Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/05/17 in all areas

  1. 5 points
    No, EIS1 versions will not be modeled. It is not just the displays bit also how the information is displayed. Next to that there are some other differences and AS choose to model current models and not go for the old stuff.
  2. 3 points
    The decision to charge a second, full price for PMDG aircraft between FSX and P3D was made by PMDG, not Aerosoft. Even though you made the error, this is FAR MORE than Aerosoft not having the ability to verify that you're not using the product in both FSX and P3D - people do (I'm one of them). You see, Aerosoft has to pay for each Serial Number they get from the original developer, and since serial numbers can't be re-used what you're really asking for is Aerosoft to pay for the price of this aircraft (serial number) because you selected the wrong product and then purchased it. I'm not blaming you for the mistake, we all make them. Maybe you haven't really thought this matter though from all sides, and you don't realize that what you're really asking for is for someone else to pay for your mistake. Brother, if you are aware of this and that is what you're trying to do, then that is WAYYYYYY UNCOOL of you. Terribly so. I really hope that's not the case. Best wishes.
  3. 3 points
    Is it the intention to publish a "change log" regarding the new 2018 A320 family v the current version?. This may be useful to help decide if to buy the new version, or stick with the current one. Regards.
  4. 2 points
    Good article. https://www.howtogeek.com/323523/why-does-every-pc-game-install-its-own-copy-of-directx/
  5. 2 points
    It must be mentioned that none of these troubleshooting steps had been required for any preceding version of the CRJ, including version And that no other addon plane requires these steps, either. Whatever has crept into the code of version 1.0.1 has to be identified and corrected.
  6. 2 points
    I have had the same problem loading RNAV Z for 28L at KMRY. After selecting the arrival and SNS transition and pressing EXEC on the FMC, P3D just freezes for a solid minute or two before just closing without generating an error report. When I try to close the client after the freeze, it will actually make an error report: I can't tell whether it's a problem with the CRJ or not though because I haven't been able to replicate with other aircraft because I jumped to a clean install a few hours after the problem arose. I also can't tell yet if it's a possible problem with the AIRAC data. I updated to the newest version of the CRJ this weekend as well as updated the AIRAC, and I never had this problem with the old AIRAC or version of the CRJ. Edit: The problem did persist after a clean install of only P3d v4 and the CRJ. I am installing everything again now to see if I can replicate the error with other aircraft.
  7. 2 points
    AES is currently in complete re-developed to overcome severe compatibility issues (for any other platform than FSX) with a used but no longer supported module. The development is going on smoothly, but there is still a long way to go. No time frame has been given at all at this moment.
  8. 1 point
    Mega Airport Singapore X (by Antti Haka), It's still some way off but we thought it would be nice to share some first images!
  9. 1 point
    Hello, I will try to fly the route with a Cirrus SR20 (vFlyteAir) with my own livery D-ESRT. I will use the X-Plane 11. The Cirrus is a fine aircraft, can fly in icing conditions and for an emergency situation the Cirrus has an Airframe Parachute System (CAPS). This is very reassuring... I will prepare the Cirrus with additional fuel tanks. This is possible for about 350 lbs ( about 56 GAL Fuel). The standard max. Fuel weight is 54 Gal. So I can fly nonstop for about 1300 nm (65% Power) or 1500 nm (55% power). I will simulate the additionally tanks and the fuel flow manually during the flight with the Cirrus Fuel and Weight menu (see picture). I will use the sliders for the left and right rear pax sliders (black Arrows) and the sliders for the left and right tanks of the Cirrus (red arrows). So all over the flighttime the weight of the aircraft and the CG will be correct. For the pacific route (Yokohama - San Francisco) i think, I will use the Kamtschatka - Aleutian Island - Alaska - Westcost of Canada route .... But at first i have to fly from EDHM (my home airfield) to Hamburg for assembling the additionally tanks ... And then I will make some little flights for testing the fuel tanks and the start- and landing distance with 108 Gal Fuel on board. Greets Heinz
  10. 1 point
    We have changed our policy regarding the orders of Aerosoft products that were bought at the now closed Simplanet shop. This change is only for products were Aerosoft is the publisher (or of course the developer). This is the procedure to move that order to our shop: Contact us at support@aerosoft.com and provide us proof of purchase, we need to be 100% sure you did indeed bought the product We will reply with instructions on how to create an order in our shop that will not be charged (a so called 'press order'). Do not forget to make a comment with the order referring to the ticket created at support@aerosoft.com! Orders without comments are deleted. We will then manually release that order so you can download it. Please allow us some time to handle it, it is a rather time consuming process and we can only do a certain amount a day.
