• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by walterg74

  1. Falcon and P3D v4

    Hi all, while looking at the "p3d v4 ready" post, I saw this: The F-16 Fighting Falcon has moved to the default simulator and will not be provided as a P3d V4 add-ons from us. We will provide the liveries and models that do not make it into the simulator. In the release candidate the manual for the F-16 is missing. You will find it as an attachment to this post. Does this mean that the F-16 included in P3D v4 is the Aerosoft one..? (Asking due to the comment, and that Aerosoft will provide liveries, but on the P3D site, in the "included aircraft" page it doesn't mention Aerosoft as the provider of the aircraft).
  2. Lol yeah that’s not how the law (or society works). If you put malware in my machine, you are the one doing the violation. And also this is not about “first or second”. You break the law, you pay, period. (And fyi, just in case you don’t know, just logging on to a system without permission is against the law and punishable with prision currently).
  3. Because it’s a violation of privacy? Because it’s unethical? Because it is ILLEGAL?
  4. I know certain company used it. I meant I hoped it was a joke that he suggested Aerosoft do the same...
  5. Are you sure it’s not more like 84.8536%..?
  6. I really hope that was a joke... (although a terrible one...)
  7. Maybe it was a general statement, or they meant on the real thing..?
  8. Can someone from the team explain to those of us ignorant of how this is made, how it is the same model as it has been said, but the pics shown so far show it to be so much more beautiful?
  9. Will they be configurable? Meaning can I opt to *not* have them displayed..?
  10. Not really I cannot say I have been following since that long. I guess ppl at the time never thought they would have to wait so long
  11. 100% right. (Just like all communities, and people in general)
  12. I share these thoughts.... I would rather they focus on getting the plane first, and maybe things like this later if you REALLY want to have it.... When you take a flight, first they make sure to get you up in the air. The meal comes later...
  13. I don’t think so, but I believe in those cases the cabin air will be “rarified”...
  14. <—- I guess this is the closest to the facepalm we will get...
  15. Have you even read the post STICKIED at the top of EVERY page..? Do you undersrand the difference between an update and an (almost) complete new product? everything has been explained by the devs and is on the top of every page to easily find and read. If you don’t like it that is your right, but you can either wait patiently, or go fly something else like you say, but not complain and whine like a little boy, specially when you have not even taken the time to read what was explained numerous times. There is nothing “mysterious” about this. In fact it is quite the oposite. I have not seen any dev share as much and as frequently as Arerosoft is doing (others like for example pmdg pretty much insult you when you ask about progress). It’s not magic, it takes time...
  16. Haven’t contradicted anything actually. Without the update to 4.2, Aerosoft would’ve been stopped.
  17. Where I can I get your chill pills? You have patience unheard of sir!
  18. Here is my rude post of the day: can you read?
  19. I don’t think LM updates delays any developer, the situation is quite the OPPOSITE... thanks to them fixing bugs in 4.1 and releasing 4.2 is that aerosoft could continuing moving forward with the airbuses...
  20. I never said they were compatible with each other, I said that all major games support both platforms. There was never a consumer solution from Nintendo, and I hope by that you’re not referring to the failed virtual boy which is by no means a virtual reality device… (Honestly I don’t know if that was a joke or what… )
  21. There’s no “competing with each other”, from the user’s perspective 99% of all games work with either of the main two platforms. Not sure what “every couple of years” you are talking about. There has never been a real consumer VR solution before the Oculus and HTC Vive came along. They have been here for a while, and not going anywhere... Also regarding expensive? I could accept that statement from “average joe” with an average PC, but flight simmers who due to the demand flight sims have *usually* have very strong PCs, no, not really...
  22. Do you mean dynamic lights? If so besides the fact that in theory they have improved the performance with the last update, I think you can set that on or off from the simulator itself it doesn’t matter if the aircraft supports them, if you have them off in the simulator you’re not using them. At least I think that’s how it works, I may be wrong…
  23. If you cannot handle the vomit, don’t get kn the roller coaster