PFPX - Professional Flight Planner X

All your comments and support for PFPX

3326 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 387 views
  1. topcat speeds

    • 3 replies
    • 741 views
    • 0 replies
    • 428 views
  2. Problems with PFPX

    • 0 replies
    • 993 views
  3. Route export list

    • 0 replies
    • 403 views
    • 6 replies
    • 4678 views
    • 3 replies
    • 2569 views
  4. First Error

    • 4 replies
    • 431 views
  5. 814 Routes Outdated

    • 2 replies
    • 1088 views
    • 7 replies
    • 3571 views
    • 6 replies
    • 1584 views
    • 3 replies
    • 1428 views
  6. ISA Dev ...How?

    • 4 replies
    • 1164 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1213 views
  7. OFP as a PDF?

    • 7 replies
    • 3930 views
    • 3 replies
    • 429 views
  8. Print Error

    • 2 replies
    • 1022 views
    • 5 replies
    • 1016 views
  9. active sky and wx:online

    • 1 reply
    • 1125 views
    • 5 replies
    • 1310 views
  10. Export to FS2004

    • 0 replies
    • 321 views
    • 0 replies
    • 381 views
  11. Topcat

    • 15 replies
    • 2793 views
    • 1 reply
    • 351 views
  12. License Error

    • 1 reply
    • 410 views
  • Posts

    • The door and pax weight issues have been fixed and will be available in the next update.   I'm actually working on something like this, but didn't have the time to complete it yet. Bug fixing currently has a higher priority.
    • cool, wasent really too sure, it looks like it will be alot of fun for a glider, its a bit of an unexpected Christmas present from a friend, im still waiting on the an2 for fsx:se though, cant wait for that, thanks for the reply
    • thanks for the video. I'll fix the direct-to issue and also look into the LSK R1 issue.
    • Moin zusammen, habe just mit der C172 den EDDH Prof  besichtigt. Dabei ist mir aufgefallen, dass die Gate Bezeichnungen auf dem Beton höchst seltsam sind. In der Liste in P3D heißen die Gates 1, 2, 3, 4, usw. Mein Flieger steht lt P3D an Gate 17, aber auf dem Beton steht auf blauem Grund 05A. D.h. wenn ich nach einer Landung an einem bestimmten Gate andocken möchte muss ich die Gates erst einmal abzählen, damit ich nicht am falschen Gate lande. Das kann doch wohl nicht richtig sein, oder doch?   Mit Grüßen von der Kieler Förde ciao Horst  
    • OK. Thanks for this information. I'll give this a try. To be honest, I wasn't able to reproduce the direct-to issue yet. May be this helps.