  11. 1 point
    Everytime, i want to load the RNAV Arrival on RWY 27 at LXGB the CRJ is freezing and the p3d crash. With other planes i don't have this problem.
  12. 1 point
    I understand, and believe me we want you flying her too! We're optimistic that you will be! Best wishes.
  13. 1 point
    I went back and checked, and I did find that I'm getting a significant drop in fps in generally. I'm still able to maintain an average of 30fps with VSYNC On, Unlimited frames in P3DV4. It is VERY important to note that frame rates in V4 are ENTIRELY different than how the work in prevision version of P3D or FSX. As such, locking frame rates in generally I'll advised... try what I'm using above. I'm on the road right now, but I'll try to get back on and explain the difference in how frames work between the sims.
  14. 1 point
  15. 1 point
    You did nothing wrong, I did something wrong, not everybody was informed. I have replied to your email. Sorry for the mishap.
  16. 1 point
    Because we believe this topic has been answered we have closed it. If you have any more questions feel free to open a new topic.
  17. 1 point
    Yes, they all will have an additional antenna, but if I am correctly informed they will be much smaller than what is now used.
  18. 1 point
    Thanks for the additional info. To be honest I've not done much with the 700, and tomorrow is my last day home until the following Monday so I doubt I'd have a chance to fly it. I'm sure that Hans or someone else will chime in here. Best wishes.
  19. 1 point
    SimConnect version 10.0.60905.0 is the original version of SimConnect that came with the original FSX (before Service Pack 2, and before FSX Acceleration. Everyone should be running FSX:SP2, FSX Acceleration, or FSX Steam (FSX:SE), which is to say that there is absolutely no reason to be running a version of FSX prior to FSX:SP2. General, but relevant information: Note that FSX:SE is in reality FSX Acceleration that has been updated by DoveTail Games, thus it is the most updated version of FSX. FSX:SE can often be found on sale via Steam for $5, so there is really no reason that everyone shouldn't be running this version if they choose to stay with FSX. It's better, faster, and much more stable than any previous version of FSX. Period. SimConnect Version 10.0.61259.0 is for FSX:SP2 and/or Acceleration. Note please that while Service Pack 2 must be manually installed for FSX (Not FSX:SE), Service Pack 2 is automatically included/installed with FSX Acceleration. FSX Steam uses a slightly updated version of SimConnect. The FSX:SE version number is 10.0.62608.0. So... FSX: 10.0.60905.0 FSX SP1: 10.0.61242.0 FSX SP2 & Acceleration: 10.0.61259.0 FSX:SE: 10.0.62608.0 You get another version then it's either for ESP (base program for FSX, P3D, FSW) or P3D. QUESTIONS & ANSWERS: 1. Are there other versions of SimConnect? Yes, there are versions for ESP (the software from which FSX, P3D and FSW come from), but they are not required for FSX. 2. Can I have more than one version of SimConnect? Absolutely, we do this all the time with P3D in order to be able to run legacy software or software developed for a particular version of SimConnect in the Simulator. 3. Why are there so many versions of SimConnect? Well, updates for one thing. Programmers will create software to interface with a particular version of SimConnect, but usually will use the latest version applicable to the simulator their software is being run on. These days developers should always tell us which version of SimConnect for P3D and for that matter which version of C++ Redistributables their software was create with (FSX and P3D), though I know of none who do. Also... what are some of the things SimConnect does? See: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc526983.aspx 4. How do I know which version(s) of SimConnect I have installed in my simulator? If you have just one Simulator installed (FSX, FSX:SE, P3D) you can open the Windows Programs and Features in the Windows Control Panel and look for Microsoft SimConnect in the programs list. It becomes a little more complicated if you have more than one Simulator installed because Programs and Features simply tells you which versions of SimConnect are installed, but not which simulators they are installed for. To figure out which versions are installed for which simulators you will have to do a lot of digging, sometimes in areas that are pretty foreign to most non-Windows Technicians, so it's better and faster just to reinstall the versions of SimConnect you need. 5. Can I uninstall SimConnect. You can do so manually by removing folders and files if you know where to look, but there is a 99% change that doing so will mean you having to reinstall the simulator. You shouldn't do it. 6. Can I reinstall SimConnect over an existing version? Absolutely, this is how it should be done. Ensure that the Windows User Account Control slider is set to minimum (all the way down), your computer security is disabled and if possible you should right click the install file and run the installer "As Administrator". 