Vorschau

Woran Aerosoft gerade arbeitet

54 topics in this forum

  1. Hannover X

    • 4 replies
    • 3128 views
    • 2 replies
    • 746 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1365 views
    • 6 replies
    • 1795 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1386 views
    • 0 replies
    • 1513 views
    • 11 replies
    • 2177 views
  2. Airline Company

    • 30 replies
    • 5974 views
    • 6 replies
    • 2498 views
  3. Malaga X

    • 2 replies
    • 1898 views
    • 1 reply
    • 2526 views
  4. Neues aus Frankfurt?

    • 57 replies
    • 8552 views
  5. Fernbus Simulator

    • 0 replies
    • 2118 views
  6. Bridge 2

    • 0 replies
    • 1626 views
  7. SimObject Display Engine

    • 0 replies
    • 1943 views
    • 5 replies
    • 2857 views
    • 16 replies
    • 3265 views
    • 5 replies
    • 4956 views
    • 23 replies
    • 6158 views
  8. Genua

    • 1 reply
    • 1957 views
    • 1 reply
    • 3558 views
    • 0 replies
    • 5319 views
    • 3 replies
    • 2628 views
    • 0 replies
    • 2459 views
  9. Bergen X: Neues Projekt

    • 2 replies
    • 3246 views
  • Posts

    • I do not subscribe to the hype about the other (Non Airbus) A320. I, like you (J VAN E) have all the options I need and I am not willing to pay a significantly more amount of money for things that I will not use. I do not think either plane competes against each other as they represent two different markets. I am anxiously waiting for the A318/19 as It's my go to plane. I have not even bothered to install my P3Dv4 yet as I cannot bring myself to give up the the A319. The one thing that cements my strong belief in the Aerosoft Airbus is that all the platforms (Except X Plane) are covered for the same price and that Aerosoft only charges for upgraded files. Anyway, back to waiting. I know it will be worth it. 
    • @datguythoSo the BARO is the minimum altitude, I always thought it was a backup altimeter reading, ok I will try that thank you
    • Yes. On the approach page enter the minimum at the BARO (in this case 396 feet) if its an altitude. You can look up the necessary minimums at the approach charts.
    • @Frank Docter Thank you for your reply, your solution sounds good however I do not mess around with the "incorrect minimum" so is this in the approach page with temperature, winds, baro etc?
    • Optimum Stepclimbs still doesn't work. (Optimize Altitude/FL - min.Time, - min.Fuel , -min.Cost also pointless)   again back to 1.28.8. (Opt.Climbs works in 1.28.8 but often with high discrepancy. Aircraft Template Profile is set correct.)