Global Air Traffic Control

56 topics in this forum

    • 1 reply
    • 523 views
    • 1 reply
    • 1827 views
    • 3 replies
    • 902 views
    • 2 replies
    • 2501 views
  1. Weiterentwicklung

    • 1 reply
    • 951 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1387 views
  2. Frage

    • 1 reply
    • 1285 views
  3. Verbesserungen

    • 0 replies
    • 1447 views
  4. YouTube?

    • 1 reply
    • 1974 views
  5. sprache

    • 1 reply
    • 1992 views
  6. global atc

    • 3 replies
    • 1912 views
  7. Fehlende Airlines

    • 1 reply
    • 2965 views
  8. Multiplayer

    • 0 replies
    • 1718 views
  9. Szenarien für den GATC

    • 0 replies
    • 1720 views
  10. Szenarien für den GATC

    • 0 replies
    • 2006 views
    • 3 replies
    • 2454 views
    • 1 reply
    • 3377 views
  11. Terrain heller

    • 4 replies
    • 2391 views
  12. Global ATC Installation

    • 3 replies
    • 2302 views
  13. GATC Sprachsteuerung?

    • 3 replies
    • 2243 views
  14. Abfluggeschwindigkeit ???

    • 1 reply
    • 2439 views
    • 4 replies
    • 2206 views
    • 3 replies
    • 2514 views
    • 2 replies
    • 2241 views
    • 1 reply
    • 2362 views
  • Posts

    • I do not subscribe to the hype about the other (Non Airbus) A320. I, like you (J VAN E) have all the options I need and I am not willing to pay a significantly more amount of money for things that I will not use. I do not think either plane competes against each other as they represent two different markets. I am anxiously waiting for the A318/19 as It's my go to plane. I have not even bothered to install my P3Dv4 yet as I cannot bring myself to give up the the A319. The one thing that cements my strong belief in the Aerosoft Airbus is that all the platforms (Except X Plane) are covered for the same price and that Aerosoft only charges for upgraded files. Anyway, back to waiting. I know it will be worth it. 
    • @datguythoSo the BARO is the minimum altitude, I always thought it was a backup altimeter reading, ok I will try that thank you
    • Yes. On the approach page enter the minimum at the BARO (in this case 396 feet) if its an altitude. You can look up the necessary minimums at the approach charts.
    • @Frank Docter Thank you for your reply, your solution sounds good however I do not mess around with the "incorrect minimum" so is this in the approach page with temperature, winds, baro etc?
    • Optimum Stepclimbs still doesn't work. (Optimize Altitude/FL - min.Time, - min.Fuel , -min.Cost also pointless)   again back to 1.28.8. (Opt.Climbs works in 1.28.8 but often with high discrepancy. Aircraft Template Profile is set correct.)