7. What if I'm getting an error regarding an older version of SimConnect? Reinstall it, and then check to see that you have the latest version of SimConnect applicable to your simulator installed. You can always reinstall it if you have any doubts. 8. Where can I get / download SimConnect for FSX? CLICK HERE for the FSX versions. For the FSX:SE version you can find all three versions by opening up your main FSX:SE folder and then going to: SDK\Core Utilities Kit\SimConnect SDK\LegacyInterfaces. 8. I've done all the above and still having problems, what can/should I do? Reinstall your simulator. Nobody likes to do this (especially if you have complex installations and addon software a mile long like I do), but reinstalling your simulator will actually save save you a great deal of time when compared to troubleshooting. The reason is that SimConnect is tied to almost everythiing in the simulator, and it's very, very complex. Re installation are not nearly as time consuming as they used to be, and if you're running a disk version of FSX and you are ready to take my advice and update to FSX:SE then your install will not only be MUCH faster (if you have a decent Internet Connection) it will handle the install for you... you can just walk away and come back in 45 minutes to an hour and it will all be done for you. Well, I think that covers all the bases, but if you have a question not answered above then please let me know. I hope this has been helpful to you. My very best wishes.
  20. 1 point
    Certainly Neal, I'll tidy up my list. It's basically FSX plus Playsim airports of UK and Ireland, including Channel Islands, Scilly, Isle of Man etc. Another thing I did was fly a Beaver seaplane around the coastline, investigating all the rivers and islands... How the long winter evenings fly past
  21. 1 point
    *Possible Workaround* until it's checked. I too on occasion have had this issue. This restored "Dave's" functionality for me, and I hope it helps for some of you guys. After chocks and ground power buttons stop working: * Go to Options page on Dave * Select the Enable button under Help Messages * Select the Disable button under Help Messages * Press Home button and then press Ground Services / Maintenance button * Now check to see if chocks and ground power buttons work again. (Hopefully functionality is restored for you) This has worked for me...good luck!
  22. 1 point
    Wow that's bright. Maybe it works with FlusiFix. http://www.wolfgang-picheta.de/ Achso, kann ja auch Deutsch sprechen Probier es mal mit diesem Tool. Dort kann man die Lichter von den Runways und Taxiways einstellen. Wenn es funktioniert hat, dann lass es mich wissen. Schönen Abend. RJ100 Swiss
  23. 1 point
    To further make the point, 2018 model year cars have already been released on the market, and it's barely September.
  24. 1 point
    With the greatest of respect, I suffer from short term memory problems and confusion due to pain meds affecting the brain and I still find things without too much effort in these posts. With respect to the 2016 date in the first post that should remain, and IMHO as I am not a Mod or owner, so should any posts mentioning it. The current dates, if any become available, are in the current posts. Whilst I do not necessarily agree with the mix of A320 and A330 in the same thread it has happened and it is still possible to work my way through and both find what I want, and separate one plane type from the other. Their are often valid reasons to do these things, the Mods and/or Staff decide them and we have to just learn to adapt. It really isn't that difficult once you try.
  25. 1 point
    Thanks Tom, I moved from FSX to P3Dv3 6 months ago and to v4 roughly 2 weeks ago. The only thing I really miss from FSX is AES. GSX works, but I will always prefer AES. I really look forward to the day where AES will work in P3Dv4
  26. 1 point
    What you asked for in the post that Otto replied to with the picture might not require something this massive, but his point is, the computational power and storage needed to fulfill your request is well in excess of pretty much anyone's desktop computer these days or even several years from now. In short, utterly impractical for quite some time in the future.
  27. 1 point
    In my opinion it's extremely hard to find information in this huge thread. I would like to suggest to make it more user friendly maybe splitting the thread in one for the A330 and one for the A320 Family with some updated info on the first page.
  28. 1 point
    "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." A Google/Bing search is an essential skill these days.
  29. 1 point
    To say simply "yes" or "no" would have required me to do the research myself - for you. Instead of waiting for an answer here in the forum it would have been actually quicker if you would have just looked it up yourself. THAT is the fasted way, nothing else is. You are welcome.
  30. 1 point

