• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by nealmac

  1. That's all well and good, but if you own the busses, you might want to create a flight plan for those as well. I understand, it's a workaround, but a very minor update is all that's needed for this.
  2. Yeah it's working really well for me, but as Kendall said, the export options really need updating. We've had so many new aircraft in the last 12 months and it would be nice if we could have an update that would let us export for these aircraft.
  3. There has been no update to PFPX for a long long time now. That's why there's no option for exporting to the CRJ. However, the CRJ is a short range jet so usually, adding the flight plan to the FMC by keying it in manually doesn't take too long.
  4. I just gave you an upvote. I agree. I don't like the system either, as too many people abuse it. My philosophy is, if you don't like a post, just keep scrolling. I've never given a single downvote on these forums. A system with only upvotes works well on other forums.
  5. September 6th is fine by me. It comes after my pay day so it's all good.
  6. nealmac

    Aerosoft A330 Professional Preview

    You seem to be contradicting yourself? You say you're disappointed that their goal isn't about making other variants. Then you say you're NOT disappointed with the outright refusal to make variants. Also, the only refusal I've seen is regards the NEO, and considering they don't have access to the required information that's fairly understandable. Regarding other variants, Aerosoft seem to have left this door open.
  7. nealmac

    Request an Train/Bus/Airport/Aircraft/Tool thread

    I second a motion for a 64 bit version of Dublin. It's my local airport and I really missing flying in/out of it.
  8. nealmac

    SP1 closes the 32 bit development

    Downvoting me for speaking the truth? For speaking facts? Real classy, Dirk.
  9. nealmac

    SP1 closes the 32 bit development

    This is a really odd comment. For a kick off, the product will still work in FSX. So what's the problem? It's not like they are trying to take it off you. 64 bit is the future. Get used to it. From reading your post, I'm reading it, you come across as "jealous". It seems that you want all the enhancements that are only possible for a 64 bit platform and your 13 year old 32 bit platform. Look at it this way: Microsoft stopped mainstream support for windows 7 over 3 years ago, and all extended support will cease in 2020. It's called moving with the times. Would you expect Microsoft to still be supporting Windows XP? Of course you wouldn't. Also, would you expect developers to create software with Windows XP in mind? Again, of course you wouldn't. This is how life works. We move forward, and sometimes we pay money to do so. It's a fact of life.
  10. No it's not compatible. The new 64bit version of the A318/319 was released earlier this week. And the A320/321 will be released in the next 4-5 weeks.
  11. Adding an EFB section would be amazing, although if that happened, I would imagine we'd have to pay for it. Although I do like the idea of an all-in-one app. As for the moving map, PFPX already has one of these.
  12. nealmac

    Auto pilot disconnect

    As pedroquitas1 said above, it's supposed to do that. The bigger question is, why would you be moving the joystick when the autopilot is controlling the plane?
  13. I tried manually installing NavDataPro into the CJ2 but it kept crashing my sim every time I loaded it up. It seems it needs Navigraph.
  14. Just to translate for everyone: Well of course there will be wingflex and that wingflex, assuming you want wingflex, you could very well say that this will be the best wingflex ever modeled.
  15. I believe you could be right. I never thought of that before. It certainly makes sense. For me it's always a fairly brief pause, so I never had a problem with it.
  16. nealmac

    Aircraft Pushback (Done manually!)

    "all engines clear for sta.....NOOOO! NOOO! CORRECTION! NOT CLEAR! I REPEAT NOT CLEAR!"
  17. Yeah I get this too. But every few seconds? Nope. Every few minutes maybe. And considering I only need PFPX for 5 to 10 minutes to create a flight plan, I have learned to live with the issue. Certainly not a show stopper for me.
  18. Actually, if you look further down the page, you'll see that I made a similar thread, and the answer was given quite quickly.
  19. PFPX is working really well for me too. However, I'm still interested in an update, because I have the CRJ since it was released last year, and we STILL can't export a flight plan format for it.
  20. Nice route. I might try this myself some day.
  21. I'll take a stab at Beauvais, LFOB.
  22. nealmac


    Is it just me or have the "Club" forums been removed?
  23. Hi all. Looking forward to getting this tour underway. I enjoyed the RTW tour, so this one should be just as much fun. Mathijs said that using different aircraft is encouraged, so in that case I'll be using the PMDG 737, the Aerosoft CRJ 700 and the Aerosoft Airbus A320 (if it's released). I've also recently purchased Carenado's Phenom 100 business jet, so I hope to try and learn how to fly it if I have time. I'm using P3Dv4, so you have to excuse me for using a lot of default airports. I will try and purchase some more airports as they become available. I've recently become a single man so I have a little bit more money to spend than usual lol. I'd probably be better off saving up for a new PC, but I'm rubbish at saving. I'll be using Active Sky for P3Dv4 for real world weather, and I'll be using PFPX for flight planning.