or academic? (I just want to do what I did with FSX) b) Hardware: 1. Processor: i7 7800X LGA2066 3,5-4,0 GHz, i7 8700K LGA1151 3.7-4.7 GHz 12M, or a different and better one? Overclocking is really necessary with such high-end CPUs? 2. Motherboard: MSI X299 GAMING PRO CARBON AC LGA2066 8DDR4 ST6RD GBLAN, ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING LGA1151 USB 3.1 M.2, or a different and better one? 3. Videocard: ASUS NVIDIA GTX 1080TI ROG STRIX 11GB GDDR5X PCIE3, GIGABYTE NVIDIA GTX 1080TI WATERFORCE XTREME AORUS 11, MSI NVIDIA GTX 1080TI GAMING X 11GB GDDR5X PCIE3, or a different and better one? 4. RAM: 16GB DDR4 4266 2X288 DIMM CL19 1.2V GSKILL TRIDENT Z? One needed or two of these which makes 32GB in total? Any different suggestions? 5. HD: MZ-V7E500BW - M.2 PCIE X4 2280 SAMSUNG 970 EVO 500GB 3500/2500MB to run Windows 10 at 64 bits, SAMSUNG SSD 1TB SATA Serie 850 EVO - mSATA to run FSX/P3D, or any other sugestions? 6. Cooler: which one? Watercooling is probably better? One thing that I notice reading every forum is: we are still talking about simulators running at 20 or 25 fps with all stuff like Aerosoft, FlyTampa, ORBX, detailed clouds, PMDG 777 or FSLabs 320, AI aicrafts at 75 % or 100 %, scenery details at 100 % and so on. Is this machine good to run one of those simulators at 30 fps at least and without stutters? Thanks, harpsi
  8. harpsi

    SODE issues

    Hi Sorry, this is a big misconfuse. If you want to install Svolvaer + ORBX Global Vector + ORBX Global Base + ORBX FTX Norway Region, what do we need to do in terms of scenery order and other issues like SODE? Tks. harpsi
  9. harpsi

    EGLC AI

    It solved if I disable EGLC airport from VFR scenery. Tks. harpsi
  10. harpsi

    EGLC AI

    I already did that and I still have the traffic there... harpsi
  11. harpsi

    EGLC AI

    Hi Is there a way to take the AI aircrafts from EGLC out? I have no AI traffic packages installed which means that those aircrafts are coming from the scenery itself... Tks harpsi
  12. harpsi

    Stavanger 1.01

    Hi I tried to download version 1.01 from Stavanger but the zip file still shows version 1.00. Is it possible to correct this issue? Thanks. harpsi
  13. harpsi

    PAKT ORBX

    Hi Is it possible to have PAKT from ORBX also modelled? I know that this airport has a lot of limitations because of all de level degrees of altitude, but at least a pushback car from gate 1 and 2 and 1 fuel car... Passengers modeling maybe not needed. Due to the limitations the pushback car would be fair enough harpsi
  14. Latest libraries? harpsi