    Version 1.0.1


  31. 1 point
    First of all I would like to make it perfectly clear that NOWHERE in any of my last posts did I state that I wished to or was removing ALL of my uploads here . I also see no reason to contact any Aerosoft staff via email ( behind closed doors ) as I personally have nothing to hide or have any ulterior motives for any decisions that I may have to make , now or in the future . I do NOT have a " hidden agenda " and have been nothing but open and honest in the 7 years that I have been active here . That I now discover that several uploads have been removed ( not ALL as stated ) without being told exactly what has been removed is something that I just cannot understand , having just spent several days uploading , why would i now be removing them ? What does bother me though is the petty behaviour of some forum members regarding " reputation points " as witnessed by myself in the Screenshots forum . On the competition page someone decide for whatever reason to downvote a screenshot , that I chose to comment on that ( and upvoted so the total was 0 ) can hardly be a bad thing , that I have now been downvoted at least twice ( at the time of posting ) just proves what I posted earlier ... " The whole reputation points system is open to abuse as staff here know , this happens everywhere , not just here . Why do you think that AVSIM disabled the downvote button ? I never asked for a reputation , that is down to other forum members and certainly not the reason I upload and post here . " If someone has a problem with anything I post at least have the courtesy to explain why to me personally instead of hiding behind your keyboard .
  32. 1 point
    I eventually discovered that only my American liveries were removed from the server , not ALL liveries as stated in my " intellectual property " topic . As I wrote in the first post above , NOWHERE in any of my other posts did I ask for any liveries to be removed at all and I had no intention ( at the time ) to do so . However , receiving 5 downvotes in my original post for stating this is proof enough of the toxic atmosphere here , also no-one apparently disagreed with the downvotes either and THAT is the reason that I reversed my original decision . Having recently made a list so that I was able to keep track of which airlines ( and registrations ) I had painted , I can only say thank you to the 21000+ people who have downloaded these liveries . That Aerosoft are planning to no longer include the N911UY livery in the next A3XX upgrade is understandable but why also include a disclaimer that the livery was created by ... when it is no longer there ? I fail to see the logic in that . My " mistake " was simply expecting my name ( and Detcord's ) to be included in the manual as the " creators " of N911UY without any further expectations . For those who seem to think that I only painted Airbusses to receive " free " products , I can only say that I obviously wasn't very good at doing that in the 7 years that I have been active here , nor have I ever asked for anything . In all openness , I did receive 2 products in October 2014 after the complaints that were made that the Painters Forum was closed ( and later re-opened ) . I EXPECT that ALL of my uploads will be removed within the next 24 hours as I am unable to do so myself . I find it ridiculous that uploads have been removed without asking but when I DO ask , that it does not happen .
  33. 1 point
    It is now abundantly clear that anything I do or say here is going to be downvoted by a small group of faceless " keyboard warriors " who have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt the comment I made above . As I have no idea who these " keyboard warriors " are I have no way to thank them personally for helping me with the following decision . With this in mind I am now asking ( demanding ) that ALL of my uploads here on the server be removed with immediate effect ( or be allowed to do so myself ) . Sorry to other members but I would not tolerate this from a work colleague , so have no reason to do so here . So CONGRATULATIONS !! You win . I have no intention of closing my account here as I have several Aerosoft products in my possession that will ( possibly ) require updates in the future .
  34. 1 point
    I'm certainly not the only one, Mathijs. John, Airmax and I'm sure a few others. Of course you'd have to judge said work on an individual basis. I simply find it rather disconcerting that you feel I was over due yet I had to point it out publicly to garner a response. Seems rather disingenuous, no offense. However, that's your and Aerosoft's prerogative. It's your company, you're free to do things as you wish. No ill will. I'm past the point disconcertment, anger and the feeling of being unappreciated while helping to sell and extend your products via likes of liveries and other content. People that do things like this are the backbone of your community, and to toss them aside, to not show a semblance of gratitude is just the epitome of little, a nonchalant attitude of who cares. With all due respect, please don't contact me. I'll pull my content as soon as a secondary option becomes available.
  35. 1 point
    Really? That's news to me. Guess all the free content I and others have contributed to your products over the years isn't worth much. At least I know there's a distinction now.
  36. 1 point
    Only up to 290 in the climb? Never done a CDO I see Disclaimer: 900 only here. I would add that while SPD mode can be smooth, it's seems to work better at lower speeds. I generally use it up to 250kts, then will use VS afterwards. Some random numbers I'll throw out there. When climbing through 10,000 and wanting to accelerate to 290, put the airplane into VS and dial in 1000FPM. If you're light, once you reach 290, 16-1700FPM should hold it. If you're heavy, 1500FPM might work. By the time you need to transition to .74 Mach, you'll probably be 1000FPM or less. Add 300FPM to whatever your climb rate was holding 290kts and it should hold .74. Ballpark numbers all around there and you'll need to monitor them. Obviously affected by ISA too. Fun tidbit worth adding, the CRJ wing likes to go fast. You'll climb far quicker doing 290kts than 250. Somedays 320kts/.77mach seems like it gets you altitude even quicker also. While descending, remember to the 11 at 11 rule. Basically hit 11,000ft at idle power, 290kts, at 1100FPM, and you'll be 250kts at 10,000 nearly every time. We never use SPD mode above 10,000. Idle thrust Mach .77 descent out of FL340 is quite violent. We just use VS and the DIR INTC page of the FMS for our descents. If people are curious I'll write up exactly how we do that. It's kind of a weird guess and check combo done in unison with the snowflake. Descend via arrivals are fun
  37. 1 point

    Version 1.0.1


    Uncompressed DDS textures.
  38. 1 point
    ICAO: EDDL NAME: Dusseldorf Airport (DUS) TYPE: PAYWARE DESIGNER: Justsim FS: FSX LINK: http://secure.simmarket.com/justsim-duesseldorf-airport_eddl-fsx-p3d-(de_10990).phtml
  39. 1 point
    That's a shame. We need good quality vintage aircraft for X-Plane 11! Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk
  40. 1 point
    ICAO: LEBL NAME: BARCELONA EL PRAT TYPE: PAYWARE FS: FSX/P3D DESIGNER: LATINVFR LINK: http://secure.simmarket.com/latinvfr-barcelona-el-prat-lebl-fsx-p3d-(fr_10909).phtml
  41. 1 point
    ICAO: EDDH NAME: Hamburg Airport - Helmut Schmidt TYPE: Payware FS: FSX/P3D DESIGNER: JustSim LINK: http://secure.simmarket.com/justsim-hamburg-airport-helmut-schmidt-eddh-fsx-p3d-(de_10748).phtml
  42. 1 point
    today bought the scenery Mega Airport Prague. I have AES 2.43a, it does not appear the Cenario
  43. 1 point

    Version 1.0


    This ZIP-file contains repaints for the Aerosoft Airbus X A320 Extended CFM NEO package, in the colors of Pegasus Airlines TC-DCA (clean and dirt). ... if you are looking for more or other repaints then you can also look on my homepage http://simtexture.de!
  44. 1 point
  45. 1 point
  46. 1 point
  47. 1 point

    Version 1.0.0


    Two in one! N526VL Costa Rica and N524VL Itzali
  48. 1 point

    Version 1.00


    PFPX Aircraft Performance File Gates Learjet 25 EngineType=GE CJ-610 An attempt to get some LJ25 figures into PFPX. Source data came from the Learjet 25 Operating Handbook which is freely available. Expect rw values for the ISA and ISA+15 climb (300kts, M0.70), the M0.77 cruise and the recommended VMO/MMO/250 descent. Holding data is available too. Mind you, the handbook only offers cruise values up to FL470 since it's based on unmodified aircraft models. If your sim vehicle offers the modifications and the FL510 ceiling, go for it! (and get me the data) Drop me a PM if you have any suggestions or constantly fall out of the sky because your fuel ran out. INSTALLATION: Just copy this file to your C:\Users\Public\Documents\PFPX Data\AircraftTypes folder and start PFPX. You can now set up an aircraft profile using the template. Copyright: Nah, free for all
  49. 1 point

    Version V3


    Aerosoft Twin Otter Extended, Texture only. This is remake of my previous texture painting. Repaint by Hani Michal
  50. 1 point

    Version 1.0


    This ZIP - file contains repaints in the colors of Airbus A320 IAE volaris XA-VON (clean and dirt). These textures can be used for the Airbus X and the Airbus X Extended! ... if you are looking for more or other repaints then you can also look on my homepage http://simtexture.de!